CRJ 311 week 4 DQ 1

  

Ashford 5: – Week 4 – Discussion 1

Bite Mark Evidence

  

   Bite marks are no longer considered a way to specifically identify someone,   but it can be used to exclude or include a person of interest. As a juror on   a homicide case, you have heard an odonotologist discuss the bite mark   evidence located on the victim and how the suspect cannot be excluded as to   whom the bite mark belongs. Review the bite mark photo (below).
 

 

  If your last name begins with A-L, argue your opinion as to how the bite mark   would possibly exclude the suspect.
 

  If your last name begins with M-Z, argue your opinion as to how the bite mark   would possibly include the suspect.
 

  The body of your initial post should be at least 250 words in length. Support   your claims with examples from this week’s required material(s) and/or other   scholarly resources, and properly cite any references.
 

  Respond to at least two of your classmates’ posts by Day 7. Respond to at   least one classmate who has been assigned the opposite opinion of yours. In   your responses, provide evidence to support your opinion. Each response   should be a minimum of 100 words and should include your thoughts associated   with their posted information. Additionally, you are to contribute to the   discussion by adding support or constructive alternatives to your classmates’   posts.