philosophy contribution to riots 1
How does philosophy speak to and contribute to our understanding the Freddie Gray riots?
How does philosophy speak to and contribute to our understanding the Freddie Gray riots?
Mountaintop removal seriously impacts the environment, but it also brings jobs and access to coal. Coal supplies nearly half of our electrical power plants. Do some research on mountaintop removal and compile a position paper to answer the following questions:
For your research, you can do an Internet keyword search on “mountaintop removal.” You can also use the website you saw on the previous page and these two sources, which present arguments from both proponents and opponents of mountaintop removal. You can take any position you want, but be sure to support your argument either for or against mountaintop removal with evidence from your research.
Assignment 4: Persuasive Paper Part 2: Solution and Advantages
Due Week 7
Using feedback from your professor and classmates, revise Part 1 and develop the solution and identify the advantages of the solution. Note: The disadvantages or challenges with your answers will be in Part 3.
Write a six to eight (6-8) page paper in which you:
Provide Part I: Revision of A Problem Exists (3-4 pages)
1. Revise, using feedback from the professor and classmates, your Persuasive Paper Part I: A Problem Exists.
Develop Part 2: Solution to Problem and Advantages (3-4 pages for 6-8 pages total)
2. Include a defensible, relevant thesis statement clearly in the first paragraph. (The thesis statement may need to be modified to reflect added information and purpose of this part.)
3. Explain a detailed, viable solution that supports your thesis. This should be one or two (1-2) paragraphs.
4. State, explain, and support the first advantage (economic, social, political, environmental, social, equitable, ethical/moral, etc.) to your solution. This should be one or two (1-2) paragraphs.
5. State, explain, and support the second advantage (economic, social, political, environmental, social, equitable, ethical/moral, etc.) to your solution. This should be one or two (1-2) paragraphs.
6. State, explain, and support the third (and fourth if desired) advantage (economic, social, political, environmental, social, equitable, ethical/moral, etc.) to your solution. This should be one or two (1-2) paragraphs.
7. Use effective transitional words, phrases, and sentences.
8. Provide a concluding paragraph / transitional paragraph that summarizes the proposed solution and its advantages.
9. Develop a coherently structured paper with an introduction, body, and conclusion.
10. Use one (1) or more rhetorical strategies (ethos, logos, pathos) to explain advantages.
11. Support advantage claims with at least three (3) additional quality relevant references. Use at least six (6) total for Parts 1 and 2. Note: Wikipedia and other Websites do not qualify as academic resources.
Your assignment must follow these formatting guidelines:
Note: Submit your assignment to the designated plagiarism program so that you can make revisions before submitting your paper to your professor.
The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:
|
Assignment 4: Persuasive Paper Part 2: Solution and Advantages |
|||||
|
Criteria |
 Unacceptable Below 60% F |
Meets Minimum Expectations 60-69% D |
 Fair 70-79% C |
 Proficient 80-89% B |
 Exemplary 90-100% A |
|
1. Revise, using feedback from the professor and classmates, your Persuasive Paper Part 1: A Problem Exists. Weight: 5% |
Did not submit or incompletely revised, using feedback from the professor and classmates, your Persuasive Paper Part 1: A Problem Exists. |
Insufficiently revised, using feedback from the professor and classmates, your Persuasive Paper Part 1: A Problem Exists. |
Partially revised, using feedback from the professor and classmates, your Persuasive Paper Part 1: A Problem Exists. |
Satisfactorily revised, using feedback from the professor and classmates, your Persuasive Paper Part 1: A Problem Exists. |
Thoroughly revised, using feedback from the professor and classmates, your Persuasive Paper Part 1: A Problem Exists. |
|
2. Include a defensible, relevant thesis statement clearly in the first paragraph. Weight: 5% |
Did not submit or incompletely included a defensible, relevant thesis statement clearly in the first paragraph. |
Insufficiently included a defensible, relevant thesis statement clearly in the first paragraph. |
Partially included a defensible, relevant thesis statement clearly in the first paragraph. |
Satisfactorily included a defensible, relevant thesis statement clearly in the first paragraph. |
Thoroughly included a defensible, relevant thesis statement clearly in the first paragraph. |
|
3. Explain a detailed, viable solution that supports your thesis. This should be one or two (1-2) paragraphs. Weight: 5% |
Did not submit or incompletely explained, in one or two (1-2) paragraphs, a detailed, viable solution that supports your thesis. |
Insufficiently explained, in one or two (1-2) paragraphs, a detailed, viable solution that supports your thesis. |
Partially explained, in one or two (1-2) paragraphs, a detailed, viable solution that supports your thesis. |
Satisfactorily explained, in one or two (1-2) paragraphs, a detailed, viable solution that supports your thesis. |
Thoroughly explained, in one or two (1-2) paragraphs, a detailed, viable solution that supports your thesis. |
|
4. State, explain, and support the first advantage (economic, social, political, environmental, social, equitable, ethical/moral, etc.) to your solution. This should be one or two (1-2) paragraphs. Weight: 10% |
Did not submit or incompletely stated, explained, and supported the first advantage (economic, social, political, environmental, social, equitable, ethical/moral, etc.) to your solution in one or two (1-2) paragraphs. |
Insufficiently stated, explained, and supported the first advantage (economic, social, political, environmental, social, equitable, ethical/moral, etc.) to your solution in one or two (1-2) paragraphs. |
Partially stated, explained, and supported the first advantage (economic, social, political, environmental, social, equitable, ethical/moral, etc.) to your solution in one or two (1-2) paragraphs. |
Satisfactorily stated, explained, and supported the first advantage (economic, social, political, environmental, social, equitable, ethical/moral, etc.) to your solution in one or two (1-2) paragraphs. |
Thoroughly stated, explained, and supported the first advantage (economic, social, political, environmental, social, equitable, ethical/moral, etc.) to your solution in one or two (1-2) paragraphs. |
|
5. State, explain, and support the second advantage (economic, social, political, environmental, social, equitable, ethical/moral, etc.) to your solution. This should be one or two (1-2) paragraphs. Weight: 10% |
Did not submit or incompletely stated, explained, and supported the second advantage (economic, social, political, environmental, social, equitable, ethical/moral, etc.) to your solution in one or two (1-2) paragraphs. |
Insufficiently stated, explained, and supported the second advantage (economic, social, political, environmental, social, equitable, ethical/moral, etc.) to your solution in one or two (1-2) paragraphs. |
Partially stated, explained, and supported the second advantage (economic, social, political, environmental, social, equitable, ethical/moral, etc.) to your solution in one or two (1-2) paragraphs. |
Satisfactorily stated, explained, and supported the second advantage (economic, social, political, environmental, social, equitable, ethical/moral, etc.) to your solution in one or two (1-2) paragraphs. |
Thoroughly stated, explained, and supported the second advantage (economic, social, political, environmental, social, equitable, ethical/moral, etc.) to your solution in one or two (1-2) paragraphs. |
|
6. State, explain, and support the third (and fourth if desired) advantage (economic, social, political, environmental, social, equitable, ethical/moral, etc.) to your solution. This should be one or two (1-2) paragraphs. Weight: 10% |
Did not submit or incompletely stated, explained, and supported the third advantage (economic, social, political, environmental, social, equitable, ethical/moral, etc.) to your solution in one or two (1-2) paragraphs. |
Insufficiently stated, explained, and supported the third advantage (economic, social, political, environmental, social, equitable, ethical/moral, etc.) to your solution in one or two (1-2) paragraphs. |
Partially stated, explained, and supported the third advantage (economic, social, political, environmental, social, equitable, ethical/moral, etc.) to your solution in one or two (1-2) paragraphs. |
Satisfactorily stated, explained, and supported the third advantage (economic, social, political, environmental, social, equitable, ethical/moral, etc.) to your solution in one or two (1-2) paragraphs. |
Thoroughly stated, explained, and supported the third advantage (economic, social, political, environmental, social, equitable, ethical/moral, etc.) to your solution in one or two (1-2) paragraphs. |
|
7. Provide a concluding paragraph / transitional paragraph that summarizes the proposed solution and its advantages. Weight:10% |
Did not submit or incompletely provided a concluding paragraph / transitional paragraph that summarizes the proposed solution and its advantages. |
Insufficiently provided a concluding paragraph / transitional paragraph that summarizes the proposed solution and its advantages. |
Partially provided a concluding paragraph / transitional paragraph that summarizes the proposed solution and its advantages. |
Satisfactorily provided a concluding paragraph / transitional paragraph that summarizes the proposed solution and its advantages. |
Thoroughly provided a concluding paragraph / transitional paragraph that summarizes the proposed solution and its advantages. |
|
8. Develop a coherently structured paper with effective transitional words, phrases, sentences and  an introduction, body, and conclusion. Weight: 10% |
Did not submit or incompletely developed a coherently structured paper with an introduction, body, and conclusion. |
Insufficiently developed a coherently structured paper with an introduction, body, and conclusion. |
Partially developed a coherently structured paper with an introduction, body, and conclusion. |
Satisfactorily developed a coherently structured paper with an introduction, body, and conclusion. |
Thoroughly developed a coherently structured paper with an introduction, body, and conclusion. |
|
9. Support advantage claims with at least three (3) additional quality relevant references (at least six (6) total for Parts 1 and 2). Weight: 10% |
No references provided |
Does not meet the required number of references; all references poor quality choices. |
Does not meet the required number of references; some references poor quality choices. |
Meets number of required references; most references high quality choices. |
Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices. |
|
10. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements Weight: 25% |
More than 8 errors present |
7-8 errors present |
5-6 errors present |
3-4 errors present |
0-2 errors present |
Final Exam
We looked at “Freedom†this week, but as the term ends, it is always a good idea to try to tie together different ideas in order to see the coherency.
While you are writing, please do not use the textbook or any outside materials. You can mention things in the textbook, but you will not have time to look them up. The paper you write is intended to give you the opportunity to express your philosophical viewpoints.
Please take a few minutes to read through the two choices for the first part, to choose one of them, to figure out your views, and to scribble down a skeleton outline for an argumentative essay. You will be trying to prove that your view is the best one.
Make sure you include:
After you have answered either Question A or Question B in Part 1, go to Part 2 and answer the single question there as well.
PART 1
In a well-developed short essay, address the prompts for one of the choices below:
Question A
Freedom and Morality. In Chapter 18 of The Prince, Machiavelli offers advice for future rulers: “Everyone admits how praiseworthy it is for a political leader to keep his word and to behave with integrity rather than cunning. Nevertheless, our experience has been that those leaders who have done great things have considered keeping their word of little account and have known how to beguile men’s minds by shrewdness and cunning. Occasionally, the words of leaders must serve to hide the facts. But the lies should be told in such a way that the general population does not become aware of them; or, if the lies are discovered, excuses must be ready at hand to be produced immediately. In the end, the leaders most likely to reach their goals and sway the people are those who have not relied on integrity or on keeping their word.â€
Contrastingly, Aristotle said that we are not free if our actions are caused or influenced by external compulsion (including deceit or insufficient evidence).
The old joke asks, “How can you tell a politician is lying?†And, the classic answer is, “His lips are moving.†Americans have always suspected that their politicians leaders tell falsehoods, and recent national leaders have even admitted that they “misspoke†(i.e., lied) on numerous occasions to the American people.
Define freedom in your own terms, specifically outlining those aspects of yourself that you consider the basis of your own conception of “acting freely.†To what extent can people truly be free if they are living in a society where their leaders routinely lie to them in order to gain the common man’s compliance? To what extent is it possible or impossible for a person to be “acting freely†when he lacks the relevant (and truthful) information needed for his decision-making? Explain which type of government you believe provides the most individual freedoms and that you personally believe would be more preferable to live in—an immoral and powerful government that lies to the people or a weak but moral government in which the leaders always tells the truth. Defend your position for why your choice is more desirable than the alternative.
Question B
Freedom and Self. Define freedom in your own terms, specifically outlining those aspects of yourself that you consider the basis of your own conception of “acting freely.â€
An idea we were left with from the textbook is that people are so largely influenced by both nature and nurture that it is difficult to make any sort of decision which has not already been affected by both internal and external influences; our “self identities†are not a creation of own but largely the product of biology and relationships. But, choosing to “act freely†implies that we are choosing freely, without influences affecting our choices.
Think back to our discussion of the “essential self†in Week 4 as you address the following questions. To what extent does your conception of “acting freely†include playing roles and interacting with other people? To what extent do other people limit your freedom? How can your “essential self†be free choose to “act freely†while living in a world in which you are bound by obligations to various kinds of other people? Under which conditions would you be confident to declare that you had freely chosen a “free act�
PART 2
In no more than one or two paragraphs, answer the following:
As you reflect on your work and your learning in this class, what has been the most important skill you have mastered, insight you have secured, or knowledge you have gained? With respect to the skill, insight, or knowledge you have identified, why is that thing important to you and in what ways, and to what ends will you be able to use it later on?
| Grading Criteria Assignments | Maximum Points |
| Meets or exceeds established assignment criteria | 40 |
| Demonstrates an understanding of lesson concepts | 20 |
| Clearly presents well-reasoned ideas and concepts | 30 |
| Mechanics, punctuation, sentence structure, spelling, APA formatting. | 10 |
| Total | 100 |
What was the name of the German advance in the ardenness
Trials Against Minors Committing Violent Crimes.docx
*** Please refer to Assignment Part 2 – Research, Proposal & Major Thesis to complete this assignment
Write a three to four (3-4) page paper in which you:
1,000–2,000 word document
Using the library, Internet, or any other resources as well as the operations strategy framework, explain how new additional services can be seamlessly integrated into Smith’s organization and the possibilities of outsourcing or offshoring work globally.
Include the following in your answer:
· MUST INCLUDE Connection to the operations strategy framework (business direction, offerings, resources, discriminators, competitive analysis, performance, customer needs, and operational metrics)
· MUST INCLUDE An example of a company or situation similar to Smith’s that has added and integrated additional service offerings through the use of outsourcing or offshoring and the impact of this approach
1. Graph the function y= 2/x .
Find the range of the function given that the domain of the function is all real numbers x, except x ≠0.  Draw a chart to show at least four ordered pairs that are on the graph.
2. Graph the y= x 2 + 2x – 3 and identify the range if the domain is all real numbers. Draw a chart to show at least three ordered pairs that are on the graph
INCLUDES BOTH GRAPHIC
Academicpapers.net is a pioneering academic writing service with a customer base comprising of thousands of students. We have hundreds of expert writers aboard working in collaboration with a diligent quality assurance team.

Phone: +1 (940) 905 5542
