Discussion ONE and TWO peer responses

(1) How effective are police officer body camera initiatives impacting on policing leadership and officer accountability? Explain.

Student expectations for Forum questions:

Each student’s answer to the question should be a minimum of 350 words. A minimum of one peer reviewed reference needs to be used in the development of your answer. You also need to provide two (2) feedback posts to your peers. Each feedback post needs to be 150 words or more and should include information that helps to enhance the discussion on the topic. Do not include statements such as great work, or excellent post. Try to include info that is challenging and respectful and that will stimulate debate. Also, be mindful of including references and citations whenever citing facts to support your position. APA 6th edition citations and references must be used always.

…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

Discussion TWO and TWO peer responses

1. Discuss utilitarianism and deontological ethics.

2. Discuss the different categories of unethical police behavior and provide an example of each. How do these unethical actions impact the policing profession?

3. Discuss civil liability under Federal Code 42 U.S.C. Section 1983.

Instructions:

Original responses to the Forum questions each week need to be substantial (350 – 500 words) and significantly supported by two scholarly references. Students must also use proper spelling, grammar, and sentence structure. The in-text citations and references will be in APA Format.

Students will also be required to respond to at least two (2) other students posting with significant comments that have substance (150 words). Comments such as, “Good job!” or “I agree” do not earn you any participation points. Your responses to another’s work should be posted as a sub-thread to the student’s original posting whom you are commenting.

For the peer responses, please just write a

general response that can be posted on any initial post as an extension

of the information. Thank you.

I have attached the initial posts for reference.

I’ve been to the senior center to teach the old people how to use computer and technolegy for the service learning class. Please write A 4-5 page essay, that discusses your service learning experiences, how you believe they contributed (or not) to your growth as a citizen (of the world), and how the lessons you have learned through these experiences could be useful to future students engaged in service learning.

Sexuality is a powerful socio-political tool and weapon. Discuss how sexual norms and sexual identities intersect with politics and the law, economics and the marketplace and social wellness and disease.

Choose one of the following options for your assignment this week:

Option A: Gender Crimes

Criminal acts occur against individuals because of gender – some of these are labeled as hate crimes in the U.S. (consider cases of violence against transgendered and homosexual individuals) and others occur across cultures. Choose two other types of “gender crimes” and discuss what these acts reveal about deep-seated cultural values and beliefs. One possibility is to examine bride burning or dowry death in India.

Submit a paper (750-1250 words) that explores gender crimes. Provide at least three references cited within the text and listed in the references section.

Option B: Gender Interviews

Interview six people of various ages and ask them what various gender terms mean (transsexual, intersex, transgender, etc.). Also ask them what experience they have in this knowledge – do they know someone who uses a non-binary gender designation or are they basing this information on another source? There is a gap between scholarly understandings and pop culture. Summarize your findings into a report.

Submit a copy of the interview questions and your notes of the interviews, along with your written interpretation of the data (750-1250 words).

Option C: Sexual Terminology

Create a survey of sexual identities. Prepare at least ten questions of various types that elicit the understanding that people have of terms such as bisexual, gay, lesbian, homosexual, queer, and LGBT. Then, conduct the survey with at least ten respondents. What patterns can you find? What terms are most and least agreed upon?

Submit a copy of your questionnaire along with the responses from your subjects. Include your written interpretation of the data (750-1250 words).

Discussion—What You Write Counts

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) is the premier public health agency in the United States and is considered an expert on all public health issues. Review the CDC website to learn how the CDC articulates information related to public health and how you can write a similar narrative in your grant or contract application. Visit this website at the following: cdc.gov

Using the Internet, research the importance of writing a grant or contract proposal narrative. Based on your research, respond to the following:

• Knowing that the “devil is in the details,” what specific steps will you take to make sure you have addressed everything required by a Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA)? Explain your answer with the help of examples.
• Which of these steps will be the most difficult to execute and why? Give reasons and examples in support of your responses. Be sure to cite any relevant resources.

Write your initial response in approximately 300 words

By the due date assigned, post your response to the below Discussion Area. Through the end of the week, review and comment on at least two peers’ responses. Consider commenting on their plans to make sure that everything is in order and that they have adequately addressed every component of the FOA. Respond to the assigned question using the lessons and vocabulary found in the reading. Support your answers with examples and research. Your responses should clarify your understanding of the topic. They should be your own, original, and free from plagiarism. Follow the APA format for writing style, spelling and grammar, and citation of sources. Start reviewing and responding to the postings of your peers as early in the week as possible. Respond to at least two of your peers’ posts. Participate in the discussion by analyzing each response for completeness and accuracy and by suggesting specific additions or clarifications for improving the discussion question response.

Evaluation Criteria:

• Explained the steps required to address everything required by an FOA. Provided relevant examples.
• Identified the most difficult steps to execute and explained why they were difficult.
• Responses demonstrated in-depth research and analysis.
• Justified your answers with appropriate research and reasoning.
• Commented on the postings of at least two peers.

Hi, i have a final paper which is 2400 words. this paper is about a research Q i will post it below also, there is data I got it from the student in class you should use it for this paper. I will provide some References because i used these sources for the previous paper: you have to use the same sources (don’t use different References ) please, read all instruction carefully,

Research Hypothesis:

Take part in game to assess that participation is compelling to get benefit maximization. On premise of game we will assess that the prisoner’s dilemma richly shows when every individual seeks after their very own personal circumstance and benefits, the result is more awful than if they had both collaborated.

The research question would be as follows:

• How can we get maximum benefit that will satisfy to both parties?
• Is the Compromising situation is beneficial in all circumstances?

use these References for the final paper :

Capra, C. M., J. K. Goeree, R. Gomez, and C. A. Holt. 1998. Anomalous behavior in a traveler’s

dilemma? forthcoming in the American Economic Review.

Davis, D. D., and C. A. Holt. 1993. Experimental economics. Princeton: Princeton University

Press 1993.

Holt, C. A., and S. K. Laury. 1997. Voluntary provision of a public good. Journal of Economic

Perspectives 11(Fall): 209-15

Aumann, R. 1987. Game theory. In J. Eatwell, M. Milgate, and P. Newman, eds., The New

Palgrave. London: MacMillan Press, 1987.

Sherman, R. 1971. Empirical oligopoly. Kyklos 24(1): 30-49.

Cooper, R., D. V. DeJong, R. Forsythe, and T. W. Ross. 1996. Cooperation without reputation:

Experimental evidence from prisoner’s dilemma games. Games and Economic Behavior

12(February): 187-218.