AssignmentTutorOnline In case of high Turnitin similarity scores, markers analyse the similarity…

AssignmentTutorOnline

In case of high Turnitin similarity scores, markers analyse the similarity score on a case by case basis and you will see relevant comments in your assignment, if necessary.

Late submission penalties are being applied to this assignment as per the university regulations.

Any students deemed to have conducted Academic Misconduct are being reported and will be informed of the outcome of the investigation and any related penalties via their student email address.

Each student must complete the 3 minutes tutorial presentation in either week 2 or 4, before submitting this assessment to receive a feedback on assessment 1.1.

Criteria

0                      (Not Shown)

1                      (Poor)

2                      (Unsatisfactory)

3                      (Satisfactory)

4                      (Good)

5                      (Very Good)

6                      (Excellent)

1. Clarity                  and suitability of statement of ‘field of research’ 10%

No                    field of research included or inappropriate field of research and                   /or no mention of the profession.

Field                 of research statement is highly unclear and/or entirely unsuitable                         and/or no mention of the profession.

Field                 of research statement is unclear and/or unsuitable and/or no                 mention of the profession.

Reasonable                       field of research statement that is, however, not entirely clear                         and/or suitable. Profession may be implied rather than clear.

Generally                  good field of research statement but may lack consistency, clarity                       and/or suitability. Relevance to the profession is mentioned.

Very                  clear field of research statement with suitable relevance to the                         profession explained.

Field                 of research statement is entirely clear and suitable with                      faultless and integrated explanation of relevance to the                         profession.

2. Suitability                     of data sources ( raw                    publicly available secondary data sources/links ) 20%

No                    data sources included or attempt to use academic literature as                       data.

Highly                       unclear or highly unsuitable data sources included and/or very                  poorly explained.

Unclear                     or unsuitable data sources included and/or poorly explained.

Based                       on the explanation, this project may contain suitable data sources                      but this requires further explanation to be fully clear.

Suitable                    data sources although more clarity and/or better explanation is                    required.

Suitable                    data sources included although some minor inconsistencies and/or                      unclear areas.

Highly                       suitable data sources included and well explained.

3.                     Research questions 20%

Entirely                     unsuitable or irrelevant RQs or missing.

Incomplete                         OR insufficiently presented OR inappropriate for the topic OR too                   vague/too many

Incomplete                        OR insufficiently presented OR inappropriate for the topic OR too                     vague/too many

Effective                    presentation of RQs; may be inconsistent or somewhat unclear

Convincing                        presentation of RQs; may be slightly inconsistent or unclear

Highly                       competent presentation of RQs; consistent and clear

Superior                    presentation of RQs;  entirely consistent and clear

4.                     Search terms 10%

Missing                     or entirely unsuitable or irrelevant.

Incomplete                         OR insufficiently presented OR inappropriate for the topic OR too                   vague/too many

Incomplete                        OR insufficiently presented OR inappropriate for the topic OR too                     vague/too many

Effective                    search terms; may be somewhat inconsistent or unclear.

Convincing                        search terms; may be slightly inconsistent or unclear.

Very                  good search terms; consistent and clear.

Excellent                   search terms; well thought through and logical; fully consistent                 and clear.

5. Ability                  to integrate sources into academic writing 20%

No                    academic sources used or no appropriate sentences written or no                        reference list included.

Less                  than 3 academic sources used and/or very poor integration into                         sentences and/or very poor reference list.

Less                  than 3 academic sources used and/or poor integration into                 sentences and/or poor reference list.

3                      academic sources placed into reasonable sentences although not                   well integrated; satisfactory referencing skills.

3                      academic sources placed into well written sentences although not                     well integrated; good referencing skills.

3                      academic sources reasonably well integrated into well-written                       sentences; very good referencing skills.

3                      (or more) academic sources integrated very well into sophisticated                     sentences with faultless referencing.

6. Professional                 presentation and accuracy of work 20%

Highly                       unprofessional work in terms of formatting, writing and/or                      referencing. Inaccurate.

Unprofessional                         work in terms of formatting, writing and/or referencing.                         Inaccurate.

Unprofessional                  work in terms of formatting, writing or referencing. Inaccurate.

Satisfactory                       and reasonably accurate work in terms of formatting, writing and                   referencing. More professionalism is required.

Generally                  professional and accurate work in terms of formatting, writing and                        referencing. Some mistakes and/or omissions may be present.

Very                  professional and accurate work in terms of formatting, writing and                        referencing. Minor errors and/or omissions are acceptable.

Highly                       professional work in terms of formatting, writing and referencing.                       Faultlessly accurate.