Risk Management on a Satellite Development Project, Case Study help

/in /by

MUST BE ORIGINAL AND PASS TURNITIN.

Case Study 3: Risk Management on a Satellite Development
Project

Read the attached case titled: “Risk Management on a Satellite Development
Project”.

Write a six to eight (6-8) page paper in which
you:

  1. Suggest
    the issues that could have developed had the team not had a risk plan.
    Determine the major impacts of risk that the team needs to understand for
    the project to be successful.
  2. Justify
    the value of risk plan considering the time, effort, cost, and resources it
    took to develop such a plan. If you were the project manager, recommend
    the approach that you would take to ensure the project met the critical
    path identified.
  3. Assess
    how to determine the level of risk management appropriate for a project.
  4. Imagine
    the team working on the satellite development project was a virtual team
    in which team members were unable to meet in person. Explain the expected
    impact on the project, and suggest two (2) ways the team could maintain
    its current goal in both planning and execution.
  5. Use
    at least five (5) quality
    academic (peer-reviewed) resources in this assignment.

Your assignment must:

  • Be
    typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch
    margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or
    school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional
    instructions.
  • Include
    a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name,
    the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and
    the reference page are not included in the required assignment page
    length.

The specific course learning outcomes
associated with this assignment are:

  • Estimate
    project costs and associated risks associated with each cost.
  • Use
    technology and information resources to research issues in managing human
    resource projects.
  • Write
    clearly and concisely about managing human resource projects using proper
    writing mechanics.

Grading for this assignment will be based on
answer quality, logic/organization of the paper, and language and writing
skills, using the following rubric.

Case
Study 3: Risk Management on a Satellite Development Project

Criteria

Unacceptable

Below
70% F

Fair

70-79%
C

Proficient

80-89%
B

Exemplary

90-100%
A

1.
Suggest the issues that could have developed had the team not had a risk
plan. Determine the major impacts of risk that the team needs to understand
for the project to be successful.

Weight:
10%

Did
not submit or incompletely suggested the issues that could have developed had
the team not had a risk plan. Did not submit or incompletely determined the
major impacts of risk that the team needs to understand for the project to be
successful.

Partially
suggested the issues that could have developed had the team not had a risk
plan. Partially determined the major impacts of risk that the team needs to
understand for the project to be successful.

Satisfactorily
suggested the issues that could have developed had the team not had a risk
plan. Satisfactorily determined the major impacts of risk that the team needs
to understand for the project to be successful.

Thoroughly
suggested the issues that could have developed had the team not had a risk
plan. Thoroughly determined the major impacts of risk that the team needs to
understand for the project to be successful.

2.
Justify the value of risk plan considering the time, effort, cost, and
resources it took to develop such a plan. If you were the project manager,
recommend the approach that you would take to ensure the project met the
critical path identified.
Weight: 20%

Did
not submit or incompletely justified the value of a risk plan considering the
time, effort, cost, and resources it took to develop such a plan. Did not
submit or incompletely recommended the approach that you would take to ensure
the project met the critical path identified, if you were the project
manager.

Partially
justified the value of a risk plan considering the time, effort, cost, and
resources it took to develop such a plan. Partially recommended the approach
that you would take to ensure the project met the critical path identified,
if you were the project manager.

Satisfactorily
justified the value of a risk plan considering the time, effort, cost, and
resources it took to develop such a plan. Satisfactorily recommended the
approach that you would take to ensure the project met the critical path
identified, if you were the project manager.

Thoroughly
justified the value of a risk plan considering the time, effort, cost, and
resources it took to develop such a plan. Thoroughly recommended the approach
that you would take to ensure the project met the critical path identified,
if you were the project manager.

3.
Assess how to determine the level of risk management appropriate for a
project.

Weight:
25%

Did
not submit or incompletely assessed how to determine the level of risk
management appropriate for a project.

Partially
assessed how to determine the level of risk management appropriate for a
project.

Satisfactorily
assessed how to determine the level of risk management appropriate for a
project.

Thoroughly
assessed how to determine the level of risk management appropriate for a
project.

4.
Explain the expected impact on the project, and suggest two (2) ways the team
could maintain its current goal in both planning and execution.

Weight:
30%

Did
not submit or incompletely explained the expected impact on the project, and
suggested two(2) ways the team could maintain its current goal in both
planning and execution.

Partially
explained the expected impact on the project, and suggested two (2) ways the
team could maintain its current goal in both planning and execution.

Satisfactorily
explained the expected impact on the project, and suggested two (2) ways the
team could maintain its current goal in both planning and execution.

Thoroughly
explained the expected impact on the project, and suggested two (2) ways the
team could maintain its current goal in both planning and execution.

5.
Five (5) References

Weight:
5%

No
references provided.

Does
not meet the required number of references; some or all references poor
quality choices.

Meets
number of required references; all references high quality choices.

Exceeds
number of required references; all references high quality choices.

6.
Clarity and writing mechanics

Weight:
10%

More
than 6 errors present

5-6
errors present

3-4
errors present

0-2
errors present