Ashford 4: – Week 3 – Discussion

 

Your initial discussion thread is due on Day 3 (Thursday) and you have until Day 7 (Monday) to respond to your classmates. Your grade will reflect both the quality of your initial post and the depth of your responses. Reference the Discussion Forum Grading Rubric for guidance on how your discussion will be evaluated.
 

     

The   Impact of Cinematography and Editing Options

 Explore movie clips from the Movieclips website or the Internet Movie Database –IMDB. Choose a clip that you wish to analyze. The clip you choose must be from a film (preferably from a film with which you are familiar) – not a film trailer or a mash-up. Re-watch your chosen movie clip while closely observing the mise en scène, making sure to analyze the placement and movement of characters and props in the scene as they relate to camera shots, color, lighting, and other elements of cinematography.
 

In your discussion, analyze at least three elements of cinematography and editing (e.g., lighting, color, shots, focus, transitions, and types of cuts) by evaluating the dramatic impact of the scene. Interpret the scene based on your analysis. In your view, what mood, symbolism, or meaning results from the scene’s creative editing and cinematography?
 

Include the name or partial name of the film clip you analyzed in the “Subject” line of your discussion. Include the link to your film clip in the body of your post. Your initial post should be at least 200 words in length. Support your claims with examples from the required material(s) and/or other scholarly resources, and properly cite any references. By Day 7, respond to at least two classmates who reviewed a different clip than your own. After watching the movie clips reviewed by your classmates, compare how the scenes would be different had the editors or cinematographers chosen other options. Each response should be a minimum of 125 words. 

  

Respond 

 

I need annotative biographies on 5 peer-reviewed articles on the topic of the History of Group Therapy. The following questions must be answered.

 

1.       APA Citation (this will save you lots of time when you are completing your final literature review)

 

2.       What is the article about?

 

3.       Summary of the article.

 

4.       Why was this research performed?

 

5.       What were the findings?

 

6.       What are the strengths of the article?

 

7.       What are the weaknesses?

 

8.       What are the implications for practice within your respective field or area of interest?

 

  

Ashford 6: – Week 5 – Discussion 1

 

Your initial discussion thread is due on Day 3 (Thursday) and you have until Day 7 (Monday) to respond to your classmates. Your grade will reflect both the quality of your initial post and the depth of your responses. Reference the Discussion Forum Grading Rubric for guidance on how your discussion will be evaluated.

 

     

Assessing   Your Program of Study

 Provide a detailed assessment of your program of study, correlated to the six learning outcomes in the Social and Criminal Justice program. Explain, in two to three sentences (at minimum) for each outcome, how your course of study developed your skills in accomplishing each of these program learning outcomes: Analyze criminal justice issues within the systems of      law enforcement, the judiciary, and corrections. Evaluate the application of the social justice      principles of equality, solidarity, and human rights toward building a      just society. Apply knowledge of cultural sensitivity and diversity      awareness to social and criminal justice. Deconstruct the relationship between law enforcement,      the judiciary, and corrections. Interpret the relationship between social justice and      criminal justice. Develop critical perspectives in the study of social      and criminal justice by drawing on the fields of criminology, law,      philosophy, psychology, science, and sociology.

 Your initial post should be 150-200 words in length. Support your claims with examples from the required material(s) and/or other scholarly resources, and properly cite any references. Respond to at least two of your classmates’ posts, by Day 7, by critically comparing the similarities and differences between how your skills and your classmates’ skills have developed over the course of the program. Add any additional points that may encourage further consideration. 

  

Respond 

  

Ashford 3: – Week 2 – Discussion 2

 

Your initial discussion thread is due on Day 3 (Thursday) and you have until Day 7 (Monday) to respond to your classmates. Your grade will reflect both the quality of your initial post and the depth of your responses. Reference the Discussion Forum Grading Rubric for guidance on how your discussion will be evaluated.

 
 

     

Deductive   Logic

Your instructor will choose the discussion question and post it as the first response in the discussion forum. The requirements for this discussion are a minimum of four posts on four separate days. The total combined word count for all of your posts for this discussion, counted together, should be at least 400 words. Answer all the questions in the prompt, and read any resources that are required to complete the discussion properly. In order to satisfy the posting requirements for the week, complete your initial post by Day 3 (Thursday) and your other posts by Day 7 (Monday). We recommend that you get into the discussion early and spread out your posts over the course of the week. Reply to your classmates and instructor. Attempt to take the conversation further by examining their claims or arguments in more depth or responding to the posts that they make to you. Keep the discussion on target, and analyze things in as much detail as you can.

  

Respond