case review 8

A case review will be posted and students are expected to write a comprehensive review of the case where they are discussing both the areas of legal concern and explaining in their own words why the case was remanded to another court as well as providing a detailed review of how they personally see the ethical dilemmas brought forward in the case. It is acceptable to go against the judge’s ruling as in this review you are being viewed as the judge. Make sound reasoning for your decision. This review should be a minimum of 3 pages of body. If you reference any court cases in your review a citation will need to be made. Use APA style for your paper.

Students are expected to write a comprehensive review of the case where they are discussing both the areas of legal concern and explaining in their own words why the case was remanded to another court as well as providing a detailed review of how they personally see the ethical dilemmas brought forward in the case. It is acceptable to go against the judges ruling as in this review you are being viewed as the judge. Basically, do you agree or disagree with the judgement and what would you do differently and why. Make sound reasoning for your decision.

You will notice that there is not a specific page limit or writing style. That is on purpose. I want to know from your comprehensive review how YOU feel about the case. There are both legal and ethical decisions that need to be made in this case. This is a case that is based heavily in legal process with massive emotional issues throughout. You are graded off of your review by proper grammar and writing and how you are able to state your opinion on what you felt about the case and what you would do if you were the deciding judge. Make sure to provide detail in your review that shows the time and attention you have taken to make you

HERE IS THE URL TO THE CASE: https://www.leagle.com/decision/19941417648so2d76911277.xml