Workplace-Based Field Research Paper A on the Ethical Tools and Processes of Your Organization, paper help

Note: Students must choose either Option 1 or Option 2 for this assignment.

Option 1: Workplace-Based Field Research Paper A on the Ethical Tools and Processes of Your Organization

Purpose: To focus attention on the strengths and weaknesses of the ethical toolkit of your own organization.

Submit
a paper in MS Word not to exceed five pages in length that specifies in
detail the ethical tools and processes used in your organization (or an
organization with which you easily can become familiar) using the RDCAR
framework. Where do you find any particular robustness, weaknesses, or
gaps? For an additional perspective you may also choose to discuss the “Selected Questions” listed in Tables 5.1 and 5.2 in Chapter 5 in your textbook as part of this assignment.

Click the hyperlink below for the format of the paper.

Research Paper

This
workplace research assignment will require you to become familiar with
ethical policies, procedures, and structures within your organization
and the people who have designed, managed, and used them. As part of
this assignment you are expected to interview one or more senior level managers
to gain additional insights, after first developing a basic
understanding of your own organization’s ethical toolkit. We recommend
that you begin to gather as much information as you can during this week
as it is due by the end of Week 3.

Note: This option must include a one-page addendum that will serve as an appendix to your workplace-based research paper.

Appendix for Option 1
Pick one
U.S. based firm from the list (and links) below. Become familiar with
the firm’s publicly available statements about its ethics programs and
practices. Do you think these statements are valuable? Do you think they
accurately represent the firm’s impact on its stakeholders and the
environment? Where possible, use the RDCAR framework presented in Week
One as well as your own judgment to identify areas of strength or
weakness.

This analysis can be utilized as another basis of
comparison as you write about your own organization’s ethical programs
and practices.

Compose your answer as a MS Word document.

Option 1 Grading

Research Paper

80%

Appendix

20%

Option 2: Workplace-Based Field
Research Paper B on the Evaluation of Your Organization’s Commitment to
People and the Environment

Purpose: For
this option, you will be required to gather first-hand knowledge in
order to analyze the strengths and weaknesses of discretionary
activities taken by your firm as they relate to the domain of “corporate
social and environmental responsibility.” You are encouraged to become
familiar with both the people and the programs directly focused on this
task through interviews and reviews of available documents. It will be
useful to initially trace the history, scope and development of these
commitments as they relate to your organization, its stakeholders, and
the specific industry in which it operates. Through your interviews and
research, you should carefully delineate any gaps you find between
stated purposes and actual accomplishments, as well as potential ways to
improve performance. Finally, you are asked to think creatively about
your firm’s corporate social and environmental responsibility platform
as a whole, and to suggest novel ways in which it could be realistically
and successfully enhanced.

Note: This option must include a one-page addendum that will serve as an appendix.

Appendix For Option 2
Pick one
firm from the list (and links) below. Become familiar with the firm’s
publicly available descriptions and reports about its Corporate Social
Responsibility activities. Do you think these programs present solid and
credible information on how the firm serves the best interests of
people and the environment? Where do you see unique strengths or
identifiable weaknesses?

This analysis can be utilized as
another basis of comparison as you evaluate your own organization’s
commitment to corporate responsibility.

Compose your answer as a MS Word document.

Option 2 Grading

Evaluation Paper 80%
Appendix 20%