consolidated edison inserted material in favor of nuclear power in monthly bills sent to its electricity customers the public service commission of new york ruled/

1. The court held the company could discuss controversial political issues. Should a distinction be drawn between political speech paid for by private persons and that paid for by customers who may not want the speech? The political inserts in this case were paid for by Con Ed customers who buy electricity.
2. Would you distinguish between speech that address issues and corporate political speech that endorses particular candidates for office?