Costanza v. Seinfeld, Costanza v. Seinfeld, 181 Misc. 2d 562, 693 N.Y.S.2d 897 (Sup. Ct. N.Y. County

Costanza v. Seinfeld,

Costanza v. Seinfeld, 181 Misc. 2d 562, 693 N.Y.S.2d 897 (Sup. Ct. N.Y. County 1999)

Case Brief should have these elements:

Facts
Procedural History
Issue
Rule
Analysis
Conclusion

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

……………..Answer Preview………………

Costanza v. Seinfeld,

Introduction

            In this case, Michael Costanza filed a case against Jerry Seinfeld and producers for violating his privacy. This is because the comedy character George Costanza was based on his personal life. The case was first heard in 1999, and Costanza lost.  A decade later, the he still lost the case as the Appellate judges of the Supreme Court upheld the 1999 ruling. According to the 1999 ruling, Seinfeld did not use Costanza’s picture, portrait or name. However the final episode was exempted from the ruling. In this episode, Costanza, 43 made a brief, Cameo, hence did not take part any role in the episode. The Appellate judges went on to add that the statute………………

APA

1,186 Words Added to cart