https://learn.snhu.edu/content/enforced/296829-PSY-216-X2488-OL-TRAD-UG.19EW2/Course%20Documents/PSY%20216%20Final%20Project%20Guidelines%20and%20Rubric.pdf?_&d2lSessionVal=PQORJzVLvX1Bjux2eDnbvKZlj

This is the link to the final project rubric.

This is due on sunday

Requirements:2-3 Pages, not including title page and referencesAPA formattingOriginal writing, no re-wording, no direct quotes

Topic: Net Neutrality

Briefly (and neutrally) describe the concept of Net Neutrality as defined in the literature. Don’t take a position on it, like whether we need it, just describe the concept in a half page or so.

Describe gaps in current laws or regulations surrounding Net Neutrality as identified in the literature (cite 3-5 researchers). This is where you could bring in both sides of the argument, for and against Net Neutrality regulation.

Propose a policy that would fill the gap. Include 1) your recommendations for measuring compliance, and 2) a future research project that would shed light on the policy’s cost, impact, success or failure

1- Explaining a book called community schools: people and places transforming education and communities by Joanne Ferrera and Reuben Jacobson

2- why public schools have the majority of black and Hispanic students.

3- experiences in community school, (i can provide the experiences)

Assignment Description

Emergency Plan for the Older Adult

Locate the American Red Cross in your area: http://www.redcross.org/ or in person.

• Identify what is necessary for emergency supplies to have on hand for a healthy older adult. Consider visiting with an older family member or friend to identify specific needs for this older adult (reasonable for this person)
• Assist the older adult (OA) in creating their Personal Emergency Plan and contacts
• Describe what the OA was surprised to need or what they seemed to predict on their own
• Why is this important for OA singles or couples who live independently without services?
• Complete at least two slides for each bullet point with a total of 10 slides

Assignment Expectations:

Length: Minimum of 10 content slides

Structure: Include a title slide, objective slide, content slides, and reference slide in APA format. The title/objective/reference slides do not count towards the minimum slide count for this assignment.

References: Use appropriate APA style in-text citations and references for all resources utilized to answer the questions. A minimum of two (2) scholarly sources are required for this assignment.

Rubric: This assignment uses a rubric for scoring. Please review it as part of your assignment preparation and again prior to submission to ensure you have addressed its criteria at the highest level.

Format: Save your assignment as a Microsoft PPT document (.pptx) or a PDF document (.pdf)

In cyber security, incident management is the process of monitoring and detecting events related to security on a computer network and initiating appropriate responses. Essentially, the primary purpose of incident management is to develop clear responses to events that could result in disasters such as remote intrusions. The incident response process detects and evaluates threats and determines their severity, before following the pre- determined incident response plan. In case of incidents that cannot be contained or resolved, other aspects of the contingency plan are implemented, as stipulated the plan. According to Whitman, Mattord, and Green (2013), the incident response process comprises of several stages, which include preparation, detection and analysis, containment, eradication, and recovery, and post- incident activity. This process is crucial in ensuring that the integrity of a network is maintained.

One of the crucial portions of the incident response process is determining the steps that are taken during, after, and prior to the occurrence of an incident. The incident response plan team typically considers every attack scenario and determines the steps. After all feasible attack scenarios are assessed by the incident response team, the team focuses on the steps that should be taken to react to an incident. In all attacks, there is always a trigger, which is caused by a wide range of issues. Some common triggers include loss of connectivity in the network, device malfunctions, complaints from users, notification from an unrecognized device on the network, or unusual traffic in the network (Whitman, Mattord &Green, 2013). Essentially, such triggers let the systems administrator know there is an anomaly in the network that could be an incident.

Notably, upon the occurrence of an incident, it is imperative to react swiftly with a clear plan of action. It is typically up to the incident response duty officer to determine what aspect of the incident response plan to implement. It is also important to note that different attacks require employees with different skills sets. For instance, the skills required to tackle a DDoS attack may not the same, as those need to handle a network virus (Whitman, Mattord & Green, 2013). When an incident occurs, the reaction processes should be preceded by a clear determination of a plan of action. For instance, in the event of a virus on the network, the first step would be to check the logs, virus scanners, as well as other systems designed to monitor unusual activity (Thompson, 2018). The next step would be to ascertain the scope of the infestation by checking all devices on the network and placing the infected ones under quarantine.

Part of planning for incidents involves knowing ones’ enemy by identifying an organizations assets, weaknesses, and vulnerabilities. This means that one must examine and understand the threats that pose a risk to the organization (Thompson, 2018). In doing so, the organization can identify possible controls, safeguards, and most importantly, countermeasures that would reduce the risk posed by various threats. Some of the measures that a company can implement include providing additional security training to employees, awareness programs, and investing in security technologies such as advanced virus scanners and firewalls (Whitman, Mattord &Green, 2013). In some cases, an organization may terminate an asset by removing it from a risky environment. This is often the case if the cost of protecting the asset exceeds the value of the asset.

Question

What are some of the scenarios where the cost of protecting an asset may not be justified by its value to an organization?