Discuss-the-way-in-which-Chimel-v-California-1969-defined-what-officers-may-search

Required*** Read the 5-8 ( https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B6VpIiDHS-nhYjVzN…)

APA Format***

1) Discuss the way in which Chimel v. California (1969) defined what officers may search, when they may search, and why. Why such directives are necessary and how they help individual suspects but may hinder police activity. How else might search parameters be defined?

Min 200 words response

2) Discuss police discretionary powers when deciding whether to use force and the amount of force to use. Include in your response the following:

  1. A high profile case scenario involving a police officer’s discretionary powers to use lethal force.
  2. Summarize the facts of the case.
  3. Define probable cause. Did officers have clear probable cause to initiate contact with the individual?
  4. Was the use of force warranted in that case? If yes, explain your thought process. If no, articulate alternative solutions to the use of force.
  5. In this case scenario did the community respond to the use of lethal force? What was the overall sense of the the community’s response? Did they make any demands of the police department?
  6. What was the final outcome? (Were charges filed against the officer’s in the use of lethal force? If yes what was the outcome? If no, do you support the decision not the charge the officer’s? Explain your reasoning.
  7. Min 400 words response

***Please Cite the book and any outside sources.