do you find the fazal poast argument an effective critique of goldstein s work why not
Goldstein from his book “Winning the War on War: The Decline of Armed Conflict Worldwide” relies on data, but presents what I think is fair to say is a fairly rosy view of war trends. Fazal and Poast argue the opposite side here: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/2019-10-15/war-not-over
Goldstein:
Read their brief critique of the “war in decline” argument and answer:
1. Do you find the Fazal/Poast argument an effective critique of Goldstein’s work? Why/not?
Doesn’t have to be a one page. just a solid answer
