Select a patient with endocrine disorder that you examined during the last 3 weeks. With this patient in mind, address the following in a SOAP Note: Evaluation and Management of sleep disorder in pediatric.

•Subjective: What details did the patient provide regarding his or her personal and medical history?

•Objective: What observations did make during the physical assessment?

•Assessment: What were your differential diagnoses? Provide a minimum of three possible diagnoses. List them from highest priority to lowest priority. What was your primary diagnosis and why? Include evidence from the ROS and /or where you came up with diagnosis

•Plan: What was your plan for diagnostics and primary diagnosis? What was your plan for treatment and management including alternative therapies? Include references of evidence based .

REFERENCES

Please use textbooks, national guidelines and journals articles < 5 years as references, avoid uptodate, amyo and Cleveland Clinic emed, webMD, Medscape as they are resources, no nd or no date, find the date or do not use

plz no plagiarism at all my instructor is really serious about it

read all the following description

– there is a PDF guide in the attachments & example that you have follow to write this essay. plz review it

Writing Requirements

This assignment is the first of four steps in completing the military memorandum. This assignment will require you to articulate an understanding of the problem and the audience, by answering the questions about the problem below. Then you will demonstrate an ability to solve, understand, and explain a statistical problem in language appropriate to the professional status and background of the audience you are addressing by completing a draft of your military memorandum. To understand what you are expected to do in the memorandum review the Military Memorandum Guide. You may also want to look at the rubric on assignment 1.4 to see how the final assignment in this memorandum series will be graded. The linked Military Memorandum Pre-writing Example provides an illustration of how the assignment should be laid out. You will be expected to follow the provided format for presenting the material, a practice that will extend into your professional life. You are expected to use editing software to review your work for grammar and punctuation errors prior to turning it in.

Problem Definition Questions

Read the problem description at the bottom of this assignment. Then, cut and paste each question below into your assignment and provide the answers below each question. These answers will be located on a separate page before the memorandum. This page will NOT be included in the final memorandum.

1. What problem you have been asked to address? While you are using statistics to support a particular answer, the question you are being asked to address is not a formula or a description of the calculations you will complete. You need to describe the problem you are being asked to solve in plain language.
2. How can the data provided inform an intervention recommendation?
3. What is the outcome you are supposed to provide in this memorandum?
4. a) To whom have you been asked to address this memorandum (find the name of the CURRENT person holding the job and their official title)? b) What is this person likely to need from you? (You may need to do a quick internet search of this role.)
5. a) Who will you be copying this memorandum to (they are a secondary audience). b) What are the addressees likely to need from reading the memorandum? (This is a critical thinking exercise, so research what the addressees’ responsibilities are and use that to think about what they need to know from you).

Problem Description:

The United States military has been involved as a peace-keeping force in a humanitarian effort to prevent further genocide in the country of Lorian. Many soldiers have died in this effort. The government has recently approved the use of emergency funds to reduce the loss of soldiers’ lives, but funding will only support one initiative. The officer in charge of the theater of operations, your commanding officer, has asked you, a military engineer, rank of Lieutenant, to evaluate the situation and recommend a course of action to reduce the number of soldier fatalities and enable the peace-keeping force to remain in place. Analyze the provided data regarding soldier fatalities in a one-month period and make a recommendation regarding what the government and military should do.

Audience: Any time you prepare a professional document, you should consider the audience (Links to an external site.)that you are writing the document for. You should tailor the content, language, tone, and structure of the document to the audience you are addressing. This document is being prepared for senior-level government and military members. Ask yourself what they can be reasonably expected to know about this topic, and what they need to know to make an informed decision. Address the memorandum to The Current United States Secretary of Defense (Find the current Secretary of Defense’s name and title).

Provide carbon copies (cc)’s to:

• The House of Representatives Defense Subcommittee
• The United States Senate Defense Subcommittee

Tone: The Audience for this document requires that the style (Links to an external site.) is precise and professional.

• Utilize plain language when describing your analysis, as you cannot assume all readers will be statistically literate. However, there are also some who will understand statistics and will want to understand the statistical logic that you used to determine your recommendation.
• Start the document with a summary that readers can read to understand the essential elements of the document – the context of the issue, what is being examined and how, and the recommendation you will make.
• Develop the document around a direct, coherent message (thesis), (Links to an external site.)and clear evidence (Links to an external site.)to support it.
• Do not use contractions, slang or colloquialisms (Links to an external site.), clichés (Links to an external site.), abbreviations, or text message shortcuts.
• Edit and check grammar and spelling before turning the document in.

Data: The attached data spreadsheet documents the causes of the deaths of soldiers who died in the most recent full month. Each number on the attached spreadsheet identifies the cause of the death of one soldier who died in that month. The cause of death represented by each number is identified in the table below. Use the data from the entire month in your calculations.

Soldier Fatalities Data

Data Coding:

Cause of Fatality	Code
Typhus	1
Dysentery	2
Cholera	3
Staph infection	4
Fragment wound	5
Burn wound	6
Gunshot wound	7
Exploding ordnance wound	8
Blood hemorrhage	9

Be sure to look at the assignment rubric to assure that you have completed the required elements prior to turning in the assignment,(i will send it in seconds)

PLZ LMK if u have any question

View the movie Gattaca. Write a paragraph answering each of
the following questions

1. 
How would Kant evaluate Freeman’s assumption of
Jerome Eugene Morrow’s identity from the perspective of the first formulation
of supreme principle of morality?

2. 
How would Kant evaluate Vincent Freeman’s assumption
of Jerome morrow’s identity from the perspective of the second formulation
principle of morality?

3. 
Vincent Freeman’s assumption of Jerome Eugene
Morrow’s identity can also be viewed as a conflict of duties. What duties would
be in conflict, and how could Kant resolve the conflict?

4. 
As a rule utilitarian, how would Mill evaluate
Vincent Freeman’s assumption of Jerome Eugene Morrow’s identity?

5. 
Vincent Freeman’s assumption of Jerome Eugene
Morrow’s identity can also be viewed as a conflict of rules. What rules would
be in conflict and how would Mill resolve the conflict?

Interview a purchasing and supply management professional in a private or public organization (for example a purchasing and supply associate, buyer, data analyst, picker, manager, operations manager, Inventory planner, a Chief Purchasing Officer or any like title in the list found in Weeks 2, 3 or 4 in This Week in Business News).

Write a 3-5-page paper that describes:

1. 1. 1. The line of business, mission, and goals of the organization he/she works for. Describe these briefly.
      2. The description of his/her job functions and job responsibilities, educational background, professional experiences, personal challenges, job achievement, and fulfillment.
      3. The operational and strategic objectives of the supply and purchasing department.
      4. How the above supply objectives align with the organizational mission and goals.

The format of the report is to be as follows:

• • • Typed, double spaced, Times New Roman font (size 12), one-inch margins on all sides (APA format).
    • Use headers for each of the subjects being covered, followed by your response.
    • In addition to the three to five (3-5) pages required, a title page is to be included. The title page is to contain the title of the assignment, your name, the instructor’s name, the course title, and the date.

Suppose someone argues for skepticism like this: People have different beliefs. People disagree about how old the world is; whether there is life on other planets; and even whether Bigfoot exists. So there’s really no truth about how old the world is; whether there’s life on other planets; or even whether Bigfoot exists. 

Use the relevant course readings to evaluate the force of this argument. (You should be able to determine which are relevant.) Is this argument for skepticism a good one? What does your judgment with respect to that last question mean for belief in skepticism based on arguments like the one I just presented? Should we form beliefs based on arguments like this? 

This is a 4 to 5 page paper, though you may certainly write more than that. Cite the text to support your claims. Write the paper is if it were a college paper. See the rubric in learning web for guidance

How Not to Write a Term Paper

  Barring the obvious bad strategies for ‘writing’ a term paper, viz. plagiarizing, writing on a topic that is not assigned, etc., how should a student not write a term paper? My term paper process begins this way: I ask a tough question and require students to answer it using course tools. A bad approach is to look and see what smart people have said about that question and then to write me a report on what those smart people have said. The papers look like this: “So-and-so said such-and-such and I think that person is right. After all, (insert an explanation of what So-and-so has said in different words from those So-and-so used.)”Why is this a bad approach?

  Think of the skill levels involved in learning any new concepts. The most primitive level is that of imitation. Children hold up two fingers after their parents do so. Marginally more sophisticated is when  children hold up the right fingers when asked to show us how many fingers make two. Then there is identification. Children learn to point to representations of the number ‘2’ and deem them twos. This might be two fingers held up, the standard English character for the number, Roman numerals and so on. This level is primitive because it requires little knowledge of how to use the number two. When the child can count to two or by twos, the child has acquired a slightly more sophisticated grasp of the concept ‘two’. When the child learns to explain the role of the number two in ordering, pairing, and so on, the child has an even more sophisticated level of understanding. If and when the child has acquired the ability to do these things on his/her own, s/he has mastered the concept in question.

  Now think back to a term paper that finds answers someone else has given and tells me about what that person has said. At what analogous level of sophistication is this paper? Well, it does identify uses of philosophical concepts. However, it does not show that the student can use the concepts on his/her own. It does not show that the students can use the concepts to answer tough questions. It does not show that the student is able to use and explain the concepts s/he was to learn to use and explain.

A philosophy paper is not an attempt to show that you can translate one English sentence into another. If your paper is simply a presentation of what someone else said ‘in your own words’, as so many students love to say, what you have not demonstrated is that you can actually use the concepts to answer questions. You have only demonstrated two things. First, and at best, you have demonstrated that you can identify when other people have used the concept correctly. Second, you have demonstrated that you can translate what the other person said into sentences that preserve the same meaning. This ability is irrelevant to this class. Philosophy is not a course on translations. I do not give points for converting English propositions into English propositions.

When I grade papers, I regard the demonstration of primitive levels of comprehension as nothing better than a C. You are actually better off trying to use the concepts to answer the questions on your own, even if you do not do as well as the paper on which you would love to do a book report. The strategy I am being critical of here limits you; you cannot do better than C-level work if you employ it. If you at least try to employ course concepts at sophisticated levels, you are able to show that you have a more complex understanding of the ideas than if you only try to engage in primitive uses of course concepts.

Try to answer the questions on your own. Use our course tools as a tool to do so. Do not write a book report that shows you can do things I am not particularly interested in teaching you to do. Do not limit yourself with a bad approach.

Grading Rubric 1. Does this paper identify have a clear thesis? (5%) 2. Does this paper contain only relevant information? Are the citations completed properly? (5%) 3. Does the paper attribute the correct view to the philosophers in question? (10%) 4. Is/are the philosopher’s view presented with the appropriate level of detail? (For example, does the author explain concepts and arguments in a tight manner, or are the arguments and concepts merely sketched?) (25%) 5. Does the author present a clear argument in his/her discussion? (15%) 6. Does the paper cohere? Or, is the paper a hodgepodge of disparate ideas? (10%) 7. Does the conclusion tie together the different phases of the paper? Or, is the conclusion a non-sequitur? (5%) 8. Are the spelling, grammar and syntax on the college level? (5%) 9. Does the author make appropriate and accurate use of course concepts in constructing his or her discussion? (20%) Intangibles: Is the paper on the assigned topic? 

ANOTHER LINK FOR READINGS http://fitelson.org/epistemology/derose.pdf