Submit a fully-developed essay in response to the following question. Your essay should be approximately 800 words (the equivalent of 2 to 3 typed, double-spaced pages) in length. Talcott Parsons sought to explain how social order is possible when human beings are naturally inclined toward "optimization of gratification" (acting selfishly). How well does Parsons' theory of structural functionalism solve the problem of social order
The organization's strategic plan you wrote about in Week 2 calls for an aggressive growth plan, requiring investment in facilities and equipment, growth in productivity, and labor over the next five years. It is your responsibility to determine how the U.S economy during this five year period will impact such an aggressive growth plan. To do so, you should: Develop a 2,100-word economic outlook forecast that includes the following: Analyze the history of changes in GDP, savings, investment, real interest rates, and unemployment and compare to forecast for the next five years. Discuss how government policies can influence economic growth. Analyze how monetary policy could influence the long-run behavior of price levels, inflation rates, costs, and other real or nominal variables. Describe how trade deficits or surpluses can influence the growth of productivity and GDP. Discuss the importance of the market for loanable funds and the market for foreign-currency exchange to the achievement of the strategic plan. Recommend, based on your above findings, whether the strategic plan can be achieved and provide support. Use a minimum of 3 peer-reviewed sources from the University Library. Format your paper consistent with APA guidelines.
The role of schemas differs in automatic vs. controlled thinking processes. How do social roles and schemas affect the formation of biases? Are the effects of biases greater in automatic or controlled thinking processes? Why? Click here for more on this paper……. Click here to have a similar A+ quality paper done for you by one of our writers within the set deadline at a discounted
Compare Reagan’s Berlin Wall speech with Kennedy’s earlier speech in Berlin. Which do you think does a better job of aligning with America’s foreign policy aims? Do you think Reagan’s speech was politically effective? Why, or why not.
Answer only needs to be 2-250 words in length
In Genesis 1-2, The Hebrew Scriptures describe in successive ways the creation of the world and the Divine purpose of mankind. Utilizing the exegetical skills of narrative analysis, first, identify the main tenets of the Creation mandate given by God to mankind as they might relate to business. Second, as the Creation mandate anticipates mankind’s development and adoption of technology, identify the role of innovation and creativity vis-á-vis technology in the Creation mandate. Finally, using what you have identified above, write an essay in which you describe the purpose and call to business as seen in the Creation mandate of Genesis 1-2. In this essay, also explore how an understanding of innovation and creativity as implied in the Creation mandate could play a role in the construction, adaptation, and use of technology in business for the 21st Century.
Coursework Week 8
Documentary Film – Enron: The Smartest Guys in the Room (2005)
Film Summary
‘Enron: The Smartest Guys in the Room’ is a 2005 documentary film detailing the biggest corporate scandal and collapse in American history. Enron is the story of insatiable greed made possible by the perpetrators’ ingenious ability to invent highly questionable methods to portray the company as a successful company and win the trust and admiration of a gullible public with devastating outcomes. The outcomes include: suicides by corporate executives, jail sentences, the dismissal of more than 20,000 employees and the loss of life savings by thousands more while the company’s top executive walk away with more than $1 billion. The company gave itself an appearance of profitability by inflating its profits and concealing its losses through corrupt bookkeeping practices, with the acquiescence of its highly paid firm of accountants, Arthur Anderson.
Within two years of its founding in 1985 by Kenneth Lay, the company becomes embroiled in a scandal after two of its traders begin betting on the oil market resulting in consistent profits. But betting and the publication of consistent profits, which very few questioned, would be the hallmark of the company right up to its collapse.
Enron’s ambition was to reinvent the energy industry as a market place where gas and electricity could be traded like shares and bonds. Put simply, Enron gambled in the energy market and manipulated it and other commodities and even considered ‘trading weather’ at some point.
Its executive officers were involved in the company’s unethical and often criminal activities. These include:
· its founder Kenneth Lay who gambled away all of the company’s assets and reserves and encouraged the company’s president to gambled more in trading and also claimed that the company was the ‘best energy company in the world’ when he should have known that the company was bankrupt and had been worthless for years;
· its president Louise Bourget who diverted the company’s profits into his personal bank account, destroyed the company’s record and gambled the company’s money;
· its new CEO, Jeffrey Skilling who used an accounting tactic, mark-to-market, to record the company’s projected future profits as its current income as soon as a contract was signed regardless of the actual profit that the contract would generate;
· Lou Pai, the elusive CEO of Enron Energy Services who had an obsession of gambling and visiting strip clubs using shareholder money and who left suddenly with a $250 million pay-out when his department was $1 billion in debt.
· Andrew Fastow the Chief Financial Officer who breached his duty to Enron and its shareholders and made more than $45 million through the creation of a number of front companies designed to hide Enron’s losses.
By maintaining an appearance of profitability, the company’s executives were able to consistently reward themselves with huge bonuses.
Question
Assume that Mr Kenneth Lay, the founder of Enron had provided a loan of £1 million to the company and that following the collapse of the company Mr Lay attempted to recover his money from the company but the liquidator resisted his claim on the ground that there was no difference between Mr Lay and the company since he had overall control over the company and that instead of trying to claim money from the company he should be made liable for its debts.
In the film, Mr Louis Bourget the president of Enron diverted the company’s profit into his personal account, destroyed the company’s records, and gambled the company’s money. Mr Andrew Fastow, the company’s Chief Financial Officer created a number of front companies which he uses to defraud Enron of tens of millions of dollars.
You are a legal team summoned to attend a case conference. The liquidator of the company has asked your team to prepare a legal analyses of the company law issues raised in the film and advise on:
a) The merits of the liquidator’s arguments, in British company law, that Mr Lay cannot recover his loan from the company and that he should instead be made to contribute to the company’s debt on the ground that there is no difference between him and the company. Do not deal with any criminal element involved, (40 marks).
b) Mr Louis Bourget’s and Mr Andrew Fastow’s duties as directors of Enron, explaining which duty, if any, they breached under the Companies Act 2006, (60 marks).
You are required to individually prepare a written answer to the question and hand it in to your seminar tutor at the start of your case-conference in week 8. The answer should be between 750 – 1000 words long and should address all the issues raised in the question. The written answer carries 50% of the marks available for this case conference. The group presentation carries the remaining 50%. Marks may be deducted if you do not keep within the word margin. You are expected to word count your work and make a note of this at the end. You are expected to work in your groups for the purposes of the presentation, but the written answer must be prepared INDIVIDUALLY. Collaborative work is an assessment offence. You are reminded that you must support your answer with relevant company law cases and statutory provisions.
Assessment Rationale and Criteria
The assessment method for this part of the module is designed to meet the objectives of the module and facilitate its outcomes. The coursework will allow students to develop their research and data interpretation skills both as members of a team, in respect of the group presentation, and as individuals in respect of the written answers. The written part of the coursework will allow students to develop their legal writing skills. Students must ensure that they satisfy the assessment criteria their work will be marked against. The pass mark is 40%. Students will be assessed on the following examination assessment criteria:
1. Identification of the legal issue
2. Identification of all relevant areas of law
3. Demonstration of knowledge and understanding of relevant legal rules and case-law
4. Application of relevant law to the facts
5. Presentation
Grade A
· Precise identification of the legal issue.
· Precise identification of all the relevant areas of law.
· Demonstration of a thorough knowledge and understanding of the relevant principles and case law including a critical analysis thereof.
· Accurate application of law to question so as to address precisely legal issues raised therein.
· Use of authority (that is, cases and statutes) to support the arguments advanced and conclusions reached.
· Presentation of work which is legible.
· Clarity of expression.
Write a paper that describes the main aspects of the regulatory environment which will protect the public from fraud within corporations, Pay particular attention to SOX requirements. Required Elements: No more than 1400 words Specifically evaluate whether SOX will be effective in avoiding future frauds. Format consistent with APA guidelines Click the Assignment Files tab to submit your assignment.
Superconnected On the distant possibility that anybody is in charge of engendering the internet is a spot, it is likely John Perry Barlow. Alongside Mitchell Kapor, Barlow composed a pronouncement in July 1990 called "Over the Electronic Frontier" to declare the dispatch of the Electronic Frontier Foundation, a collective freedoms association
Defining and understanding the elements of a group culture is essential to forging a professional identity either online or in person. These elements are important because they reflect how professionals interact, whether online or in person.(pharmacy)
In this Assignment you will write a descriptive report about the culture of a group of people, a company, or an organization based on background research and an interview of a professional person who is part of that culture.
Assignment Instructions
Part 1
Search using individual internet research and write a report that investigates a cultural group in your desired field. Describe what the group is like in your own words.(pharmacy)
Part 2
Select and interview a professional person in your field of interest. Ask questions about this person’s group that will allow you to gain insights into aspects of the culture that he/she is a member of. Integrate the insights gained from the interview responses and your impressions into your written report.
Assignment Format
Cover page that includes your name, course and section number, date, and the Assignment title.
Five pages clearly typewritten in college-level American English text (3 pages background text, 2 pages describing what you learned from the interview).
One reference page listing sources you discovered in your background research and used to support your descriptive writing in Part 1 (use APA citation).
Attach your interview questions and notes as an appendix.
Academicpapers.net is a pioneering academic writing service with a customer base comprising of thousands of students. We have hundreds of expert writers aboard working in collaboration with a diligent quality assurance team.
Phone: +1 (940) 905 5542