Please see attachment for instructions Write an essay in which you analyze the rhetorical strategies

Please see attachment for instructions Write an essay in which you analyze the rhetorical strategies of the author in the article “Reproductive Justice is Every Woman’s Right” published in 2006 in NOW Magazine. BE SURE to include a Work Cited with the article cited as an article in a magazine. You don’t have to cite it as a PDF. DON’T FORGET INTERNAL CITATIONS! Write an introductory paragraph that summarizes the argument, and has the name of the author and title of the article in quotation marks. Include a thesis–it should be your last sentence in the intro. You are arguing whether or not the author argued effectively, so your thesis will say, “In [“Title of Article”], columnist Bob Jones effectively argues [you may add how he argues] that global warming is a real and present danger.” In two or three fully-developed body  the writer’s use of analogy, questions, evidence, description and narrative, or personal experience as support for his or her claim and reasons (logos, pathos); provide evidence in the form of quotes; the writer’s credibility and authority(ethos); provide evidence; the match between the genre and the argument, and the genre and the audience; the audience of the argument; and the writer’s word choice and level of formality; provide evidence. Conclude w Here is a suggested organization for your analysis paper, which is the next assignment. It should be 1,000 or more words: 1. Introduction–Summarizes the topic or issue, has the name of the writer or speaker, the title of the piece in quotation marks, and a thesis. Your thesis says something like this: In “(Title of Article)”, environmentalist Susie Smith effectively argues with facts and data that global warming is a clear and present danger. The introduction ALSO provides comments about ethical appeal. EX: Smith’s experience includes fifteen years investigating and writing about the environment for science journals. It can also provide context. EX: Barrack Obama wrote this speech when he was running for president, and his campaign focused on improving international relationships. 2. Body Paragraphs–Generally two or three fully-developed paragraphs. (That means approximately 11-13 sentences PER PARAGRAPH). Each topic sentence gives us a point the author makes OR a rhetorical technique the author uses. I.E.: In the first half of her essay, Smith incorporates data from recognized scientists to prove rising temperatures and lowering water levels. (You would then support that assertion with evidence from the piece, and an elaboration of how the evidence proves your point that this is effective and logical.) Focus on: ·      the writer’s use of analogy, questions, evidence, description and narrative, or personal experience as support for hie or her claim (logos or pathos);  ·      the writer’s credibility and authority (ethos)–note that unless the entire argument is based on ethos, this fits well in the introduction; ·      the match between genre and argument–was an opinion piece in the NY Times the appropriate place to publish; ·      the audience (who they are and why the choice of argument makes it effective or not); ·      the writer’s word choice and level of formality. 3. Conclusion–Generally sums up THE AUTHOR’S argument again, (not yours), to remind us what we were talking about, and reminds us again that he/she was effective (or not.) It’s hard to avoid repetition here–take a breath and think about what you have just written. What was the author trying to say and how, and what were you trying to say? So, four to five well-developed and well-supported paragraphs WITH APPROPRIATE IN-TEXT CITATIONS (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. to give credit to the author. I DO NOT require a Works Cited when we all write on the same article, but for this assignment, I need to know your source. Attach an MLA Works Cited in a separate page. (Hit CTRL ENTR to create a page break.) You WILL NOT use other sources for this paper! This is rhetorical analysis for ONE article, so your ONLY source is the article you are analyzing. Therefore, you will need a Works Cited, but it will ONLY have this one source. For help with the Works Cited, go to Purdue OWL (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. Here is a suggested organization for your analysis paper, which is the next assignment. It should be 1,000 or more words: 1. Introduction–Summarizes the topic or issue, has the name of the writer or speaker, the title of the piece in quotation marks, and a thesis. Your thesis says something like this: In “(Title of Article)”, environmentalist Susie Smith effectively argues with facts and data that global warming is a clear and present danger. The introduction ALSO provides comments about ethical appeal. EX: Smith’s experience includes fifteen years investigating and writing about the environment for science journals. It can also provide context. EX: Barrack Obama wrote this speech when he was running for president, and his campaign focused on improving international relationships. 2. Body Paragraphs–Generally two or three fully-developed paragraphs. (That means approximately 11-13 sentences PER PARAGRAPH). Each topic sentence gives us a point the author makes OR a rhetorical technique the author uses. I.E.: In the first half of her essay, Smith incorporates data from recognized scientists to prove rising temperatures and lowering water levels. (You would then support that assertion with evidence from the piece, and an elaboration of how the evidence proves your point that this is effective and logical.) Focus on: ·      the writer’s use of analogy, questions, evidence, description and narrative, or personal experience as support for hie or her claim (logos or pathos);  ·      the writer’s credibility and authority (ethos)–note that unless the entire argument is based on ethos, this fits well in the introduction; ·      the match between genre and argument–was an opinion piece in the NY Times the appropriate place to publish; ·      the audience (who they are and why the choice of argument makes it effective or not); ·      the writer’s word choice and level of formality. 3. Conclusion–Generally sums up THE AUTHOR’S argument again, (not yours), to remind us what we were talking about, and reminds us again that he/she was effective (or not.) It’s hard to avoid repetition here–take a breath and think about what you have just written. What was the author trying to say and how, and what were you trying to say? So, four to five well-developed and well-supported paragraphs WITH APPROPRIATE IN-TEXT CITATIONS (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. to give credit to the author. I DO NOT require a Works Cited when we all write on the same article, but for this assignment, I need to know your source. Attach an MLA Works Cited in a separate page. (Hit CTRL ENTR to create a page break.) You WILL NOT use other sources for this paper! This is rhetorical analysis for ONE article, so your ONLY source is the article you are analyzing. Therefore, you will need a Works Cited, but it will ONLY have this one source. For help with the Works Cited, go to Purdue OWL (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. file:///C:/Users/User/Downloads/ReproductiveJusticeisEveryWomansRight.pdf