Prompt 1

Galen’s Online Library Resources

Galen’s Online Library has a host of peer reviewed sources and other credible sources for academic research. Search the Online library for an article that discusses one of the following:Smartphone use in the healthcare field Electronic Medical Records (anything related to this topic is fine…cost, implementation, system capabilities, etc) Privacy and Security concerns related to electronic records Database use in the healthcare environment Telemedicine The HITECH Act

* Please do not conduct a ‘Basic’ search and automatically choose the first article in the results list! This will become a boring conversation pretty quickly if everyone does that! Skim the results of your search terms, play with different search terms and limiters and skim the results you are getting. Then, choose an article that stands out to you.

In your post you should:

1. Share the article that you found,

2. Share the method you used to conduct your search,

3. Mention the database(s) that you used to conduct your search,

4. Tell us the key word(s) used in your search,

5. And share: What level of difficulty did you encounter in your search process? 

 

150 WORDS, APA FORMAT

ALL ANSWERS TO THESE QUESTIONS HAVE TO BE 200 WORDS IN LENGTH.

1.  Discuss how an automated answering system may be effectively utilized, and discuss the differences between this system and an answering service.  

2.  Outline the major differences between new and established patients and how healthcare professionals should handle each patient type.
3.  Describe the pros and cons of using stream scheduling.
 

 Details:

The practice of health care providers at all levels brings you into contact with people from a variety of faiths. This calls for knowledge and acceptance of a diversity of faith expressions.

The purpose of this paper is to complete a comparative ethical analysis of George’s situation and decision from the perspective of two worldviews or religions: Christianity and a second religion of your choosing. For the second faith, choose a faith that is unfamiliar to you. Examples of faiths to choose from include Sikh, Baha’i, Buddhism, Shintoism, etc.

In your comparative analysis, address all of the worldview questions in detail for Christianity and your selected faith. Refer to Chapter 2 of Called to Care for the list of questions. Once you have outlined the worldview of each religion, begin your ethical analysis from each perspective.

In a minimum of 1,500-2,000 words, provide an ethical analysis based upon the different belief systems, reinforcing major themes with insights gained from your research, and answering the following questions based on the research: How would each religion interpret the nature of George’s malady and suffering? Is there a “why” to his disease and suffering? (i.e., is there a reason for why George is ill, beyond the reality of physical malady?) In George’s analysis of his own life, how would each religion think about the value of his life as a person, and value of his life with ALS? What sorts of values and considerations would each religion focus on in deliberating about whether or not George should opt for euthanasia? Given the above, what options would be morally justified under each religion for George and why? Finally, present and defend your own view.

Support your position by referencing at least three academic resources (preferably from the GCU Library) in addition to the course readings, lectures, the Bible, and the textbooks for each religion. Each religion must have a primary source included. A total of six references are required according to the specifications listed above. Incorporate the research into your writing in an appropriate, scholarly manner.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.

You have been provided with case study in Week 4 that focused on genitourinary .You will analyze and create a comprehensive plan of care for acute/chronic care, disease prevention, and health promotion for that patient and disorder. Your care plan should be based on current best practices and supported with citations from current literature, such as systematic reviews, published practice guidelines, standards of care from specialty organizations, and other research based resources. In addition, you will provide a detailed scientific rationale that justifies the inclusion of this evidence in your plan. Your paper should adhere to APA format for title page, headings, citations, and references. The paper should be no more than 3 pages typed excluding title page and references.

Criteria:SOAP noteEvaluation of priority diagnosisFacilitators and barriers to disorder management

 

Assignment 2 Grading Criteria

Maximum PointsIntroduction

The submission included a general introduction to the priority diagnosis.

10Subjective Data

The submission included the patient’s interpretation of current medical problem. It included chief complaint, history of present illness, current medications and reason prescribed, past medical history, family history, and review of systems.

15Objective Data

The submission included the measurements and observations obtained by the nurse practitioner. It included head to toe physical examination, laboratory and diagnostic testing results.

15Assessment

The submission included at least three priority diagnoses. Each diagnosis was supported by documentation in subjective and objective notes and free of essential omissions. All diagnoses were documented using acceptable terminologies and current ICD-10 codes.

20Plan of Care

Plan included diagnostic and therapeutic (pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic) management as well as education and counseling provided. The plan was supported by evidence/guidelines, and the follow-up plans were noted.

25Evaluation of Priority Diagnosis

The plan chose the priority diagnosis for the pt and differentiated the disorder from normal development. Discussed the physical and psychological demands the disorder places on the patient and family and key concepts to discuss with them. Identified key interdisciplinary team personnel needed and how this team will provide care to achieve optimal disorder management and outcomes.

25Facilitators and Barriers

The submission interpreted facilitators and barriers to optimal disorder management and outcomes and strategies to overcome the identified barriers.

20Conclusion

The submission included what should be taken away from this assignment.

10APA/Style/Format

The submission was free of grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. Citations and references were written in correct APA Style.
Utilized proper format with coversheet, header.

10

Total

150

 

 

 Prepare A Genogram For The Client You Selected. The Genogram Should Extend Back By At Least Three Generations (Great Grandparents, Grandparents, And Parents)

I will provide a client without violating HIPPA these are the areas need to be addressed in the genogram Demographic information Presenting problem History or present illness Past psychiatric history Medical history Substance use history Developmental history Family psychiatric history Psychosocial history History of abuse/trauma Review of systems Physical assessment Mental status exam Differential diagnosis Case formulation Treatment plan

 Pain Today (0-10): Pain is described as 1 out of 10.  Allergies: NKDA  SLEEP ISSUES: Hours of sleep per night: 6-7 Snores: No Sleep latency: 0-15 min Daytime Somnolence: No   Substance History: Caffeine Use: No Cups/Date Equivalent: Tobacco/e-cigs: none Packs/Date Equivalent: Illicit drug use: denied   DEVELOPMENTAL/SOCIAL HISTORY: Patient reports that he grew up in Mississippi. His father died in a motor vehicle accident when he was several months old. Raised by his mother and stepfather. Denies any abuse history. Never married. Has a bachelor’s of arts in communication from Grambling UNIV. reports that he worked at Lowe’s during college and thereafter. Is an AGR Soldier within the United States Army reserves in Mississippi from 2012-2018. States that his religion and spiritual values preference being Christian.  Patient was primarily raised by Biological parents and that childhood was generally Good. Patient denies ever being physically, sexually or emotionally abused. Highest level of education achieved is: 4-year college degree or equivalent. Patient is currently single and currently lives with Other. Housing is currently Off-Post. Patient reports religion, faith or spirituality DO play an important role in life. Social support reported as satisfactory. Patient reports the following history of legal issues: None of the above.  PAST FAMILY/MEDICAL HISTORY: Family Medical Illnesses: None Family Behavioral Health Illnesses: None Family Substance Use History: None  OBJECTIVE MSE Orientation: ☐None ☒Place ☒Object ☒Person ☒Time Attention: ☒Normal ☐Distracted ☒Other: Maintained focus and attention throughout the session. Appearance: ☒Neat ☐Disheveled ☐Inappropriate ☐Bizarre ☒Other: dressed in civilian attire. Behavior: ☒Cooperative ☐Guarded ☐Withdrawn ☐Agitated ☐Stereotyped ☐Aggressive ☒Other: calm Eye Contact: ☒Normal ☐Intense ☐Limited ☒Other: maintained appropriate eye contact during the session. Psychomotor: ☒Normal ☐Restless ☐Tics ☐Slowed ☐Other Speech: ☒Normal rate, volume, and rhythm ☐Tangential ☐Pressured ☐Impoverished ☐Other Mood: “I feel good overall.” Affect: ☒Congruent with mood ☒Euthymic ☐Anxious ☐Angry ☐Depressed ☐Euphoric ☐Irritable ☐Constricted ☐Flat ☐Labile ☐Other Thought Process: ☒WNL ☐Circumstantial ☐Tangential ☐Loose Associations ☐Disorganized ☐Other Thought Content: ☒WNL ☐SI ☐HI ☒ potentially paranoid ☐A/V hallucinations ☐Delusional ☒Other: Denies SI/HI plan or intent Memory Impairment: ☒WNL ☐Short-Term ☐Long-Term ☐Other Insight: ☐Good ☒Fair ☐Poor Comments: Judgment: ☐Good ☒Fair ☐Poor Comments:  BHDP: Behavioral Health Vitals (patient reported): Overall health reported as: Good Pain Level (0-10): 0 Currently treated: N/A Suicidal Ideation Risk – C-SSRS-S score: 0 Past/Prep Behavior last 3 months: N/A # past attempts as of 12/07/2016: 2 Most recent Suicidal Ideation: N/A Suicidal Ideation Duration: N/A Suicidal Ideation Frequency: N/A Protective Elements Stopping Suicidal Actions: Faith/Religion, Family, Hope for future, Friends, Other Harm Others Risk over next week as of 12/18/2018 – None Active Plan: N/A Patient with access to weapons: No  Recent Outcome Measures (last 30 days) BASIS24 – Score: 0.56 – Subclinical to low level of general distress reported (12/18/2018) PHQ9 – Score: 4 – Depressive syndrome unlikely (12/18/2018) GAD7 – Score: 3 – Anxiety syndrome unlikely (12/18/2018) PCL-5 – Score: 3 – None-Low PTSD symptoms reported (12/18/2018) PCL-C: N/A AUDIT: N/A CSI – Score: 8 – Possible relationship distress reported. Evaluation indicated. (11/30/2018) ISI – Score: 9 – Subthreshold insomnia (12/18/2018) BAM: N/A  LABORATORY RESULTS: Reviewed laboratory results  ASSESSMENT Patient Strengths: ☐ None reported ☐ motivated ☐ insightful ☐ committed ☐ Tx compliant ☒ family support ☐ social support ☐desires change ☐ previous positive BH experience ☐ desire to address longstanding issues ☒ good expressive language ☐ good ego strength ☐ Other:  Patient Barriers: ☐ None reported ☐ unmotivated ☐ limited insight ☒ uncommitted ☐ Tx non-compliant ☐ limited family support: ☐resistant ☐co-morbid Dx ☐ previous negative BH experience ☒ limited social support ☐cognitive impairment/TBI ☐low ego strength ☒ Other: Not resistant but questions the validity of his behavioral healthcare  SAFETY RISK ASSESSMENT ☐YES ☒NO History of Suicidal Ideation: ☐YES ☒NO History of Suicidal Planning: ☐YES ☒NO History of Suicidal Gestures: ☐YES ☒NO History of Suicidal Attempts: ☐YES ☒NO Close friends/family who have attempted/completed suicide: ☐YES ☒NO History of intentionally harming others or destroying property: ☐YES ☒NO Current intentions to engage in above behaviors: ☐YES ☒NO History of impulsive-taking:  Risk Factors: ☐None reported ☒Male ☐Impulsive ☒Weapons access ☐Legal Stressors ☐Financial Stressors ☒Occupational conflict ☐Chronic medical problems ☐Substance abuse: ☐Abuse victim: ☐History of suicidal gestures ☐History of family/friend suicide ☐Relationship problems ☐OTHER: insomnia  Protective Factors: ☐None reported ☐Married ☐Children ☒Positive religious coping ☒Future orientation ☒Healthy coping skills ☐Active treatment participation ☒Supportive spouse ☐Supportive family ☐Social support ☒PT wants to continue treatment ☐OTHER:  This provider considered the above risk/protective factors and has determined the following risk level: RISK: Harm to Self – ☒Not Elevated ☐Low ☐Intermediate ☐High Harm to Others – ☒Not Elevated ☐Low ☐Intermediate ☐High SAFETY:☐YES ☒NO Imminent threat to self. ☐YES ☒NO Imminent threat to others. ☐YES ☒NO Imminent threat of harm from other individuals. ☒YES ☐NO Patient is fully able to make informed medical decisions and manage affairs. ☒YES ☐NO Patient is unlikely to withhold information about SI/HI ideation or intent. ☒YES ☐NO Patient is considered to be a reliable source of information.  DIAGNOSTIC FORMULATION: This is a 35-year-old male who was deployed to the Middle East as an individual unit augmentee. He reports that he became an conflict with his leadership over mishandling funds, and other ethical related issues. The unit is making the claim that the patient is misperceiving these incidences, based off of the provider assessment in-theater; paranoia over this situation was identified.  DSM Diagnosis(es) Code: Other occupational structure stressors R/O: Delusional Disorder, psychosis  Estimated Treatment Prognosis: Good .  PLAN Treatment Summary: 1) Patient was provided psychoeducation, assessment of current functioning, risk/safety assessment, development of rapport, development of treatment goals, empathic listening and directed questioning techniques to elicit information and provided supportive environment to facilitate patient insight. Patient was provided active listening, strategic reflection, encouragement and validation. Other therapies discussed include: 1. Diaphragmatic Breathing 2. Progressive Muscle Relaxation 3. Safe Place Imagery 4. Mindful breathing 5. Problem solving techniques 6. Sleep Hygiene 7. Discussed, Virtual Hope box, Tactical Breather, Moving forward and Mindfulness coach apps available on smart phone.  2) Discussed open-access clinic available at BH clinic. Pt agree if symptoms worsen or if new behavioral concerns arise, Pt to call, RTC, or if after duty hours, go to ED and/or call emergency line. Limits to confidentiality were discussed with the patient as appropriate.  3) Attending behavioral health group for deployed service members on Monday, Tuesday, Thursday and/or Friday from 1430-1600.  Medications: None  Risk/Suicide Management Plan: ☒YES ☐N/A The patient will follow-up in therapy to address treatment goals. ☒YES ☐N/A The patient has demonstrated the ability to and has agreed to make use of a crisis response plan. ☐YES ☒N/A The patient was added to the High Interest Program to track continuity of care. ☐YES ☒N/A Persons notified: ☐YES ☒N/A Emergency Contacts: ☒YES ☐N/A Emergency Contacts and Crisis Response Plan: Call friends, family members, or a trusted chaplain. Contact Military One Source at http://www.militaryonesource.mil/ or call 00-800-3429-6477. Call Wounded Soldier and Family Hotline at OCONUS DSN 312-421-3700. Access www.realwarriors.net/livechat for online chat support. After duty hours, call 112, call MPs, First Sergeant or primary supervisor if feeling suicidal. During duty hours, walk in to Behavioral Health Clinic. Go to the Emergency Room at Landstuhl Regional Medical Center. They will call the on-call Behavioral Health Provider. ☐YES ☒N/A Safety plan worksheet uploaded into HAIMS.