Responses to initial postings should be specific and assess whether posting accurately and sufficiently addresses the questions asked in the discussion topic. Assessments should be explained as to why the information is or is not correct and/or complete, providing correct information to enhance the discussion. Incorporating relevant research from course content or external sources strengthens all postings. in APA format
I need 3 pages paper in nursing field:The topic of the paper is “Way of knowing”
For this assignment, consider Carper’s Ways of Knowing: empirical, personal, ethical, and aesthetic. For each way of knowing, describe a clinical situation including a nursing intervention you implemented while caring for a patient, family, group, or community. In your description, explain how the particular way of knowing informed the decision to implement the intervention.
Use one scholarly reference for each of your four explanations in order to provide support your reasons that a particular intervention is an example of the selected way of knowing. Use a different reference for each of the four descriptions. Use references other than those provided in assigned course readings. APA formatting must be applied and errors in spelling and grammar must be absent; these are standard requirements for presenting scholarly, professional products.
Submission and Point Value:
Please submit paper by the due date and time as indicated in the Course Schedule. This assignment is worth 10 points. See Paper: Ways of Knowing rubric for details.
Criteria
Exemplary
Competent
Not Acceptable
Inclusion of Content
3 Points
Explanation of clinical situation, nursing intervention, and how way of knowing informed intervention choice is entirely clear and thorough for each of the 4 ways of knowing
1.5 Points
Explanation of clinical situation, nursing intervention, and how way of knowing informed intervention choice is moderately clear and thorough for each of the 4 ways of knowing or is provided for 2-3 ways of knowing
0 Points
Explanation of clinical situation, nursing intervention, and how way of knowing informed intervention choice is not clear and thorough for each of the 4 ways of knowing or is provided for 0-1 ways of knowing
Scholarly References
4 Points
Selected a minimum of 4 scholarly references other than course readings and appropriately used to justify each of the 4 intervention-ways of knowing connections
2 Points
Selected 2-3 scholarly references other than course readings and/or appropriately used to justify 2-3 intervention-ways of knowing connections
0 Points
Selected 0-1 scholarly references other than course readings and/or appropriately used to justify 0-1 intervention-ways of knowing connections
Scholarly and Professional Presentation
3 Points
All content is presented in scholarly and professional manner (i.e., no errors in APA formatting, grammar, or spelling)
1.5 Points
Some but not all content is presented in scholarly and professional manner (i.e., no errors in APA formatting, grammar, or spelling)
0 Points
Most content is not presented in scholarly and professional manner (i.e., no errors in APA formatting, grammar, or spelling)
***DUE IN 8-10 HOURS!
Discussion Question:
Research Ebola on the WHO (World Health Organization) and CDC websites. Is the information the same or different? With the Ebola scare in the United States in 2014, how has your perception of world diseases changed? Do you feel nurses should be trained on other global health concerns that are present in other countries? Explain why or why not.
Your initial posting should be 400 words in length and utilize at least one scholarly source other than the textbook
1. Compare and contrast the definitions of health from a public health nursing perspective and list and explain the, three levels of prevention and give an example of each one.
2. Mention and discuss community/public health nursing interventions as explained by the intervention Wheel.
3. Describe and explain the process of conducting a community health assessment and identify and discuss the uses for epidemiological data at each step of the nursing process.
4. Compare the application of the public health principles to the nation’s major health problems at the turn of the twentieth century (i.e. acute disease) with the beginning of the twenty-first century (i.e. chronic disease) and mention and discuss the major contemporary issues facing community/public health nursing, and trace the historical roots to the present.
Re-write fixing the instructor recommendations.
Where it ask about where would you see your self working use(University of Miami Hospital).
Nurses advocate for their patients in many ways and on a daily basis. Many do not realize that by providing care and communicating with patients, they are practicing advocacy. Ways the nurses advocate for patients include; through inter and intrapersonal communication, therapeutic communication, collaboration, socialization, implementation, networking with organizations (specifically those that move to influence legislative change), and identifying health care disparities and health care delivery Grand (Canyon University, 2018).
We are all put in daily situations in which we advocate for our patients. One that jumps out to me, is a patient who came in as an outpatient and was status post op for a laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The patient came over from PACU into second phase recovery after over an hour and a half in the PACU. Bedside report revealed that the patient was thrashing upon arrival to PACU, pain was not manageable, and the patient’s blood pressure decreased while heart rate increased. The patient was still uncomfortable and thrashing around. I immediately contacted the physician who came to assess the patient. He stood there stating he didn’t know what was wrong or could be wrong with the patient. I, alongside my charge nurse, pushed for an order to draw a stat hemoglobin and hematocrit as I felt the patient was bleeding internally. It took convincing, but there were no further interventions we could do at this time to help this patient. When the H&H came back, it had dropped significantly compared to his preoperative levels the day before and below the norms. The patient was rushed back into the operating room where it was discovered he had ripped his internal stitches due to the thrashing around postoperatively. If it wasn’t for us advocating and pushing for the lab draw, the surgeon may have let the patient discharge where he would have bled a significant amount more. He could have potentially died. An Incident Report Form was completed on this situation.
Reference
Grand Canyon University. (2018). Professional Engagement. Retrieved from
https://lc.gcumedia.com/nrs430v/dynamics-in-nursing-art-and-science-of-professional-
practice/v1.1/#/chapter/5
The U.S. Department of Health & Human Services released a comprehensive Clinical Practice Guideline for Treating Tobacco Use and Dependence–2008 Update
https://www.ahrq.gov/professionals/clinicians-providers/guidelines-recommendations/tobacco/clinicians/update/index.html
The goal of these recommendations is that clinicians strongly recommend the use of effective tobacco dependence counseling and medication treatments to their patients who use tobacco, and that health systems, insurers, and purchasers assist clinicians in making such effective treatments available.
After reading these recommendations answer the following questions.
1. what are the clinical interventions for patients unwilling to quit cigarette smoking?
2. According to the best practices what are the best strategies to help your clients quit smoking?
3. are there any specific smoking cessation recommendations for especial populations such as teenagers or the elderly?
Assignments:
Library Assignment
Critique a Research Article
A critique is a method of displaying a logical and organized analysis of a written or oral piece. Critique can provide the readers with both positive and negative outcomes depending on the author. The purpose of this assignment is for the student to perform a critique on a research article that deals with today’s health issues. In this paper the student must be diligent at what the author is claiming, taking into account the research methods being utilized and look for pros and cons of the researcher’s outcomes.
The assignment must be a minimal of five pages, excluding title page and references. The assignment must be strictly following APA guidelines, points will be deducted if otherwise. Do not use first person throughout the paper until the section called evaluate the paper. It will be divided in the following manner:
Title page: Give the name of the article, the authors name(s) and your name. Following APA
Introduction:
· Provide an overview of the author’s research problem, research questions and main point including how the author supports his or her point.
· Explain what the author initial objectives (hypothesis) and results including the process he or she used to arrive at such conclusion.
Evaluate the Research Methods: in paragraph form answer the following:
· Does the author provide a literature review?
· Is the research current and relevant to today existing health issues?
· Describe the research type utilized? – experimental, non-experimental, quasi experimental, etc.
· Evaluate the sample (size, composition, or in the way the sample was selected in relation to the purpose of the study? Was the sample appropriate for the research or was it bias?
· How practical does this work seem to you? How does the author suggest research results could be applied and how do you believe they could be applied?
· Could the study have been improved in your opinion? If so provide how you think it could have improved.
· Is the writing in the article clear straightforward?
· Can further research be conducted on this subject? Explain
Conclusion: In your conclusion, try to synthesize the pieces of your critique to emphasize your own main points about the author’s work, relating the researcher’s work to your own knowledge or to topics being discussed in your course.
Reference Page: APA style, see rubric attached for assignment
see attached
Academicpapers.net is a pioneering academic writing service with a customer base comprising of thousands of students. We have hundreds of expert writers aboard working in collaboration with a diligent quality assurance team.
Phone: +1 (940) 905 5542