leadership philosophy paper 2

For this Portfolio Project, write your own philosophy of leadership. Be sure to draw from your knowledge of your leadership and communication skills. Include responses to the following prompts as part of your essay:

• My personal philosophy of leadership is…
• The purpose of my leadership is to…
• The best leaders can be described as…
• For me to be an authentic leader, I need to…

Note: Feel free to use first person language in this assignment.

Remember, you must support your thinking/opinions and prior knowledge with references; all facts must be supported; in-text references used throughout the assignment must be included in an APA-formatted reference list. Include five to seven references cited in the assignment. Include at least two peer-reviewed articles as reference sources.

• Review the grading rubric, which can be accessed through the Module 3 folder.
• Your paper should be eight to ten pages long (This does not include the cover page, table of contents or references) and adhere to CSU-Global Writing and APA Guidelines (Links to an external site.).

• This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Preliminary Deliverables	50.0 to >40.0 pts Meets Expectation Delivered outline in Week 2. 40.0 to >30.0 pts Approaches Expectation Delivered outline in Week 2 as required with a significant omission or error. 30.0 to >20.0 pts Below Expectation Delivered outline in Week 2 as required, but with multiple omissions or errors. 20.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence Did not deliver outline in Week 2 as required.	50.0 pts
  This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Requirements	30.0 to >24.0 pts Meets Expectation The Portfolio includes all of the required components, as specified in the assignment. 24.0 to >18.0 pts Approaches Expectation The Portfolio includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment. 18.0 to >12.0 pts Below Expectation The Portfolio includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment. 12.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence The Portfolio includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment.	30.0 pts
  This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Content	30.0 to >24.0 pts Meets Expectation Demonstrates strong or adequate knowledge of their leadership philosophy; correctly represents knowledge from the readings and sources. 24.0 to >18.0 pts Approaches Expectation Some significant but not major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge. 18.0 to >12.0 pts Below Expectation Major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge. 12.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials.	30.0 pts
  This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Decision-Making	30.0 to >24.0 pts Meets Expectation Demonstrates strong or adequate thought and insight in decision-making regarding their leadership philosophy. 24.0 to >18.0 pts Approaches Expectation Some significant but not major errors or omissions in decision-making. 18.0 to >12.0 pts Below Expectation Major errors or omissions in decision-making. 12.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence Fails to demonstrate decision-making.	30.0 pts
  This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Synthesis and Evaluation	25.0 to >20.0 pts Meets Expectation Demonstrates strong or adequate synthesis and evaluation of course concepts in authentic leadership. 20.0 to >15.0 pts Approaches Expectation Some significant but not major errors or omissions in synthesis and evaluation. 15.0 to >10.0 pts Below Expectation Major errors or omissions in synthesis and evaluation. 10.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence Fails to demonstrate synthesis and evaluation.	25.0 pts
  This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Problem Solving	25.0 to >20.0 pts Meets Expectation Demonstrates strong or adequate thought and insight in problem solving regarding authentic leadership and their leadership philosophy. 20.0 to >15.0 pts Approaches Expectation Some significant but not major errors or omissions in problem solving. 15.0 to >10.0 pts Below Expectation Major errors or omissions in problem solving. 10.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence Fails to demonstrate problem solving.	25.0 pts
  This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Sources	25.0 to >20.0 pts Meets Expectation Cites and integrates at least 5-7 credible sources. 20.0 to >15.0 pts Approaches Expectation Cites and integrates 3-4 credible sources. 15.0 to >10.0 pts Below Expectation Cites and integrates 1-2 credible source. 10.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence Cites and integrates no credible sources.	25.0 pts
  This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Application of Source Material	25.0 to >20.0 pts Meets Expectation Sources well or adequately chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue; knowledge from the course linked properly to source material. 20.0 to >15.0 pts Approaches Expectation Some significant but not major problems with selection and linkage of sources. 15.0 to >10.0 pts Below Expectation Major problems with selection and linkage of sources. 10.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence Source selection is seriously flawed; no linkage to knowledge from the course.	25.0 pts
  This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Organization	20.0 to >16.0 pts Meets Expectation Project is clearly organized, well written, and in proper essay format including an introduction, body, and conclusion. Conforms to project requirements. 16.0 to >12.0 pts Approaches Expectation Small number of significant but not major flaws in organization and writing; is in proper essay format. In a minor way does not conform to project requirements. 12.0 to >8.0 pts Below Expectation Major problems in organization and writing; does not completely follow proper essay format. In a significant way does not conform to project requirements. 8.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence Project is not well organized or well written and is not in proper essay format. Does not conform to project requirements.	20.0 pts
  This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Grammar and Style	20.0 to >16.0 pts Meets Expectation Strong sentence and paragraph structure; few or no minor errors in grammar and spelling; appropriate writing style; clear and concise with no unsupported comments. 16.0 to >12.0 pts Approaches Expectation Small number of significant but not major errors in grammar and spelling; generally appropriate writing. 12.0 to >8.0 pts Below Expectation Inconsistent to inadequate sentence and paragraph development; work needed on grammar and spelling; does not meet program expectations. 8.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence Poor quality; unacceptable in terms of grammar and/or spelling; inappropriate writing style that interferes with clarity.	20.0 pts
  This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Demonstrates proper use of APA style.	20.0 to >16.0 pts Meets Expectation Project contains proper APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA Requirements, with no more than one significant error. 16.0 to >12.0 pts Approaches Expectation Few errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA Requirements, with no more than two to three significant errors. 12.0 to >8.0 pts Below Expectation Significant errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA Requirements, with four to five significant errors. 8.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence Numerous errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA Requirements, with more than five significant errors.	20.0 pts
  Total Points: 300.0