PSYCHOLOGY 101
What are some additional limitations that human memory has on the use of eye-witness testimony in criminal and civil court cases?
What are some additional limitations that human memory has on the use of eye-witness testimony in criminal and civil court cases?
Complete conclusion slide of power point.
For this assignment, reflect on what you consider to be some of the most significant developments covered in this theme (for example, discoveries, changes in thinking, or research advances), and address the following: Identify the developments and how they impact individuals or larger groups/cultures. Describe how the developments changed society’s understanding. How is the development applicable outside of the social sciences?
This assignment can be completed through a “micro-presentation” format (1 to 2 slides) or a short-answer response (1 to 2 paragraphs).
Please note that this assignment is an opportunity for you to practice elements of the last project, due in the next theme. In that last project, you will complete either a presentation or a short paper. When choosing your format for this assignment, consider what you will do for the last project. Then choose one of the two options below: If you are choosing to submit your final reflection as a presentation: Complete the micro-presentation for this assignment (a presentation with 1 to 2 slides and accompanying notes). You may use a presentation platform of your choice (Microsoft PowerPoint, Prezi, etc.) to complete this assignment. To learn more about obtaining Microsoft 365 and creating PowerPoint or Prezi presentations, view the Supporting Resources document. If you are choosing to submit your final reflection as a short paper: Complete the short answer response for this assignment (a written response of 1 to 2 paragraphs). Both assignments will be graded using the same criteria.
To complete this assignment, review the Learning Block 6-3 Reflection Rubric document.
Hare-Mustin & Marecek (1987, August) specified that when differences between males and females are exaggerated, it is considered alpha bias. When the differences are minimized, it is known as beta bias. They went on to state that alpha bias stemmed from western culture indicating that sexes are fixed and separate, masculinity is the norm, and that females contradict. Beta bias is based on human research up until the last decade being conducted mostly on men and that these results were incorrectly generalized to women. This bias posits that women’s interests are the same as men’s’ and that the role traits of males and females are equal and harmonizing.
While Hyde (2005) emphasized the gender similarities hypothesis which stressed that males and females are similar in most psychological variables, scales like the Gender Traits Test, created by Bem in 1974 to measure one’s level of masculinity and femininity (Helgeson, 2017), demonstrate alpha bias. Society has decided that certain characteristics are considered feminine and others are considered masculine, which divides individuals into separate groups. Yet, there are more similarities than differences and society exaggerate and over interprets those differences (Helgeson, 2017).
This type of assessment hinders research on gender because although there are minimal sex differences, they are not emphasized. Even those few differences, one being visual spatial skills, identified as being stronger in men by Maccoby & Jacklin (1974), are overly simplistic. Visual spatial skills identified as involving three areas of spatial ability: mental rotation, spatial perception, and spatial visualization until Voyer, Voyer, & Bryden (1995). Additionally, of these three areas, only mental rotation has a moderate effect size, which means that there is a significant size difference among scores of men and women (Helgeson, 2017). Also, general society has not been explained this concept. Thus, they tend to remember information that confirms their stereotype and disregard the information that is different than their belief (Helgeson, 2017). They do not realize that even when there are sex differences, this does not imply that all men and women are different in a skill. Instead considering each population (male and female) is under a bell curve, the majority of males and females overlap (Helgeson, 2017).
References
Hare-Mustin, R.T., & Marecek, J. (1987, August). Gender and the meaning of difference: Alpha and beta bias. In R.T. Hare-Mustin & J. Marecek (Chairs),The future of difference: Representations of gender psychology. Symposium conducted at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, New York, NY: Symposium contribution retrieved from the ERIC database (Association No. ED292002).
Helgeson, V.C. (2017). Psychology of gender (5th Ed.). New York, NY: Taylor and Francis.
Hyde, J.S.(2005). The gender similarities hypothesis. American Psychologist, 60(6), 581-592.
Answer the following questions using the text, the University Library, the Internet, and other appropriate resources. Your responses should be 175 to 260 words each.
1. How would you describe personality to a person who has no knowledge of the field of personality psychology?
2. What are some key personality features that define you?
3. Are your personality features consistent, or do they change according to the situation?
4. What are the main tenets of the psychoanalytic perspective of personality? What do all psychoanalytic theories have in common?
Complete the following table:
Theorist
Freud
Main components of his theory (90 words minimum)
Jung
Main components of his theory (90 words minimum)
Significant differences between the two (90 words minimum)
Hello , The submission is expected to be summarized, not just questions and answers. Please resubmit. From the syllabus: The expectation is that the interview will be summarized and there will be information in the summary related to information presented in the textbook, e.g., Sarah plans to breastfeed. Broderick & Blewitt (2014) state that breast feeding is important for…. Length of interview summaries should be 5 pages long.
400 words DUE THE NEXT 8 HOURS PROFESSION- TEACHER
Prior to beginning work on this discussion, read the APA’s Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. in its entirety, paying special attention to standards 8 and 10 that cover ethics in research and therapeutic practice. Oftentimes research methods courses discuss the ethics of research and focus on historic examples of unethical research studies. This discussion of ethics will involve a different focus. The Ethical Principles and Code of Conduct (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. presents information on ethical standards and expectations that apply to specific situations, including therapy and research. Explain the differences between the ethical standards for clients being treated by psychologists in counseling sessions and the standards for conducting psychological research with human participants. Consider your future career, (CAREER– PSYCHOLOGY TEACHER), in the field of psychology and describe the parts of the Ethical Principles and Code of Conduct (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. you expect to relate directly to your future career. Select and provide the number for one ethical requirement that applies specifically to psychological research and briefly summarize the standard. Explain why this requirement may not apply to a therapy situation.
Guided Response: Review several of your colleagues’ posts and respond to at least two of your peers who selected a different ethical requirement than you by 11:59 p.m. on Day 7 of the week. You are encouraged to post your required replies earlier in the week to promote more meaningful interactive discourse in this discussion.
As you formulate your responses, answer the following questions: Did your colleague provide a thorough explanation of the differences between the ethical requirements for research versus those for therapeutic practice? What differences did your colleague note which you did not list in your initial post? Considering the future career your colleague mentioned, did he or she correctly describe the parts of the APA code which would directly relate to that career path? What suggestions might you make to your colleague in terms of ethical standards which would apply to this career path? Do you concur with your colleague’s choice of ethical standard that applies specifically to psychological research? If so, why? If not, what standards might you suggest your colleague consider that apply specifically to research? Did your colleague provide a convincing explanation as to why this standard would not apply to therapeutic practice? Can you think of additional explanations for why this requirement may not apply to a therapy situation?
A random selection of files from a student counseling center revealed the following reasons why college students seek services:
Mental health issues
25
Learning/school issues
15
Relationship issues
5
Other
5 What does it mean to say the files were randomly selected? How would the researcher randomly select files? In other words, what does the process look like? What is the probability that if we pulled another student file from the counseling center the student would fall in each of the following categories a) mental health issues, b) learning/school issues OR relationship issues, c) any category except other? Would our probabilities and results be different if we used convenience sampling? Why or why not?
Write your response in 4-5 paragraphs.
Final Project Milestone Three: Draft of Sociocultural Evaluation and Draft of Program Evaluation
For Milestone Three, you will submit a draft of your sociocultural evaluation and a draft of your program evaluation. The Sociocultural Evaluation requires you to examine the selected program’s ability to be utilized across a diverse population. The goal is to collect information, present your findings, and receive feedback on how to improve each section for your final submission.
see attach
Academicpapers.net is a pioneering academic writing service with a customer base comprising of thousands of students. We have hundreds of expert writers aboard working in collaboration with a diligent quality assurance team.

Phone: +1 (940) 905 5542
