In this assessment task, you will be required to investigate pedagogical practices used to effectively teach students within a Victorian 7-10 classroom (NOTE: not in overall Australia, but particularly in VICTORIA) and examine the value and potential of various instructional strategies available to teach your specialisations (NOTE: your major specialization is ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS and minor specialization is the HUMANITIES); while reflecting on your own teaching practice as you lead into Junior Secondary.
(NOTE: to understand Victorian Curriculum, refer to http://victoriancurriculum.vcaa.vic.edu.au
to understand Victorian Currculum particularly for Economics and Business, go to CURRICULUM, and under the HUMANITIES, click ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS, and then check Curriculum tab.
to understand Victorian Currculum for the Humanities, go to CURRICULUM, and click the HUMANITIES, and then check Curriculum tab.
P.S. In Victorian schools, ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS come under the category of the HUMANITIES. Having said that, these are different subjects. So, this assessment should focus on specialisation 1: ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS
specialization 2: the HUMANITIES (as in overall- includes CIVICS AND CITIZENSHIP, GEOGRAPHY, HISTORY and ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS)
You must include these important features in your report:
1) A short introduction which clearly sets out the context and rationale of your investigation (approx. 150 words)
This includes a brief summary regarding your understandings of adolescent learners and how those ideas connect to your area of specialisations (NOTE: your major specialization is ECONIMICS AND BUSINESS and minor specialization is the HUMANITIES).
2) A review of pedagogy and curriculum literature regarding your specialisation (approx. 400 words)
Read about pedagogy and curriculum and other research resources (NOTE: you can refer to https://www.acer.org/au/publications-and-resources to find research resources); discuss the ways pedagogy and curriculum are planned for and experienced in your Specialisations (NOTE: your major specialization is BUSINESS MANAGEMENT and minor specialization is the HUMANITIES) in a Victorian 7-10 classroom.
Explain what the challenges and the ways of engaging students through a variety of pedagogies are, which cater to your Specialisations (NOTE: your major specialization is BUSINESS MANAGEMENT and minor specialization is the HUMANITIES), considering AITSL standards 1.5, 2.1, 4.1. (NOTE: refer to https://www.aitsl.edu.au/teach/standards#! )
3) Conclusion (approx. 200 words)
Summarise your understandings of how you will cater for engagement, inclusion and differentiation in your 7-10 classroom, by reflecting on your weaknesses and strengths in the areas you have discussed in your report.
You will need to connect your synthesis and application of pedagogy and curriculum in your specialisation to the key approaches and strategies that you believe to best cater for this to occur and where you need to work on during your teaching practice this year to work towards achieving those outcomes (NOTE: refer to AITSL standards where possible).
4) References
Include a minimum of 5 academic references (NOTE: AITSL standards and other government documents, text books are not counted as reference)
Insert in-text citation as well as end reference
Harvard reference required
Include Appendix

My son goes to high school in Pike County, Alabama. I have been out of school for quite some times and I have not clue exactly what I am doing . I was referred by someone to go to this site. I was told it was very helpful. So is it possible to get some assistant in theses Geometry Math problems for my son he’s in the 9th grade.

BUSS5020 – Essay Rubric 2019 Semester 1

HD 100%

HD 90%

D 80%

CR 70%

PASS 60%

PASS 50%

FAIL 40%

FAIL 30%

FAIL 0%

Research
Depth, synthesis
and application of
relevant and
quality research.
20%

Extensive use and
synthesis of
relevant, quality
peer-reviewed
journal articles.
Additional high
quality and
relevant research
is evident. Source
quality and
credibility has
been critically
considered.

Good use and
synthesis of
relevant, quality
peer-reviewed
journal articles.
Additional
research is
generally of a
high quality and
relevance.

Generally,
demonstrates
use and
synthesis of
quality peer
reviewed
articles.

Shows a good
understanding
of the role of
research and
uses some
quality peer
reviewed
articles.

Demonstrates
some depth and
application of
relevant, quality
research. Some
use of quality
peer-reviewed
articles. There is
some room for
more relevant
selection and
application of
research.

Demonstrates
some depth and
application of
relevant, quality
research.
However, in
depth use of
peer-reviewed
journal articles
is lacking.

Over reliant in
places on the
topic article
and/or the
research material.
Additional
supporting
evidence missed
where needed.

Relies mostly on
the
topic/research
material, with
minimal
additional
research. When
used, any
additional
research is of
limited relevance.

Relies almost
entirely on the
topic/research
material, with
minimal
additional
research. When
used, additional
research is
consistently of
very limited
relevance and
quality.

Summary
Quality, depth
and accuracy of
the summary of
the article’s
argument(s).
25%

Excellent, highly
detailed, accurate
and succinct
summary of the
topic.

Very good
summary, with
only minor
areas lacking in
detail.

Good summary,
with some areas
that could do
with more
detail.

Reasonable
level of detail in
the summary,
but some
significant areas
for
improvement.

Reasonable
level of detail in
the summary,
but there were
too many areas
where detail
was consistently
lacking.

Reasonable
quality
summary, but
lacking specific
details and
depth in
multiple places.
This could be
improved
significantly.

Summary
inaccurate or
inadequate in
places relating to
at least one major
element of the
article.

The summary was
lacking depth and
accuracy in
multiple places
for the major
element(s) of the
article.

The summary
was lacking in
depth and/or
accuracy
throughout the
paper.

Evaluation
Quality and depth
of critical
evaluation of the
article’s
argument(s).
30%

High quality, in
depth critical
evaluation
showing
outstanding
depth of insight
into multiple
perspectives on
the debate, and
arrives at a
thoroughly
reasoned overall
judgement.

Good quality,
in-depth critical
evaluation
showing
considerable
depth of insight
into multiple
perspectives on
the debate, and
arrives at a
thoroughly
reasoned
overall
judgement.

Good quality
evaluation,
showed good
insights into
different
perspectives
and shows a
reasoned
overall
judgement.

The response
demonstrates a
good ability to
correctly
identify the
issue(s) and
shows insights
into different
perspectives
and arrives at a
reasoned
judgement.

Generally
quality, in
depth critical
evaluation,
showing some
considerable
insights into
different
perspectives,
and arrives at a
judgement.
Some areas for
improvement.

Reasonable
quality and
depth of critical
analysis.
Considers
different views
and makes a
reasoned
overall
judgement. May
have flawed
reasoning in
places.

Critical analysis
often
demonstrates
limited quality of
evaluation,
demonstrating
limited critical
analysis and
reasoning.

Generally, limited
critical analysis.
Generally, one
sided or fails to
arrive at a
synthesis and
advance an
overall argument
or judgement.

Very limited in
critical analysis,
showing little
evidence of
understanding
or engagement
with the
argument(s).

Communication
Quality and
clarity of business
or academic
writing,
presentation and
structure
20%

The work showed
a near
publishable use of
business or
academic writing
style. Information
was presented in
flawlessly clear
and organised
manner.

Very good
presentation.
Information was
presented in a
clear and
organised and
structured
manner.

Good
presentation.
Information was
generally
presented in an
organised and
structured
manner.

The level of
communication
showed a fairly
good
understanding
of business or
academic
writing style.
Information was
appropriately
categorised.

The level of
communication
showed a
reasonable
understanding
of business or
academic
writing style.

Although the
meaning was
generally
apparent, but
with regular
errors in
spelling,
sentence or
word choice.

The level of
communication
was sometimes
appropriate for
an academic or
business context.
However, there
were sometimes
problems with
spelling, syntax
and/or grammar.

The level of
communication
was not
appropriate for
an academic or
business writing.
There were
frequent errors in
spelling, syntax
and/or grammar.

The level of
communication
did not display
appropriate
business or
academic
writing skills.
The work
caused
significant strain
on the reader.

Referencing
Adherence to APA
6th edition
referencing
standard.
5%

Referencing was
consistently
accurate in
content and style,
adhering to the
APA 6th edition.

Referencing was
very good, but
some minor
issues in
adhering to APA
6th edition.

Good
referencing, in
adhering to APA
6th edition, but
there was one
mistake which
appeared
consistently
throughout the
text.

Reasonable
referencing, it
adhered to APA
6th edition, but
some minor
issues.

In-text and end
of text
referencing was
present where
required, but
with minor
errors.

In-text or end of
text where
required and
stylistically
consistent, but
did not adhere
to APA 6th
edition

In-text
referencing or
quotation marks
missing for at
least one source;
or inaccurate/
missing content
for at least one
reference.

Some in-text
references
missing, or some
quotation marks
missing. Some
references that
are occasionally
inaccurate in
content or some
items missing
from reference
list.

Many in-text or
end of text
references were
missing; or
frequently in
accurate in
content; or no
reference list or
use of non-APA
6th edition style.

Word Count Penalty
Where a student exceeds the word limit length, the student will lose 10% of the total marks. However, when the submission is 10% above the word length
they will lose 10% of the total mark, but for each 10% over, they will lose a further 10% of the total marks.
Late Penalty
Late submission penalty will be 5% per day after the due date for up to 10 calendar days, after which a mark of zero is applied. The closing date is 10
calendar days after the due date.
Appendix/Appendices
The word limit for the assessment is 1100 words. Any appendices are included in the word count and will not be considered where these exceed the word
limit.

Write a paper based on this table of contents.I. Executive SummaryII. IntroductionIII. What is Entrepreneurship?IV. What is Sustainability?V. Why Sustainability is important to society?VI. How do we implement sustainability in entrepreneurship?VII. Why have sustainable business practices become important?VIII. How have schools and organizations embraced the field of Sustainable Entrepreneurship?IX. ConclusionX. References

You are asked to find a current event (defined as an article from 2017-2020) that deals with an issue related to the class. This could be something having to do with an artist, a work of art, the history of art, the process of making art, etc. This should NOT be an exhibition review or a biographical article about a specific artist.

*In this paper, please take time in the first paragraph to concisely summarize the article (Who, what, where, when, why) and its main points.

*Spend another paragraph talking about what this might mean to art in general, how it relates to our class, and how this might make people re-evaluate issues related to this subject in the future.

*The rest of your paper should be about what this might mean to you personally. Does this change the way you view the subject matter? What is something that really stood out to you about the article or the issues outlined within?

*You may also want to talk about the source of this information. Does it come from a museum? An international paper? A national paper? Do you think there might be any bias with the source or the way the article is written?

*Please choose an article that is an appropriate length and not too short. The article you choose should be longer than a blurb or a few sentences. Otherwise, you will not get enough information to write this paper.

*The paper you write should be 1.5-2 typed pages in length, double-spaced, 12-point font.

*Make sure to cite your source at the top of your paper, giving all correct information like source name, title of article, author of article, page numbers (if applicable) and date of article. You can also include a hyperlink if you would like. I do not need a specific format, but I do want enough information so that I can find the article).

Some potential sources:

New York Times Art section: https://www.nytimes.com/topic/subject/art (Links to an external site.)

LA Times Art and Culture: http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/arts/ (Links to an external site.)

Smithsonian Magazine: https://www.smithsonianmag.com/ (Links to an external site.)

Artnet: https://news.artnet.com/art-world (Links to an external site.)

Art in America: https://www.artinamericamagazine.com/ (Links to an external site.)

Art News: http://www.artnews.com/ (Links to an external site.)

Art Forum: https://www.artforum.com/ (Links to an external site.)

Art Newspaper: https://www.theartnewspaper.com/