Social entrepreneurship can take many forms from enterprises which are totally dedicated to benefiting society to those which have as part of their mission to do business in a socially responsible manner. In all cases, creating social benefits has been part of their initial mission and vision, not a corporate value which was added later because it was “good for business.” Entrepreneurs who focus on social issues have to meet the same challenges as any entrepreneurs but also have some unique challenges.

Identify an enterprise which was developed under the umbrella of social entrepreneurship. Examples of such enterprises include Edutopia, Everlane, TOMS Shoes, Grameen Bank, Seventh Generation, Safe Point Trust, One Acre Fund, and Teach For America. You may use any of these or find your own.

Write a paper of approximately two pages in which you analyze the organization and its founder, responding to the following questions:

• How did the founder(s) identify a need for their enterprise?
• What are the vision and mission of the enterprise?
• What skills and personal characteristics did the founder(s) bring to the enterprise?
• What challenges has the enterprise faced/still faces?
• How successful has the organization been in fulfilling its vision and mission and why?

thanks

For this Assignment, you will critically evaluate a scholarly article related to factorial ANOVA.

Use the following article

Article name: Attractive or Credible Celebrities: Who Endorses Green Products Better?

Authors:

Eren-Erdogmus, İrem a, ⁎

Lak, Hadi Salari a

Çiçek, Mesut b

Write a 2- to 3-page critique of the research you found in the Walden Library that includes responses to the following prompts:

• Why did the authors select factorial ANOVA in the research?
• Do you think this test was the most appropriate choice? Why or why not?
• Did the authors display the results in a figure or table?
• Does the results table stand alone? In other words, are you able to interpret the study from it? Why or why not?

The presentation of this case should be in IRAC structure.

Issue – Identify the issue(s)

Rule – Identify and explain/define the applicable rule, term, or concept

Analysis – Apply the applicable rule, term, or concept to the facts. And, present arguments for both sides.

Conclusion – Pick one side and give a conclusion

only use information that in the case i attached with the order. no information out of the case will be allowed. follow the Case evolution I attached to this order as guide.