PHL 458 Week 3     Evaluating Truth and Validity Exercise

/in /by

   Week 3 Evaluating Truth and Validity Exercise

Select ONE of the scenarios in the Applications list 12.2 (a.-y.) at the end of Ch. 12 in The Art of Thinking.

Apply the following in 700 words for the scenario: 

Evaluate the argument, using      the 4-step process described on p. 218, regarding soundness of reasoning      (truth and validity). 

Explain your assessment and add      alternative argumentation where necessary. 

Format your assignment according to appropriate course level APA guidelines.

Polemic Assignment

/in /by

  

I need to do polemic assignment form a newspaper editorial or an excerpt from a longer editorial, approximately 400 – 700 words, and critique its arguments point by point. 

You must disagree with (not personally disagree; that’s your business) with the editorial that you have chosen. It is helpful to pretend that you are writing to someone who disagrees with you and who agrees with the article you have chosen to critique. You are explaining why the article fails to prove its case. Your own experience and opinions only become relevant in refuting one of the article’s points. Thus the assignment is somewhat akin to cross-examination in a debate.

Although I want you to address every part of the editorial, you do not have to disagree with every assertion the author makes. It can be quite helpful to break down paragraphs into standard form arguments, but one of the easiest ways to do poorly on the polemic assignment is to give an almost mathematical analyses of each each premise and  

Adult Dev Reply 4

/in /by

Due 1/27

Ignore, Double post.

/in /by

Ignore this, it is a duplicate post

LANGUAGE pAPER FOR PSY/360

/in /by

 

Write a 1,050- to 1,400-word paper in which you examine language as it relates to cognition. Address the following: Define language and lexicon. Evaluate the key features of language. Describe the four levels of language structure and processing. Analyze the role of language processing in cognitive psychology.

Click the Assignment Files tab to submit your assignment.

Part B- Giants Of The Arts

/in /by

 

Using 100-200 words, of all the sculptures you viewed in this class so far (and don’t forget all of those Venus’s in Module 2), which one is your favorite?Name this sculpture and its author.Why is this your favorite?What qualities does it have that you like?Is it full-round or relief?What kind of mass does it have?How does the form create the line?You should answer these questions in one coherent, cohesive paragraph. The more developed your response, the more work you will have completed for this week’s writing assignment–and the more time and energy you will be able to devote to Part A of this week’s Writing Assignment.

PSY615 Discussion #2 Counseling-Based Personality Assessment Scenario

/in /by

  

Prior to beginning work on this discussion, read the Cohen, et al. (2013) and Wu, et al. (2007) articles and review the Evaluating Mental Health Patients (Links to an external site.) Links to an external site and Human Metrics Jung Typology Test (Links to an external site.) Links to an external site websites

For this discussion, you will be taking on the role of the intake counselor at a mental health facility. In this role, you will facilitate the evaluation of a client based on clinical personality assessments, mental status exam, and observations of the client to make recommendations to the treatment team consisting of the clinical psychologist, counselors, and case manager for the client. Carefully review the PSY615: Week Two Counseling-Based Personality Assessment Scenario (Links to an external site.) Links to an external site

In your initial post, examine the personality assessment instrument used in the scenario and research a peer-reviewed article in the Ashford University Library on this personality assessment. Using the required articles and websites as well as your researched article to support your statements, describe the standard use of this personality assessment. 

Based on the scenario, evaluate the reliability, validity, and cultural considerations inherent to the personality assessment used and comment on the relevance of these elements within the scenario. 

Analyze and describe some of the potential ethical issues which might arise from the use of this personality assessment in the given scenario. 

Provide information from your research regarding the use of the personality measure, and assess the value of other possible instruments that could be added to create a more complete assessment of the client in the scenario.

Dissertation Annotated Bibliography for….. (Due date – Sunday 28th January)

/in /by

Annotated Bibliography

As  part of your Doctoral Seminar for this set of weeks, you are     participating in a seminar-style discussion about the weekly topics. You must address 5  of the attached Dissertations in the prescribed format. As a related exercise, submit an annotated  bibliography of the 5 resources you referred to this week. For each dissertation entry, be sure to include the full APA citation and address the following :

1. Scope

2. Purpose

3. Philosophical Approach

4. Underlying Assumptions

5. Research

6. Limitations

7. Opportunities for further inquiry

8. Validity of use

General Topic: Sustainability and Community participation

Dissertation Resources:

Ananga, E. O. (2015). The role of community participation in water production and management: Lessons from sustainable aid in Africa international sponsored water schemes in Kisumu, Kenya (Order No. 3733847). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (1737850915). Retrieved from http://ezp.waldenulibrary.org/login?url=https://search-proquest-com.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/docview/1737850915?accountid=14872

Arata, H. L. (2016). When public participation isn’t enough: Community resilience and the failure of colorblind environmental justice policies (Order No. 10191291). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (1859517941). Retrieved from http://ezp.waldenulibrary.org/login?url=https://search-proquest-com.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/docview/1859517941?accountid=14872

Mazzurco, A. (2016). Methods to facilitate community participation in humanitarian engineering projects: Laying the foundation for a learning platform (Order No. 10172873). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (1833187345). Retrieved from http://ezp.waldenulibrary.org/login?url=https://search-proquest-com.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/docview/1833187345?accountid=14872

Godana, G. D. (2014). The rhetoric of community participation: NGOs’ discourses and deliberative practices with communities in Ethiopia (Order No. 3666194). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (1640889019). Retrieved from http://ezp.waldenulibrary.org/login?url=https://search-proquest-com.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/docview/1640889019?accountid=14872

Barclay, N. (2016). The role of community participation for green stormwater infrastructure development (Order No. 10152046). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (1835116804). Retrieved from http://ezp.waldenulibrary.org/login?url=https://search-proquest-com.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/docview/1835116804?accountid=14872

clinical psychology

/in /by

 

Select one of the following disorders: Depressive disorder Generalized anxiety disorder Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder Obsessive-compulsive disorder

Create a Microsoft® PowerPoint® presentation in which you compare and contrast the major approaches to clinical psychology—psychodynamic, cognitive-behavioral, humanistic, and family systems—in relation to the selected disorder. Address the following items: Discuss the philosophical origins of each approach. Identify the goals of each approach. Describe the techniques and strategies used by each approach. Explain how each approach affects the treatment strategies for your selected disorder. Evaluate the effectiveness of each approach, in relation to your selected disorder, based on treatment outcome research.

Include speaker notes with your presentation.

Incorporate information from at least five peer-reviewed publications.

Cite each outside source on a slide titled References.