The Eratosthenes sieve is a simple algorithm to find all prime numbers less than a given number. It proceeds as follow: make a collection of numbers between 2 and the given number (let's call it allNumbers) make an empty collection that will receive all the prime numbers (let's call it allPrimes) repeat until allNumbers is empty the following steps remove the first element of allNumbers, call it prime, and put it in allPrimes remove all multiple of prime from allNumbers print all numbers from allPrimes Implement this algorithm choosing appropriately what collections from the java.util package can be best for allNumbers and allPrimes. Explain your choices in your documentation. The deliverables are one Java class, allowing to run the sieve by passing the maximum number on the command line, the design document (no more than one page) explaining the choice of data structures, and a test document explaining how you check the correctness of your program. Grading rubrics: Design document: 20% clear explanation of the implementation choices (10% for each collection) Test document: 20% include 2 examples of runs with an explanation about how you checked the correctness of the results independently of the program. Do not include tests for incorrect input. Implementation: 20% (correct completion grade) Code structure: 20%.Use of proper Java constructs Presentation: 20% (see presentation rubric in week 1 assignment).

The biggest cost thing is their finance and some other expenses identified with "compensating" their workers. In this way anticipating this cost influences both the proficiency and adequacy of the association. Like all hierarchical movement, the pay program should be well thoroughly considered, sorted out, planned, assessed and controlled to protect that the fancied impacts are accomplished.

What standards should be used to establish a fair wage? Are the standards for executives different from those for hourly workers? What factors determine what someone deserves for pay?

Week 2

Discussion

Choose and respond to one
of the following questions:

Question A

Using two concepts
from the reading (e.g. polypotency, artifact/idea, STS, etc…), critique the
myth of moral neutrality of technology. Provide some reasons to the effect that
technological development can be morally good or bad.

Question B

Do you think that the
ties between social circumstances and technology, thoroughly discussed in the
readings, should be a part of the definition of “technology?” Why or why not?

Use at least two of
this week’s readings as resources in your initial post.

The project will consist of creating a simulation of an operating system scheduler handling multiple threads or processes. The student will create a program that launches 6 – 10 worker threads simulating a processor bound, I/O bound and an intermediate of the two types. The program will schedule the tasks using the First-Come, First-Served (FCFS), Shortest Job First, and Round Robin scheduling algorithms. The Program should be written in Java and the Round Robin algorithm should employ the suspend() and resume() thread methods (yes I know the methods are depreciated. Included as an attachment is a sample). The student will take statistics and will write a paper describing what they found. The paper should be approximately 7 – 10 double-spaced typed pages excluding source code listings, figures, charts, graphs, and tables. References are to be included but not counted as part of the 7 – 10 pages. The paper should be a complete description of your project, including the goals of your project, the approach you used, what you did, the statistics you gathered, what lessons you learned (what did not work as originally expected), and a conclusion. On the other hand, excessively long projects will not be favorably received.