Question I – Bono is a musician. He sells his neighbor a gently used lawn mower at a deeply discounted price. The neighbor is dissatisfied with the performance of the lawn mower. Can the neighbor sue Bono under the UCC §2-314, the implied warranty of merchantability? Why or why not?

Question II – If cigarette companies want to work with one another for a common interest, what is one example that would allow the cigarette companies to do so without violating the Sherman Act? What source of law protects the cigarette companies’ actions?

post should be at least 450+ words and in APA format (including Times New Roman with font size 12 and double spaced).

Please refer to this textbox: Jennings, M. M. (2017). Business: Its Legal, Ethical, and Global Environment (11th ed.). Cengage Learning

Note : no plagiarism please

The main objective of the assignment is to develop the knowledge of global and cultural systems and issues. For the assignment, you will identify and describe major global issues in financial markets and the effects of country–level risk. More specifically, you will analyze a U.S. manufacturer and provide solutions after developing a strong understanding of international financial management, exchange systems, and foreign currency derivatives. This assignment is an ideal problem–based assignment in that it requires you to apply the knowledge and skills you learn throughout the semester. You will evaluate Blades (a manufacturer of roller blades) that has recently begun exporting roller blades to Thailand. This assignment asks you to compare global issues and analyze the exchange systems because Blades tries to reduce foreign exchange risk. In the assignment, you will provide the chief financial officer (CFO) of Blades a better understanding of the process of government intervention and its impact on Blades’ international business. Read Read the case and class slides carefully and answer the questions provided. You need to limit your Global Citizens Assignment in two pages using single space. Refer to the rubric for assessment in Canvas to know my grading criteria.

1. Write a reading report only for this article you have read~

Dudbridge, Glen. The Hsi-yu Chi; a Study of Antecedents to the Sixteenth-century Chinese Novel. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1970.

• A study of the sources of The Journey to the West. Although there’s been much new scholarship since this was published, it’s still interesting and useful. Read the “Introduction” and one or more of the other chapters—or the whole thing.
• Two pages lengthe for the main article (doesnt include references and title), double spaced, times new roman, size 12.

2. Some articles for applying graduate in columbia

(1) statement of purpose for actuarial science

700 words

(2) statement of purpose for applied analytics

700 words

(3) supplemental essay:

In no more than 250 words, describe a challenge related to data or analytics that you have encountered. How did you work to resolve this challenge and did you succeed?

Attached is the supplemental one I provide, you can revise on that or write things completely new~

Long-Term Care Management

Assignment 1: A Legal and Ethical Dilemma

Due Week 3 and worth 250 points

Deciding to place a loved one into a long-term care facility can be extremely difficult. Even more difficult is the thought of your loved one’s rights being violated while in long-term care. Patient healthcare rights are not as clearly defined as one would expect, and there are long-term care and other healthcare facilities that create their own sets of patient rights. However, there are also certain indisputable rights afforded to patients across the board.

Read the case study titled “A Legal and Ethical Dilemma”, located on pages 463-465 of your text. Next, use the Internet or Strayer Library to research information on a patient’s right to die.

Write a four to six (4-6) page paper in which you:

• Describe the legal and ethical dilemma discussed in the case study. Analyze the key ways in which a patient’s right to die relates to this specific case.
• From your research, specify the potential repercussions for failure to comply with the wishes of a patient who has requested to withhold a life-sustaining procedure. Next, take a position on whether the patient’s right to die or the patient’s right to be protected from harm should take precedence in this case. Provide a rationale for your position.
• Imagine that you are a part of the ethics committee investigating this case. Determine the main facts pertaining to the issue that the committee should consider. Suggest one (1) step that the facility should take next in order to resolve the dilemma. Provide a rationale for your response.
• Use at least three (3) quality academic resources. Note: Wikipedia and other similar websites do not qualify as academic resources.

Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:

• Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
• Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.

The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:

• Identify the factors that have led to the current realities of long-term care in the United States.
• Assess the various stakeholder groups of long-term care along with the nature of the relationship(s).
• Evaluate the impact of litigation on long-term care providers and practices.
• Use technology and information resources to research issues in long-term care management.
• Write clearly and concisely about long-term care management using proper writing mechanics.

Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic / organization of the paper, and language and writing skills.

	Assignment 1: A Legal and Ethical Dilemma
Criteria	Unacceptable Below 70% F	Fair 70-79% C	Proficient 80-89% B	Exemplary 90-100% A
1. Describe the legal and ethical dilemma discussed in the case study. Analyze the key ways that a patient’s right to die relates to this specific case. Weight: 30%	Did not submit or incompletely described the legal and ethical dilemma discussed in the case study. Did not submit or incompletely analyzed the key ways that a patient’s right to die relates to this specific case.	Partially described the legal and ethical dilemma discussed in the case study. Partially analyzed the key ways that a patient’s right to die relates to this specific case.	Satisfactorily described the legal and ethical dilemma discussed in the case study. Satisfactorily analyzed the key ways that a patient’s right to die relates to this specific case.	Thoroughly described the legal and ethical dilemma discussed in the case study. Thoroughly analyzed the key ways that a patient’s right to die relates to this specific case.
2. From your research, specify the potential repercussions for failure to comply with the wishes of a patient who has requested to withhold a life-sustaining procedure. Next, take a position on whether the patient’s right to die or the patient’s right to be protected from harm should take precedence in this case. Provide a rationale for your position. Weight: 25%	Did not submit or incompletely specified the potential repercussions for failure to comply with the wishes of a patient who has requested to withhold a life-sustaining procedure. Did not submit or incompletely took a position on whether the patient’s right to die or the patient’s right to be protected from harm should take precedence in this case. Did not submit or incompletely provided a rationale for your position.	Partially specified the potential repercussions for failure to comply with the wishes of a patient who has requested to withhold a life-sustaining procedure. Partially took a position on whether the patient’s right to die or the patient’s right to be protected from harm should take precedence in this case. Partially provided a rationale for your position.	Satisfactorily specified the potential repercussions for failure to comply with the wishes of a patient who has requested to withhold a life-sustaining procedure. Satisfactorily took a position on whether the patient’s right to die or the patient’s right to be protected from harm should take precedence in this case. Satisfactorily provided a rationale for your position.	Thoroughly specified the potential repercussions for failure to comply with the wishes of a patient who has requested to withhold a life- sustaining procedure. Thoroughly took a position on whether the patient’s right to die or the patient’s right to be protected from harm should take precedence in this case. Thoroughly provided a rationale for your position.
3. Determine the main facts pertaining to the issue that the committee should consider. Suggest one (1) step that the facility should take next in order to resolve the dilemma. Provide a rationale for your response. Weight: 25%	Did not submit or incompletely determined the main facts pertaining to the issue that the committee should consider. Did not submit or incompletely suggested one (1) step that the facility should take next in order to resolve the dilemma. Did not submit or incompletely provided a rationale for your response.	Partially determined the main facts pertaining to the issue that the committee should consider. Partially suggested one (1) step that the facility should take next in order to resolve the dilemma. Partially provided a rationale for your response.	Satisfactorily determined the main facts pertaining to the issue that the committee should consider. Satisfactorily suggested one (1) step that the facility should take next in order to resolve the dilemma. Satisfactorily provided a rationale for your response.	Thoroughly determined the main facts pertaining to the issue that the committee should consider. Thoroughly suggested one (1) step that the facility should take next in order to resolve the dilemma. Thoroughly provided a rationale for your response.
4. 3 references Weight: 10%	No references provided	Does not meet the required number of references; some or all references poor quality choices.	Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices.	Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices.
5. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements Weight: 10%	More than 6 errors present	5-6 errors present	3-4 errors present	0-2 errors present

Thoreau’s essay, On the Duty of Civil Disobedience, sets forth his concerns about the Mexican-American War, existence, and expansion of slavery in the United States in the mid-1800s. His conscience and beliefs compelled him to act on behalf of people he would never meet. Additionally, his beliefs, Transcendentalism, meant that he believed that to be a physical prisoner behind bars who acted on his morals and concerns makes him more “free” than someone who is physically free to come and go but fails to act in a manner consistent with his moral beliefs due to a lack of courage, apathy, or similar failing.

I ask you now to do something similar. Please identify a societal or political issue that would motivate you to undertake actions of civil disobedience (disobeying the law, orders, or presidential directives, etc.). Specify the issues, what acts of civil disobedience you would pursue, and how you believe it would have any effect on the issues you specified.

The submission should be two pages of double-spaced text plus references and in-text citations (both of which should be in APA format). Your submission shall be at least three pages long (two pages of text, one page of references – no requirement for a cover page, abstract, etc.