Case Studies
The 1988 Supreme Court case Honig v. DoeLinks to an external site. involved two boys with disabilities, both of whom were harshly disciplined by their respective schools for aggressive behavior displayed at school. Due to the extreme behaviors exhibited, the two boys were recommended for expulsion. They were suspended indefinitely, until which time the school district completed the expulsion proceedings. The parents of both boys disagreed with the unilateral decision of the district regarding their exclusion from school and, as a result, filed suit against the district.
According to the IDEA, children with disabilities are legally required to stay in their current “…educational placements pending the completion of any review proceedings unless parents and state or local educational officials agree otherwise” (Honig v. Doe, 2012, Facts of the Case, para. 2). The Supreme Court determined that each boy’s behavior was directly related to their disabilities; therefore, the school board’s decision violated the intent of the IDEA.
Assignment Instructions
Use the following instructions for the content and written communication expectations. Before submission, review your assignment using the Grading Rubric to ensure it meets the expectations for distinguished performance. If you have questions about the assignment or the rubric, please contact your instructor before the due date.
In your assignment,
- Create a title page or slide with the following information in title case:
- title of assignment
- student’s name
- course name and number
- instructor’s name
- date submitted
- Part One: Analyze in five to seven paragraphs this landmark case, Honig v. Doe.
- Summarize the issue surrounding the court case, the parties involved, and the case outcome.
- Evaluate the impact of the case ruling on compliant implementation of special education programming.
- Explain how the legislation, determined by the final ruling, promotes a collaborative decision-making process regarding special education placement and services.
- Analyze the ethical and legal conflict regarding instruction and student placement that was brought to the forefront as a direct result of this court case.
- Describe how your personal beliefs may have influenced your judgment and the fairness of the final court ruling if you were one of the teachers of John Doe or Jack Smith.
- Analyze the impact of this case in relation to the dispute resolution process and the effects of due process procedures.
- Describe the ethical and legal conflicts regarding instructional and behavioral decisions for students with exceptionalities through the lens of access and inclusion.
- Part Two: Locate two relevant case studies.
- Summarize in one to two paragraphs two case studies, one related to student discipline and one related to another major finding of Honig v. Doe, that occurred after 1994.
- Compare the final ruling of the cases that you have identified to the final rulings of Honig v. Doe in one paragraph.
- Evaluate in one paragraph the experience of finding legal material relating to the principles of IDEA.