Workers’ compensation is the only means for workers to be able to support their families monetarily during the time of injury, which sometimes may be for a few months to a few years.
Many workers across America have had a negative, perhaps even slightly hostile, experience with workers’ compensation and have had the need to dispute certain aspects such as compensation, medical bill payment, and level of disability rating among other issues.
For this assignment, write an essay describing the benefit of the dispute process for the state that you live and/or work in. Think about these questions when writing your essay:
Why is the dispute process even needed?
What are common causes of injured workers disputing the level of benefits or compensation?
What are the workers’ rights and responsibilities when dealing with disputes?
What is the root cause of disputes? Is it a basic viewpoint of the accident situation in general, or is it a lack of communication, or inaccurate communication between many different groups?
How does the dispute process fit into the claims management process?
Your essay should be a minimum of four pages. At a minimum, the resources you identified in your Unit IV annotated bibliography should be used in your paper. The annotated bibliography itself will not be included as a part of the assignment, just the resources you identified. All sources used, including your textbook, must be cited and referenced following APA guidelines, and your essay should be formatted in APA style to include a title page and reference page.
NOTE: Much of the dispute process may be reviewed on your state’s web page. Remember, the assignment is to show the perceived benefits of the dispute process, not the actual description or purpose of the process.
You must implement the design as presented. To do so you must create a SCRIPT file that performs the following operations:
Drop the database if already exists. Create a database with a suggestive name. Mark that database as default. (0.05 points)
Create the tables with their relationship (FK constraints must be provided) (0.4 points)
Show the tables in the database and show the structure of the created tables (0.05 points)
In the PDF file, you must include your script and an execution of the script either in command line or in MySQL Workbench (screenshots). The source file/screenshots must be signed with your name during execution (e.g. including comments).
You must attach a runnable SQL SCRIPT (a text file), containing the code for both section 12 and section 13. If not included, or not runnable, no points will be given.
SECTION 12: DATABASE DATA (1 point)
You must show the content and insert rows in the tables which have been created in the database (SECTION 11). To do so you must create a SCRIPT file that performs the following operations:
Insert at least 10 rows in each of the tables, if possible (0.8 points)
Continue the script file from the previous section to perform the following ten types of queries.
For each query, you must include in the PDF file the following aspects:
A description in English of what the query is intended to do (this is what the query will be check against)
The source of the query
The resulted table after the execution of the query
It is very important that the query will make sense in the context of the database, i.e. one can imagine a real life scenario when such a query will be made. A query that makes no sense or does not follow the intended description will receive 0 points.
Construct ten queries, based on a single table and satisfying the following requirements
Query 1: Contains at least a calculated column and selects only some of the rows based on a condition
Query 2: Contains only some of the columns in the table and the condition contains at least one logical operator and a function, the results are ordered based on a simple criteria
Query 3: Contains only some of the columns in the table and the condition contains at least two logical operator and two or more functions, the results are ordered based on a two column criteria
Query 4: Contains all the columns in the table and the condition contains at least one logical operator and a function, the results are ordered in descending order
Query 5: Contains only some of the columns and a calculated column in the table and the condition contains at least one logical operator and a function, the results are ordered based on a complex criteria, with at least 3 columns involved, some columns ascending, some descending.
THIS PROJECT IS BASED ON YOUR PREVIOUS PROJECT (P3 STEP 5: CREATING DATABASE), POST THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION, IN THE RESPECTIVE QUESTIONS.
You must submit a PDF document with all the description of the project as required below
The MySQL script creating a database and making the required queries, that will implement the design completely.
You DO NOT have to generate MySQL script from MySQL Workbench.
File name
Template <ID used in the Google Form> – S6 – <Project Title
>
Before starting SECTION 11, attach the screenshot of your designed detailed ERD from the previous project (P3 STEP 5: CREATING DATABASE), for the reference.
Based on the database created in your previous project (P3 STEP 5: CREATING DATABASE) , perform the following 10 types of complex queries.
For each query, you must include in the PDF file the following aspects:
A description in English of what the query is intended to do (this is what the query will be check against)
The source of the query
The resulted table after the execution of the query
It is very important that the query will make sense in the context of the database, i.e. one can imagine a real life scenario when such a query will be made. A query that makes no sense or does not follow the intended description will receive 0 points.
Construct ten queries, based on single and multiple tables. For queries involving more than one table use JOIN clause. Your queries must satisfy the following requirements:
Query 1: Contains only some of the columns in one table involving count function with distinct clause
Query 2: Contains only some of the columns in two tables with at least one aggregate function
Query 3: Contains only some of the columns in three tables involving a subquery
Query 4: Contains only some of the columns in three tables involving a GROUP BY statement and at least one aggregate function
Query 5: Contains only some of the columns in four tables involving a GROUP BY statement and HAVING clause
Query 6: Contains only some of the columns in three tables involving GROUP BY and a subquery
Query 7: Contains only some of the columns in at least four tables involving a GROUP BY and a subquery
Query 8: Contains only some of the columns in at least three tables involving a GROUP BY statement and HAVING clause and a subquery
Query 9: Contains only some of the columns in at least three tables involving both WHERE and HAVING clause
Query 10: Contains only some of the columns in at least three tables involving both WHERE and HAVING clause and a subquery
exam contains 30 objective questions and two essay questions (the Part 1 exam counts 100 points with the 30 objective questions counting 2 points each and the essay questions counting 20 points each).
https://academicpapers.net/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/LOGO-300x75.png00Lizhttps://academicpapers.net/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/LOGO-300x75.pngLiz2020-12-30 12:58:372020-12-30 12:58:37this is a time limited task 2
I want someone who can discuss the importance of increasing police force in order to improve toirism. Correct format and fluent English is amust . All worda should be in English and pactuation should also be correct
https://academicpapers.net/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/LOGO-300x75.png00Lizhttps://academicpapers.net/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/LOGO-300x75.pngLiz2020-12-30 12:53:062020-12-30 12:53:06increasing police force to improve tourism
Here you will find various ideas on how to use and implement various reward and incentive systems. Find various tips and programs currently being used by organizations. Also, search under “pay for performance†to see other developments of this type of reward system.
1. From information you gained from the Web sites, how do you think these suggestions could influence work behavior? Which ones do you think will work better than others? Why?
2. go to specific companies, what other types of reward systems can you find? Give the specifics and critique their value to improving performance in the workplace.
submission should be 8 pages in length and minimum 8 references
https://academicpapers.net/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/LOGO-300x75.png00Lizhttps://academicpapers.net/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/LOGO-300x75.pngLiz2020-12-30 12:52:262020-12-30 12:52:26pay for performance 4
Review this week’s media presentation, as well as Chapters 6 and 8 of the Tharpe et al. text and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services article in the Learning Resources.
Use guidelines on screening for the following topics and reflect on strengths and limitations of the screening guidelines.
Consider how the guidelines might support your clinical decision making.
Research guidelines on screening procedures for the topic assigned to you by the course Instructor (e.g., guidelines on screening for domestic violence, safety, nutrition, osteoporosis, heart disease, mental health, eating disorders, thyroid disease, pap smear, mammogram, cancer, and sexually transmitted infections). Note: The course Instructor will assign a topic to you by Day 1 of this week.
Reflect on strengths and limitations of the screening guidelines.
Consider how the guidelines might support your clinical decision making.
Post an explanation of the guidelines on screening procedures for the topic assigned to you. Include an explanation of strengths and limitations of the guidelines. Then, explain how the guidelines might support your clinical decision making.
Response to the discussion question is reflective with critical
analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the
course readings for the module and current credible sources.
Points:
Points Range: 44 (44%) – 44 (44%)
Thoroughly responds to the discussion question(s)
is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.
supported by at least 3 current, credible sources
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range: 40 (40%) – 43 (43%)
Responds to the discussion question(s)
is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth
supported by at least 3 credible references
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range: 35 (35%) – 39 (39%)
Responds to most of the discussion question(s)
is somewhat reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
50% of post has exceptional depth and breadth
supported by at least 3 credible references
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range: 31 (31%) – 34 (34%)
Responds to some of the discussion question(s)
one to two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed
is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis
somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
post is cited with fewer than 2 credible references
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 30 (30%)
Does not respond to the discussion question(s)
lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria
lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis
does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
contains only 1 or no credible references
Feedback:
Main Posting: Writing
Points:
Points Range: 6 (6%) – 6 (6%)
Written clearly and concisely
Contains no grammatical or spelling errors
Fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range: 5.5 (5.5%) – 5.5 (5.5%)
Written clearly and concisely
May contain one or no grammatical or spelling error
Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Written concisely
May contain one to two grammatical or spelling error
Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range: 4.5 (4.5%) – 4.5 (4.5%)
Written somewhat concisely
May contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors
Contains some APA formatting errors
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 4 (4%)
Not written clearly or concisely
Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors
Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style
Feedback:
Main Posting: Timely and full participation
Points:
Points Range: 10 (10%) – 10 (10%)
Meets requirements for timely and full participation
posts main discussion by due date
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
NA
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
NA
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
NA
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Does not meet requirement for full participation
Feedback:
First Response:
Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources.
Points:
Points Range: 9 (9%) – 9 (9%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings
responds to questions posed by faculty
the use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range: 8.5 (8.5%) – 8.5 (8.5%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range: 7.5 (7.5%) – 8 (8%)
Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range: 6.5 (6.5%) – 7 (7%)
Response is on topic, may have some depth
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 6 (6%)
Response may not be on topic, lacks depth
Feedback:
First Response: Writing
Points:
Points Range: 6 (6%) – 6 (6%)
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues
Response to faculty questions are fully answered if posed
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources
Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range: 5.5 (5.5%) – 5.5 (5.5%)
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues
Response to faculty questions are answered if posed
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources
Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues
Response to faculty questions are mostly answered if posed
Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources
Response is written in Standard Edited English
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range: 4.5 (4.5%) – 4.5 (4.5%)
Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication
Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered if posed
Few or no credible sources are cited
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 4 (4%)
Responses posted in the discussion lack effective
Response to faculty questions are missing
No credible sources are cited
Feedback:
First Response: Timely and full participation
Points:
Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Meets requirements for timely and full participation
posts by due date
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
NA
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
NA
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
NA
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Does not meet requirement for full participation
Feedback:
Second Response: Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources.
Points:
Points Range: 9 (9%) – 9 (9%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings * responds to questions posed by faculty
the use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range: 8.5 (8.5%) – 8.5 (8.5%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range: 7.5 (7.5%) – 8 (8%)
Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range: 6.5 (6.5%) – 7 (7%)
Response is on topic, may have some depth
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 6 (6%)
Response may not be on topic, lacks depth
Feedback:
Second Response: Writing
Points:
Points Range: 6 (6%) – 6 (6%)
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues
Response to faculty questions are fully answered if posed
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources
Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range: 5.5 (5.5%) – 5.5 (5.5%)
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues
Response to faculty questions are answered if posed
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources
Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues
Response to faculty questions are mostly answered if posed
Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources
Response is written in Standard Edited English
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range: 4.5 (4.5%) – 4.5 (4.5%)
Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication
Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered if posed
Few or no credible sources are cited
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 4 (4%)
Responses posted in the discussion lack effective
Response to faculty questions are missing
No credible sources are cited
Feedback:
Second Response: Timely and full participation
Points:
Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Meets requirements for timely and full participation
Posts by due date
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
NA
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
NA
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
NA
Feedback:
Points:
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Does not meet requirement for full participation
Feedback:
Main Posting: Response to the discussion question is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.—
Feedback:
Main Posting: Writing—
Feedback:
Main Posting: Timely and full participation—
Feedback:
First Response:
Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources.—
Feedback:
First Response: Writing—
Feedback:
First Response: Timely and full participation—
Feedback:
Second Response: Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources.—
Feedback:
Second Response: Writing—
https://academicpapers.net/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/LOGO-300x75.png00Lizhttps://academicpapers.net/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/LOGO-300x75.pngLiz2020-12-30 12:51:472020-12-30 12:51:47mental health screening 3
Using scholarly resources from the CSU Online Library, complete an annotated bibliography for the reference resources you will use for the Unit VII assignment, which involves responding to a hazardous materials incident. Make sure your paper has resources that identify the following areas:
Describe inorganic compounds and the chemical family they belong to as well as the hazards associated with that chemical family.
Describe what the chemical(s) are used for in the industrial setting.
Assess the patterns of reactions within inorganic chemistry nomenclature.
Evaluate the methods that could be used to quantify the hazard at an incident site.
Your annotated bibliography should meet all APA style requirements and should have a robust description of each source that is being used (approximately 150 words describing each reference). You should have a minimum of five external sources, one of which can be your textbook. Each source used should be peer-reviewed or academic in nature.
In the assignment for this unit, you will create an outline in preparation for the report you will write in your assignment for Unit VII. In the scenario for the Unit VII assignment, you are a first responder who is responding to an incident that is a mass casualty event where a school bus carrying middle school children collided with two trucks. One track is carrying benzene, and the other truck is carrying ammonium nitrate. Both trucks have released their cargo via spill, and now the school students are in danger of breathing in the vapors.
Complete an outline of how you will write the paper. In your outline, make sure you have components that meet the following requirements:
Distinguish between organic and inorganic chemicals.
Apply chemical reaction basic precautions at the accident scene.
Describe potential reactions that may be present with the chemicals.
Describe the families of hydrocarbons in terms of hazard.
Explain the chemical characteristics of each chemical family.
Outline the potential chemical reactions of hydrocarbons.
Your outline should have a thesis statement at the beginning and follow a logical progressive format that flows appropriately for the given scenario for the Unit VII assignment. Your outline should contain the following:
Title page
Supporting evidence (You should have a minimum of eight external sources)
Headers and sub-headers (All headers and sub-headers should use the same part of speech.)
Reference page
Outline should follow APA formatting guidelines.
Your outline should be a minimum of two pages in length.
For this assignment, you will write a paper in response to the scenario described below. Be sure to use the sources from the annotated bibliography assignment in Unit V. You may also use additional sources as needed. Also, be sure to use the outline you created in the Unit VI assignment.
Scenario: You are a first responder who is responding to an incident that is a mass casualty event where a school bus carrying middle school children collided with two trucks, one carrying benzene and the other carrying ammonium nitrate. Both trucks have released their cargo via spill, and now the school students are in danger of breathing in the vapors. The incident happened on Highway 182 in Orange Beach, Alabama. It is the middle of July and the temperature is 89oF with sunny skies, and the winds are calm for now. Because it is summer, there are clouds building to the west with thunderstorms predicted in the next 90 minutes.
Compile a minimum of four pages to appropriately answer the following questions:
What form would you expect to find the chemicals (liquid, gas, solid, etc.)? Will this form change based on the weather?
Which Department of Transportation (DOT) placards would be used to identify the different hazardous materials cargo?
How would the children on the school bus be best protected from the chemicals (e.g. evacuated, shelter in the bus, etc.)?
Describe the chemical reactions that may take place.
Recommend the risk-based response steps you would take to control the hazardous materials event.
Determine the impact of the weather conditions on the accident site.
Adhere to APA style when constructing this assignment, including in-text citations and references for all sources used.
https://academicpapers.net/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/LOGO-300x75.png00Lizhttps://academicpapers.net/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/LOGO-300x75.pngLiz2020-12-30 12:50:002020-12-30 12:50:00unit 5 and unit 7
I would like you to research about the growth of electric vehicles in the Boise Idaho/Meridian area or their growth in general. Then write a two pages and please include two sources.
https://academicpapers.net/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/LOGO-300x75.png00Lizhttps://academicpapers.net/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/LOGO-300x75.pngLiz2020-12-30 12:48:052020-12-30 12:48:052 pages research paper 1
should be full 9 pages double spaced (not including title and references pages)
do not plagiarise!
i will attach the required documents after being assigned
i need an update of your progress in 12 hours from being assigned.
Read Chapters 5, 6, and 7 in our textbook. After reviewing this week’s required reading, consider the following scenario. You are the lead of the risk management team that has been assigned to evaluate an incident that has occurred. You will prepare a report for the CEO of the hospital that includes all system failures that contributed to the adverse event as well as create a CQI tool (i.e., Pareto, Fishbone, or Flowchart). You are required to download and use the Adverse Event Template document to complete the assignment. Note: If you have responded substantively to each of the content items within the assignment document and included your graph of the data as well as the CQI tool illustration, the template document should be between eight to 10 pages.
Explain the health care professional’s role in the incident.
Historical Background
Discuss the prevalence of the adverse event including historical information (i.e., how often this type of event occurs and prevention methods used by the industry).
Legal and Accrediting Agency Requirements
Address legal ramifications and accreditation agency requirements regarding the adverse event.
CQI Team and Communication
Identify the CQI team members. Based on the members you chose:
Explain how their role within the hospital would benefit your team in identifying and analyzing the cause of the adverse event.
Discuss issues that could arise between the team members when attempting to develop an improvement plan.
Describe the steps you would take as the CQI team lead to make sure that everyone is able to communicate their opinions and recommendations.
Describe barriers or conflicts that could occur within your team regarding effective communication.
Operational or Safety Processes
Discuss at least two operational and safety processes that you would recommend to the team to avoid future events from occurring.
Explain the rationale for your recommendations.
Impact of Event
Discuss the impact on the hospital if the events continue to occur.
Discuss the impact to the patients if the events continue to occur.
Note: The number of beds and operating rooms increased from 2017 to 2018.
Once you choose your adverse event, graph the data from the chart above. You will graph Column A and B against the chosen event (i.e., number of medication errors, number of patient falls, or number of post-operative hemorrhages). For example, if I were to choose medication errors, I would enter the details from column A, B, and C. Once your graph is complete, copy/paste it in the space indicated within the template.
Include an analysis of the data within the spaces indicated in the template:
Discuss the frequency of the adverse event as compared to the increase or decrease of patient discharges.
Analyze the data (what is the data telling you?).
Identify the possible factors, in your opinion, that could be attributed to the change.
Choose one of the CQI Tools listed below that best aligns with your chosen Adverse Event. Each of the tools listed below are hyperlinked to the Institute for Health Care Improvement website, which discusses and illustrates examples of each type of tool.
Next, you will be responsible for creating the CQI Tool, completing the tool, taking a screenshot, and copying/pasting the screenshot into the space indicated within the Adverse Event Template.
After describing the event in Part 1, using a Graph in Part 2 and CQI tool in Part 3, you will apply the PDSA model in Part 4 to summarize the process and steps that your team would recommend to the CEO to prevent this adverse event from reoccurring.
Respond to the items in Part 4 of the template by including the following:
Plan
Identify the problem that caused the adverse event/
Identify your objective.
Identify the team members that will assist in the development of a plan for improvement.
Describe how you would communicate the plan to the stakeholders.
Discuss the reasons for collecting the data associated with the chosen scenario.
Identify where you will pilot the new plan of action.
Identify who, what, or why for your pilot of the improvement plan. (When you implement any new plan of action in a hospital setting, you will do a pilot of the new plan in a small, targeted area or department. For example, if you chose medication errors, a group of patients will be on the same floor [e.g., medical unit, cardiac unit, etc.]. If you chose patient falls, the patients will have the same diagnosis [e.g., hip replacement, etc.]. If you chose post-operative hemorrhage, the patients will have the same type of surgical procedure [e.g., abdominal surgeries, etc.].)
Do
Develop three possible solutions to the problem.
Select one of the possible solutions to implement in the pilot phase.
Discuss the result of the pilot (create your own scenario).
Explain in detail the methods utilized to communicate the improvement process to the area chosen for the pilot phase.
Study
Summarize the data collected.
Discuss how you would measure whether the pilot solution was effective.
List observations.
Discuss any problems that may have occurred in your scenario.
Discuss any communication issues.
Compare your objective in the Plan phase to that of the actual pilot result.
Discuss what needs to be revised in your improvement plan to meet your objective.
Act
Discuss your revised plan.
Describe how you are going to implement the plan hospital-wide.
Describe how you will continually monitor the improvement plan to ensure sustained success.
Determine if one of the steps you are recommending would require a check and balance step.
Discuss why it is necessary. (It is important to keep in mind that some processes require a system of checks and balances.)
Paper Requirements:
The Adverse Event Template document, once completed,
Should demonstrate an understanding of the reading assignments, class discussions, your own research, and the application of new knowledge.
Must have substantive responses within the template and include complete sentences in paragraph format, including citations for each reference listed. Refer to the Ashford Writing Center (Links to an external site.) for information on APA guidelines.
Must demonstrate understanding of the reading assignments, class discussions, your own research, and the application of new knowledge. Two of your four sources must be from the Ashford University Library and must have been published within the past five years.
The Adverse Event Reporting paper, in the template,
Must include a separate title page with the following:
Title of paper
Student’s name
Course name and number
Instructor’s name
Date submitted
Must use at least four scholarly sources in addition to the course text.
The Scholarly, Peer Reviewed, and Other Credible Sources (Links to an external site.) table offers additional guidance on appropriate source types. If you have questions about whether a specific source is appropriate for this assignment, please contact your instructor. Your instructor has the final say about the appropriateness of a specific source for a particular assignment.
Must document all sources in APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.
Must include a separate references page that is formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.
https://academicpapers.net/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/LOGO-300x75.png00Lizhttps://academicpapers.net/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/LOGO-300x75.pngLiz2020-12-30 12:38:592020-12-30 12:38:59help with assignment hca 375 paper 1
