What forces contributed to cultural makeup?

The term culture represents the shared values and beliefs of a group of people that develop over time and are passed from one generation to another. Culture can be seen in art, religious or spiritual beliefs, systems of laws, or the customs that comprise the way a group functions. Human culture, under this definition, dates back at least 30,000 years and probably much further. The Paleolithic (or Old Stone Age) cultures of Europe hunted wild game and gathered plants to sustain themselves, and their groups were small in number.

Initial Post: Write 100 words within the Discussion Board responding to the following questions. Create a substantive and clear post expressing your research, thoughts, and ideas:

Discuss the following questions with your peers:

  • What forces contributed to cultural makeup?
  • What social issues arose because of these cultural makeups?

100 words.

Read “The Story of an Hour” below. “The Jilting of Granny Weatherall” and “The Story of an Hour” share a universal theme, but the stories come to the same conclusion in very different ways. In a paragraph or two, explain what theme the stories share and how the authors approached the theme differently.

Question 3

  1. Read “The Story of an Hour” below. “The Jilting of Granny Weatherall” and “The Story of an Hour” share a universal theme, but the stories come to the same conclusion in very different ways. In a paragraph or two, explain what theme the stories share and how the authors approached the theme differently.

    Knowing that Mrs. Mallard was afflicted with a heart trouble, great care was taken to break to her as gently as possible the news of her husband’s death.

    It was her sister Josephine who told her, in broken sentences; veiled hints that revealed in half concealing. Her husband’s friend Richards was there, too, near her. It was he who had been in the newspaper office when intelligence of the railroad disaster was received, with Brently Mallard’s name leading the list of “killed.” He had only taken the time to assure himself of its truth by a second telegram and had hastened to forestall any less careful, less tender friend in bearing the sad message.

    She did not hear the story as many women have heard the same, with a paralyzed inability to accept its significance. She wept at once, with sudden, wild abandonment, in her sister’s arms. When the storm of grief had spent itself she went away to her room alone. She would have no one follow her. There stood, facing the open window, a comfortable, roomy armchair. Into this she sank, pressed down by a physical exhaustion that haunted her body and seemed to reach into her soul.

    She could see in the open square before her house the tops of trees that were all aquiver with the new spring life. The delicious breath of rain was in the air. In the street below a peddler was crying his wares. The notes of a distant song which some one was singing reached her faintly, and countless sparrows were twittering in the eaves.

    There were patches of blue sky showing here and there through the clouds that had met and piled one above the other in the west facing her window. She sat with her head thrown back upon the cushion of the chair, quite motionless, except when a sob came up into her throat and shook her, as a child who has cried itself to sleep continues to sob in its dreams.

    She was young, with a fair, calm face, whose lines bespoke repression and even a certain strength. But now there was a dull stare in her eyes, whose gaze was fixed away off yonder on one of those patches of blue sky. It was not a glance of reflection, but rather indicated a suspension of intelligent thought.

    There was something coming to her and she was waiting for it, fearfully. What was it? She did not know; it was too subtle and elusive to name. But she felt it, creeping out of the sky, reaching toward her through the sounds, the scents, the color that filled the air.

    Now her bosom rose and fell tumultuously. She was beginning to recognize this thing that was approaching to possess her, and she was striving to beat it back with her will — as powerless as her two white slender hands would have been. When she abandoned herself a little whispered word escaped her slightly parted lips. She said it over and over under her breath: “free, free, free!” The vacant stare and the look of terror that had followed it went from her eyes. They stayed keen and bright. Her pulses beat fast, and the coursing blood warmed and relaxed every inch of her body.

    She did not stop to ask if it were or were not a monstrous joy that held her. A clear and exalted perception enabled her to dismiss the suggestion as trivial. She knew that she would weep again when she saw the kind, tender hands folded in death; the face that had never looked save with love upon her, fixed and gray and dead. But she saw beyond that bitter moment a long procession of years to come that would belong to her absolutely. And she opened and spread her arms out to them in welcome.

    There would be no one to live for during those coming years; she would live for herself. There would be no powerful will bending hers in that blind persistence with which men and women believe they have a right to impose a private will upon a fellow-creature. A kind intention or a cruel intention made the act seem no less a crime as she looked upon it in that brief moment of illumination.

    And yet she had loved him—sometimes. Often she had not. What did it matter! What could love, the unsolved mystery, count for in the face of this possession of self-assertion which she suddenly recognized as the strongest impulse of her being!

    “Free! Body and soul free!” she kept whispering.

    Josephine was kneeling before the closed door with her lips to the keyhole, imploring for admission. “Louise, open the door! I beg; open the door—you will make yourself ill. What are you doing, Louise? For heaven’s sake open the door.”

    “Go away. I am not making myself ill.” No; she was drinking in a very elixir of life through that open window.

    Her fancy was running riot along those days ahead of her. Spring days, and summer days, and all sorts of days that would be her own. She breathed a quick prayer that life might be long. It was only yesterday she had thought with a shudder that life might be long.

    She arose at length and opened the door to her sister’s importunities. There was a feverish triumph in her eyes, and she carried herself unwittingly like a goddess of Victory. She clasped her sister’s waist, and together they descended the stairs. Richards stood waiting for them at the bottom.

    Someone was opening the front door with a latchkey. It was Brently Mallard who entered, a little travel-stained, composedly carrying his grip-sack and umbrella. He had been far from the scene of the accident, and did not even know there had been one. He stood amazed at Josephine’s piercing cry; at Richards’ quick motion to screen him from the view of his wife.

    When the doctors came they said she had died of heart disease — of the joy that kills.

Question 4

  1. The poem “The Mending Wall” by Robert Frost and the song “Hey You” by Pink Floyd share a common universal symbol. In a paragraph or two, explain how the symbol means the same thing in both stories and contrast how the poems use that symbol in different ways.

     

    “The Mending Wall” by Robert Frost

    Something there is that doesn’t love a wall,
    That sends the frozen-ground-swell under it,
    And spills the upper boulders in the sun,
    And makes gaps even two can pass abreast.
    The work of hunters is another thing:
    I have come after them and made repair
    Where they have left not one stone on a stone,
    But they would have the rabbit out of hiding,
    To please the yelping dogs. The gaps I mean,
    No one has seen them made or heard them made,
    But at spring mending-time we find them there.
    I let my neighbor know beyond the hill;
    And on a day we meet to walk the line
    And set the wall between us once again.
    We keep the wall between us as we go.
    To each the boulders that have fallen to each.
    And some are loaves and some so nearly balls
    We have to use a spell to make them balance:
    ‘Stay where you are until our backs are turned!’
    We wear our fingers rough with handling them.
    Oh, just another kind of out-door game,
    One on a side. It comes to little more:
    There where it is we do not need the wall:
    He is all pine and I am apple orchard.
    My apple trees will never get across
    And eat the cones under his pines, I tell him.
    He only says, ‘Good fences make good neighbors’.
    Spring is the mischief in me, and I wonder
    If I could put a notion in his head:
    ‘Why do they make good neighbors? Isn’t it
    Where there are cows?
    But here there are no cows.
    Before I built a wall I’d ask to know
    What I was walling in or walling out,
    And to whom I was like to give offence.
    Something there is that doesn’t love a wall,
    That wants it down.’ I could say ‘Elves’ to him,
    But it’s not elves exactly, and I’d rather
    He said it for himself. I see him there
    Bringing a stone grasped firmly by the top
    In each hand, like an old-stone savage armed.
    He moves in darkness as it seems to me~
    Not of woods only and the shade of trees.
    He will not go behind his father’s saying,
    And he likes having thought of it so well
    He says again, “Good fences make good neighbors.”

    “Hey You” by Roger Waters (Pink Floyd)

    Hey you, out there in the cold
    Getting lonely, getting old
    Can you feel me?
    Hey you, standing in the aisles
    With itchy feet and fading smiles
    Can you feel me?
    Hey you, don’t help them to bury the light
    Don’t give in without a fight.

    Hey you, out there on your own
    Sitting naked by the phone
    Would you touch me?
    Hey you, with your ear against the wall
    Waiting for someone to call out
    Would you touch me?
    Hey you, would you help me to carry the stone?
    Open your heart, I’m coming home.

    But it was only fantasy.
    The wall was too high,
    As you can see.
    No matter how he tried,
    He could not break free.
    And the worms ate into his brain.

    Hey you, standing in the road
    always doing what you’re told,
    Can you help me?
    Hey you, out there beyond the wall,
    Breaking bottles in the hall,
    Can you help me?
    Hey you, don’t tell me there’s no hope at all
    Together we stand, divided we fall.

 

(1-2 page) Essay Sociology Assignment- Evaluating Bias in Research

Assignment 1-2 page essay- Evaluating Bias in research on article that is attached with instructions for Sociology assignment.  Original work only. Please read through assignment instructions before bidding on this assignment.  Assignment is due this week.​

Assignment 1-Sociology.docx

In your opinion, what groups of people benefit most when the prison system is capitalized? What groups or people benefit least?

After reading the two articles addressing privatization, Arizona’s private prisons: A bad bargain and The case for privatizing California’s prisons, respond to each of the following questions:

  1. In your opinion, what groups of people benefit most when the prison system is capitalized? What groups or people benefit least?
  2. In your informed opinion, are private prisons a bargain? Why or why not? Has the general public reached the same conclusion? Why or why not?
  3. Has your opinion about private prisons changed as a result of this research?
  4. What problems come with privatizing traditional government services like incarceration, military work, or policing? What benefits?
  5. What do for-profit prisons say about society’s expectations of incarceration and criminal activity? What do they say about society’s opinion of inmates?

Your initial post should be at least 250 words in length. Support your claims with examples from the required material(s) and/or other scholarly resources, and properly cite any references.

Write an eight- to ten-page paper, in which you compare and contrast two literary works from this course that share the same theme

Write an eight- to ten-page paper, in which you compare and contrast two literary works from this course that share the same theme (using the “Themes & Corresponding Works” list, below, as a guide).

The paper should be organized around your thesis (argument), which is the main point of the entire essay. When developing a thesis for a comparative paper, consider how a comparison of the works provides deeper insight into the topic of your paper (i.e., think about why you have chosen to look at these particular works in relation to one another). In your analysis, consider the relationships among the following elements:

  • Content
  • Form (e.g., short story vs. poem)
  • Style

Assignment Requirements

  • Topic: Must address one of the topics in the guidelines
  • Length: Your draft should be eight to ten double-spaced pages in length (excluding title and reference page)
  • Sources: Utilize at least six scholarly sources to support your thesis (including the course text and at least two sources from the Ashford Online Library).
  • APA: Your draft must be formatted to APA (6th edition) style.
    • Separate Title Page: Must include an original title
    • Separate Reference Page
    • Proper Citations: All sources must be properly cited, both within the text and in a separate reference page.
  • Elements of Academic Writing:  All academic papers should include these elements.
    • Introduction with a thesis statement
    • Supporting paragraphs
    • Conclusion

Themes & Corresponding Works

Choose only two of the works within your selected theme.

  • Race / Ethnicity
    • Country Lovers (Gordimer)
    • The Welcome Table (Walker)
    • What It’s Like to Be a Black Girl (Smith)
    • Child of the Americas (Morales)
  • Gender Roles / Marriage
    • The Story of an Hour (Chopin)
    • The Necklace (de Mauppassant)
    • Country Lovers (Gordimer)
    • Gift of the Magi (Henry)
    • How I Met My Husband (Munro)
    • My Last Duchess (Browning)
    • Hills Like White Elephants (Hemingway)
    • Morning Song (Plath)
  • Creativity / The Creative Process
    • Poetry (Neruda)
    • Constantly Risking Absurdity (Ferlinghetti)
    • You, Reader (Collins)
  • Death and Impermanence
    • A Father’s Story (Dubus)
    • Do Not Go Gentle into that Good Night (Thomas)
    • Nothing Gold Can Stay (Frost)
    • In Memoriam (Tennyson)
    • Because I Could Not Stop for Death (Dickinson)
    • The Things They Carried (O’Brien)
    • The Hunger Artist (Kafka)
    • Ozymandias (Shelley)
    • Futility (Owen)
  • Nature
    • Wild Geese (Oliver)
    • Dover Beach (Arnold)
    • The Oak (Tennyson)
    • Hope is a Thing With Feathers (Dickenson)
    • Home to Roost (Ryan)
    • Fog (Sandberg)
  • Symbolism of the Journey
    • A Worn Path (Welty)
    • Good Country People (O’Conner)
    • Hay for the Horses (Snyder)

APA samples and tutorials are available to you in the Ashford Writing Center, located in the left navigation bar.

Analyze two major ways that each organization is addressing the social problem you have mentioned. For example, are they helping to create homeless shelters, are they helping people receive drug treatment, or are they working with state and local authorities to curb suffering in some area

construct a 2-4 page paper that fully satisfies these two areas:

  1. Based upon your topic chosen in the first assignment, or based upon an entirely new topic of your choice, describe two organizations (Feel free to do your own independent research on these organizations) that is seeking to address this social problem. (1-2 pages). Note: If you do change topics please get prior approval from you instructor.
  1. Analyze two major ways that each organization is addressing the social problem you have mentioned. For example, are they helping to create homeless shelters, are they helping people receive drug treatment, or are they working with state and local authorities to curb suffering in some area

 

similarities and differences between motivational interviewing techniques used in a counseling setting and persuasive techniques used in a business sales setting? 

What are some of the similarities and differences between motivational interviewing techniques used in a counseling setting and persuasive techniques used in a business sales setting?  What are the ethical considerations in each setting? Be sure to cite as appropriate, the online course, the textbook, and other credible, scholarly sources to substantiate the points you are making.  Apply APA standards for writing and citations to your work.

rite an essay to compare the Byzantine and Muslim centers of learning with the Western and Eastern cultural traditions of Rome and Asia during the first millennium.

Description

In this assignment, you will write an essay about the various major centers of learning in the latter half of the first millennium. These centers had tremendous influence on civilizations past and present. Writing this essay will give you an opportunity to see how the events of the age came to be and how they still have an impact in your life today.

Instructions

1.  Read the following article. Note that Istanbul is now the capital of Turkey. Formerly called Constantinople, it was the capital of the Byzantine Empire during the latter half of the first millennium. As you read the article, find in the example of Istanbul indications of the divisions between Eastern and Western cultures and the historical sources of these divisions.

http://find.galegroup.com/gps/infomark.do?contentSet=GSRC&docType=GSRC&type=retrieve&tabID=T001&prodId=IPS&docId=A150003346&userGroupName=apg_custom360&password=custom360&version=1.0&searchType=AdvancedSearchForm&source=gale&infoPage=infoMarkPage

2.  Write an essay to compare the Byzantine and Muslim centers of learning with the Western and Eastern cultural traditions of Rome and Asia during the first millennium. Consider these questions to guide your writing (Do not simply write a short answer to each question; you are writing a well-developed, coherent essay.):

      • Given that the Byzantine and Muslim worlds had so much more in common with Western culture than with Asian cultures, why are they currently considered Eastern?
      • How does the article illustrate the historical sources of the modern divisions between Western and Eastern cultural traditions?
      • How were Byzantium and Muslim centers of learning influential in the past?
      • How are those influences evident today culturally, politically, and in other ways? Provide specific examples.
      • Why do these influences matter? How do they affect your life?

3.  Be sure to adhere to the following writing guidelines:

      • Your essay must be between 3-4 pages in length.
      • Your essay must be double-spaced using 12-point font, with 1-inch margins.
      • Include your name at the top of the first page.
      • Proofread your essay to eliminate mechanical and grammatical errors.
      • For citations, follow APA format.

 

Write an Initial Response About the Issue Being Discussed

The Happiness Box

These Discussion Forums are an opportunity for us to be “doing” philosophy. The first time an individual tries to argue about issues he or she has rarely or never before discussed, the result may be awkward, clumsy, and frustrating. That is OK.

Often we think that we do not have a particular view on a subject, but once we state our position and begin to discuss it, we realize that we have a very definite view. But, we still may not have good reasons for believing it.

The way to explore your views and make them genuinely your own is by working with your views through reflection, stating them, publicly defending them, and committing yourself to them.

That is the point behind philosophical discussions in general; they to teach us how

to think about, articulate, and argue for the things we have come to believe in,

to clarify and perhaps revise our views, and

to present them in a clear and convincing manner to other people.

Very often, therefore, philosophy proceeds through disagreement, as when two philosophers or philosophy students argue with one another. But, polite differences of opinion are a good thing in the Discussion Forums. The key, however, is using politeness to cool down a discussion before it becomes over-heated.

Someone else may offer an argument which causes you to rethink your position and possibly even change your mind. Or, you may find that you have better reasons for being committed to your view than you originally thought and can share your new evidence with classmates who still are not sure about their own positions.

As we are ”doing” philosophy here in the Discussion Forums, the practical aspect is that we will learn more about ourselves and what we believe.

Some important rules to follow:

  1. There will be no Ad hominems (attacks against the person); not following this rule may result in failure of the assignment. You can disagree with a person’s opinions, but you may not attack other people. You may, however, disagree with the ideas of others, but do so in a constructive manner. For example, you can say, “I don’t agree with your post. I think instead that . . . ” But, you cannot say, “You’re an idiot” or even “That’s just plain stupid.” Academia requires a diversity of opinions but presented politely; after all, ethics is part of Philosophy.
  2. Avoid making statements meant to be absolute (such as, “There is no other way to think about this”). Instead of asking closed-ended questions looking for a “yes” or “no” or the “right” answer, ask open-ended questions (such as, “Have you thought about . . . ?”)
  3. Try to connect the current discussion to topics from other lessons. Remember that all of the Philosophers wrote about more than a single topic and the way they think about one area of Philosophy probably affects other areas as well. For example, it might be extremely useful to mention John Stuart Mill’s ethical theories from an earlier lesson during a later discussion of his support for women’s rights and equality.
  4. Rather than simply reacting to the readings and the responses of your classmates, think about the arguments being made. Really consider the effectiveness of these arguments. “I agree” responses are not useful to the discussion and will not receive credit.

Give some serious consideration to the topic or scenario before answering; and, then, using the questions below as a guide, write a 75-100 word initial response about the issue being discussed. Next, please take the time to respond to at least two of your classmates.

The Scenario

Engineering students at Grantham University have developed an exciting new machine—a box with some electrodes and a life-support system—which we call the “Happiness Box.” Only students in specific courses are invited to take advantage of this unique opportunity to participate, and we are inviting you to try it.

If you choose to get in the box, you will experience a powerfully pleasant sensation, which will continue indefinitely with just enough variation to keep you from getting too used to it. Additionally, you are not giving up your free will; if you later decide to do so, you can get out of the box any time you want to return to your previous lifestyle. It should be mentioned, however, that no one so far, once they have gotten into the Happiness Box, has ever wanted to get out of it.

After ten hours or so in the box, we hook up the life-support system, and people spend their lifetimes there. Of course, they never do anything else, so their bodies tend to resemble half-filled water balloons after a few years because of the lack of exercise. But that never bothers them either; they are so happy that their physical appearances and other superficial concerns no longer matter to them.

Finally, we also want to assure you that while you will not know they are there, your family will be able to visit your Happiness Box any time they miss you. We also would like to dispel any possible notions about machines trying to take over the world and creating a false reality for all human beings; that was a fictitious theme in a popular science fiction movie—which, incidentally, was written by people who were interested in and inspired by Philosophy.

Respond

Now, it is your decision, and we would like you to be very specific as you either accept or reject this opportunity.

  1. Would you like to accept the invitation and step into the Happiness Box?
  2. Explain your primary reason for accepting or rejecting the invitation to join the Happiness Box project.
  3. If you are accepting it, explain why you are likely (or not likely) planning to stay longer than 10 hours. (We need this information in order to make sure we have everything ready to set up the life support system.) Incidentally, what time will you be arriving?
  4. If you are rejecting the invitation, what additional information or considerations would you need to eliminate your apprehensions in order to accept this invitation?

THIS IS A WEEKLY DISCUSSION – INITIAL POST MUST BE 75 TO 150 WORDS BUT MAY GO LONGER DEPENDING ON THE TOPIC. PLEASE CITE ANY OUTSIDE SOURCES.

Assessing Other Educators’ Attitudes Toward Students’ Families/EDU647 Ashford Un

Read the teacher scenarios in reflective Exercise 2.5 Assessing Other Educators’ Attitudes Toward Students’ Families. Chose one of the following teachers to respond to: Teacher 1, Teacher 2, or Teacher 3. Summarize and critique what you would expect from this teacher if you were a parent of a student in their class. Then respond as if you were the principal/administrator of this teacher. Create a 3-5 page plan to include the following: How would you sway this teacher to understand the importance of a family/school partnership? What suggestions would you make to encourage your teacher to make positive change? What resources would you suggest to this teacher? Include ways to support this teacher as well. You must include at least two resources to support these suggestions to encourage a positive family/school partnership.