use the MORAL Decision-Making model to complete Learning Exercise, assignment help

Assignment 3 Please use the grading rubric to create an outline of your assignment. Each section of the rubric should be a section of your final paper and could become the headings. Your assignment will be graded based on each element of the rubric. Compare each section of your paper with the rubric to ensure all elements are covered. Then, include an introduction and conclusion to tie the paper together. If you have any questions regarding the assignment please contact your instructor using the Course Help forum. In a 2-3 page paper in APA format, use the MORAL Decision-Making model to complete Learning Exercise titled “A Nagging Uneasiness” in the course text (Marquis & Huston, 2014). Assignment 3 Rubric 0 points Points Earned Competency 16 points 10 points 6 points Massage the Dilemma Explains the data that needs to be collected about the ethical problem and specifies who should be involved in the decisionmaking process Describes some of the data that should be collected about the ethical problem and who should be involved in the decision-making process Poorly explains the data that should be collected about the ethical problem or does not say who should be involved in the decisionmaking process Values Clarification Examines and describes own values as the nurse in the case study Identifies possible values as the nurse in the case study No paper Poor description of submitted values of the nurse /16 and/or content in the case study missing Constructs alternatives, and analyzes Outline Options the causes and consequences of each identifies some alternatives, and analyzes some of the causes and consequences of each Names few alternatives, and does not analyze the causes and consequences of each No paper submitted /16 and/or content missing Review Criteria Weighs the Weighs few Identifies the No paper No paper submitted /16 and/or content missing /16 and Resolve Affirm Position and Act. Look Back options against the values of those involved in the decision Fully develops an implementation strategy. Evaluates the decision Competency of the options against the values of those involved in the decision options but does submitted not weigh against and/or content the values of those missing involved in the decision Implementation Describes an strategy is No paper implementation incomplete or submitted strategy. Simply missing. Evaluation and/or content describes the of the decision missing decision made made is incomplete 2 points 1 point /16 Points Earned 0 point 4 points Organization Organization excellent, ideas clear and arranged logically, transitions smooth, no flaws in logic. Grammar Grammar, punctuation, mechanics, and usage correct and idiomatic, consistent with Standard American English Competency 5 points References Organization good; ideas usually clear and arranged in acceptable sequence; transitions usually smooth, good support. Organization minimally effective; Organization problems in does not meet /4 approach, requirements. sequence, support and transitions. Grammar, Grammar, Grammar, punctuation, punctuation, punctuation, mechanics, and mechanics and mechanics, usage good usage and usage mostly consistent distracting and interfere with with Standard often interfere with understanding /4 American meaning or English; errors do understanding not interfere with meaning or understanding 3 points References are Adequate relevant, 1 point Minimal use of appropriate Points Earned 0 point Poor use and/or /5 authoritative and contemporary. Competency APA Format 7 points Demonstrates competent use of mechanics and APA. references. 5 points Minimal APA errors. references. 2 points Many APA errors. selection of references not relevant. 0 point Complete lack of /7 understanding. Total Submission status Points Earned /100 …