Assignment Instructions

ASSIGNMENT: Educate Consumers on Patient Portal Usage

CAHIIM Competency: Subdomain III.F. Consumer Informatics. 

Educate consumers on patient-centered health information technologies

Instructions: After reading the material for the week, create an educational flyer for patients at a 10-physician outpatient clinic. The information should explain the clinic’s patient portal. Be sure to cover what it is, how to register for it, and the features of the portal. List the benefits of using the portal. The goal is to convince consumers of the value of using the portal and increase usage.

For some research, you might want to search for resources on a real patient portal vendor. If your health service provides this service, you can also use them as a research example to create your flyer.

The flyer can be composed using MS Word or PowerPoint.

 

The field of nursing has changed over time. In a 750‐1,000 word paper, discuss nursing practice today by addressing the following: Explain how nursing practice has changed over time and how this evolution has changed the scope of practice and the approach to treating the individual. Compare and contrast the differentiated practice competencies between an associate and baccalaureate education in nursing. Explain how scope of practice changes between an associate and baccalaureate nurse. Identify a patient care situation and describe how nursing care, or approaches to decision‐making, differ between the BSN‐prepared nurse and the ADN nurse. Discuss the significance of applying evidence‐based practice to nursing care and explain how the academic preparation of the RN‐BSN nurse supports its application. Discuss how nurses today communicate and collaborate with interdisciplinary teams and how this supports safer and more effective patient outcomes.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. References:https://www.nursingworld.org/practice-policy/scope-of-practice/.  A cohort study was carried out in order to evaluate the evolution of nursing students’ perception of stressors associated with clinical practice. Sixty-nine students answered the KEZKAK questionnaire about nursing stressors [Zupiria X., Uranga M.J., Alberdi, M.J., Barandiaran, M., 2003b. Kezkak: cuestionario bilingüe de estresores de los estudiantes de enfermería en las prácticas clínicas. Gac. Sanit. 17 (1), 37-51.] at four stages of their studies. The most powerful stressors identified by students both at the beginning and at the end of their studies were: lack of competence, uncertainty and impotence, being harmed by the relationship with patients, emotional involvement, lack of control in relationships with patients, contact with suffering, relationships with tutors and companions, and overload. Nevertheless, most of the stressors were found to lose stressor power during the course of nursing training. The evolution of the perception of stressor power and its implications for nurse training are discussed, and some recommendations based on our findings are provided.Library GCU- Evidence based practice.

  Using the format outlined on the PICO reference page in the Nursing Reference Center design your own question. (This may be related to something you are familiar with, or something you imagine to be an issue in nursing. It is BEST if you keep it simple!) Next research reliable data bases or websites and find three articles that are related to your PICO (these MUST BE referenced on your reference page). Analyze the articles – write one paragraph about the similarities and/or differences in the articles related to your PICO.

Your Essay should be outlined by using steps 1-3 of the EBP process. 

Submit your completed assignment by following the directions linked below. Please check the Course Calendar for specific due dates.

Save your assignment as a Microsoft Word document. (Mac users, please remember to append the “.docx” extension to the filename.) The name of the file should be your first initial and last name, followed by an underscore and the name of the assignment, and an underscore and the date. An example is shown below:

Jstudent_exampleproblem_101504

1. Nurses’ perspectives on workplace mistreatment: A qualitative study.Full Text Available Academic JournalVagharseyyedin, Seyyed Abolfazl ; Nursing & Health Sciences, Mar2016; 18(1): 70-78. 9p. (Article) ISSN: 1441-0745, Database: CINAHL Complete

Subjects: Workplace Violence; Nurse Attitudes; Nursing Staff, Hospital; Bullying; Adult: 19-44 years; Middle Aged: 45-64 years; Male; Female

 Nurse exposure to physical and nonphysical violence, bullying, and sexual harassment: A quantitative reviewPaul E. SpectorCorrespondence information about the author Paul E. Spector Email the author Paul E. Spector , Zhiqing E. Zhou, Xin Xuan Che   Homework:Critique of Research Studies – Part 1: Due Topic 4

For Part 1 of the critique, focus only on the following segments for each article:

Quantitative

Qualitative

·          Title

·          Title

·          Abstract

·          Abstract

·          Introduction

·          Introduction

o    Statement of the problem

o    Statement of the problem

o    Hypotheses or research questions

o    Research questions

o    Literature review

o    Literature review

o    Conceptual/theoretical framework

o    Conceptual underpinnings

 

    

              

            DETAILS : (Please visit the website http://www.healthypeople.gov/ ) to do the assigment.. Please    the   assigment has to be free of Plagiarism.

 

This is a Collaborative Learning Community (CLC) assignment.

 

It is important to promote the professional role of the nurse to provide health promotion and disease preventive care. Collaborating with other health care professionals and consumer groups in the community in redesigning health care can help meet the goals for Healthy People 2020.

Refer to http://www.healthypeople.gov/ to open the Healthy People 2020 home page.Select the”Topics & Objectives” : Immunization and Infectious Diseases           

 

Develop a PowerPoint presentation (15-20 slides) with accompanying speaker’s notes and citations.

For help designing PowerPoint slides, refer to the “Create Your First Presentation” PowerPoint tutorial, located on the Microsoft website:

https://support.office.com/en-us/article/Create-your-first-presentation-ac88d138-a7a0-402c-b5a5-812641e59c8e?ui=en-US&rs=en-US&ad=US

In the presentation, address the following:State the objective of the presentation.State the Healthy People 2020 focus area your group has selected and the rationale for selection of the specific focus area.Explain how the focus area relates to the individual, the family, and the community, as well as to all age groups throughout the life span.Identify ways to enhance or optimize health in the selected focus area using evidence-based research. A minimum of three peer-reviewed articles must be utilized.Address the health disparity among different segments of the population for the selected focus area.Provide a brief description of at least two community resources and at least two website resources for professionals and clients.Provide a brief profile of at least one health-related organization for the selected focus area.

APA format is required for essays only. Solid academic writing is always expected.

 

For all assignment delivery options, documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

 

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

 

                                               Rubric

 

CLC – Health Promotion and Community Resource Teaching Project
 1
Unsatisfactory 0% – 71%
0.00%2
Less than Satisfactory 72% – 75%
75.00%3
Satisfactory 76% – 79%
79.00%4
Good 80% – 89%
89.00%5
Excellent 90% – 100%
100.00%40.0 %Content  7.0 % Objective of Presentation Stated. Healthy People 2020 Focus Area and Rational for Its Selection Stated objective of presentation and/or the selected Healthy People 2020 focus area, along with the rationale for selection of the specific focus area, are not stated.Stated objective of presentation and the selected Healthy People 2020 focus area, along with the rationale for selection of the specific focus area, are offered, but they are incomplete, lacking relevant information.Stated objective of presentation and the selected Healthy People 2020 focus area, along with the rationale for selection of the specific focus area, are offered at a basic level with limited detail.Stated objective of presentation and the selected Healthy People 2020 focus area, along with the rationale for selection of the specific focus area, are offered in detail.Stated objective of presentation and the selected Healthy People 2020 focus area, along with the rationale for selection of the specific focus area, are offered in detail, providing insight and/or reflection.7.0 % Explanation of the Selected Focus Area as It Relates to All Age Groups Throughout the Life Span Explanation of the selected focus area as it relates to all age groups throughout the life span is not offered.Explanation of the selected focus area as it relates to all age groups throughout the life span is offered, but it is incomplete, lacking relevant information.Explanation of the selected focus area as it relates to all age groups throughout the life span is accurate.Explanation of the selected focus area as it relates to all age groups throughout the life span is accurate and offered in detail.Explanation of the selected focus area as it relates to all age groups throughout the life span is accurate and offered in detail, while offering insight and/or reflection.7.0 % Identification of Ways to Enhance or Optimize Health in the Selected Healthy People 2020 Focus Area Using Evidence-Based Research With a Minimum of Three Peer-Reviewed Articles Identification of ways to enhance or optimize health in the selected Healthy People 2020 focus area using evidence-based research, using a minimum of three peer reviewed articles is not offered.Identification of ways to enhance or optimize health in the selected Healthy People 2020 focus area using evidence-based research, using a minimum of three peer reviewed articles is offered, but it is incomplete, lacking relevant information.Identification of ways to enhance or optimize health in the selected Healthy People 2020 focus area using evidence-based research, using a minimum of three peer reviewed articles is offered at a basic level with limited detail.Identification of ways to enhance or optimize health in the selected Healthy People 2020 focus area using evidence-based research, using a minimum of three peer reviewed articles are offered in detail.Identification of ways to enhance or optimize health in the selected Healthy People 2020 focus area using evidence-based research, using a minimum of three peer reviewed articles are offered in detail, while offering insight and/or reflection.6.0 % Health Disparity Among Different Segments of the Population for the Selected Focus Area The addressing of the health disparity among different segments of the population for the selected focus area is not offered.The addressing of the health disparity among different segments of the population for the selected focus area is offered, but it is incomplete, lacking relevant information.The addressing of the health disparity among different segments of the population for the selected focus area is accurate.The addressing of the health disparity among different segments of the population for the selected focus area is accurate and offered in detail.The addressing of the health disparity among different segments of the population for the selected focus area is accurate and offered in detail, while offering insight and/or reflection.6.0 % Resources for Professionals and Clients No community resources or website resources for professionals and clients are offered.The community resources and website resources for professionals and clients are not appropriate for the selected area of focus.A brief description of two community resources and website resources for professionals and clients is offered for the selected area of focus.A brief description of two community resources and website resources for professionals and clients for the selected area of focus is accurate and offered in detail.A brief description of two community resources and website resources for professionals and clients for the selected area of focus is accurate and offered in detail. Selection of community resources and websites reflect thoughtful consideration to users of resources.7.0 % Health-Related Organization for the Selected Focus Area No health-related organization for the selected focus area is offered.A brief profile of at least one health-related organization for the selected focus area is offered, but it is inappropriate for the selected area of focus or is missing relevant information.A brief profile of one health-related organization for the selected focus area is offered.A brief profile of one health-related organization for the selected focus area is accurate and offered in detail.A brief profile of one health-related organization for the selected focus area is accurate and offered in detail. Selection of community resources and websites reflects thoughtful consideration to users of resources.45.0 %Organization & Effectiveness  40.0 % Presentation of Content The content lacks a clear point of view and logical sequence of information. Includes little persuasive information. Sequencing of ideas is unclear.The content is vague in conveying a point of view and does not create a strong sense of purpose. Includes some persuasive information.The presentation slides are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization and/or in their relationships to each other.The content is written with a logical progression of ideas and supporting information exhibiting a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Includes persuasive information from reliable sources.The content is written clearly and concisely. Ideas universally progress and relate to each other. The project includes motivating questions and advanced organizers. The project gives the audience a clear sense of the main idea.5.0 % Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.) Inappropriate word choice and lack of variety in language use are evident. Writer appears to be unaware of audience. Use of primer prose indicates writer either does not apply figures of speech or uses them inappropriately.Some distracting inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. The writer exhibits some lack of control in using figures of speech appropriately.Language is appropriate to the targeted audience for the most part.The writer is clearly aware of audience, uses a variety of appropriate vocabulary for the targeted audience, and uses figures of speech to communicate clearly.The writer uses a variety of sentence constructions, figures of speech, and word choice in distinctive and creative ways that are appropriate to purpose, discipline, and scope.15.0 %Format  5.0 % Evaluating and Documenting Sources (in-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, references page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment and style) Contains no title slide, no references section, and no correctly cited references within the body of the presentation.Title slide is incomplete or inaccurate. References section includes sources, but many citation errors. Citations are included within the body of the presentation but with many errors.Title slide has minor errors. References section includes sources, but they are not consistently cited correctly. Citations are included within the body of the presentation but with some errors.Title slide is complete. References section includes correctly cited sources with minimal errors. Correct citations are included within the body of the presentation.Title slide is complete. References section includes correctly cited sources. Correct citations are included within the body of the presentation.5.0 % Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) Slide errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning.Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader.Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader.Slides are largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present.Writer is clearly in control of standard, written academic English.5.0 % Layout The layout is cluttered, confusing, and does not use spacing, headings, and subheadings to enhance the readability. The text is extremely difficult to read with long blocks of text, small point size for fonts, and inappropriate contrasting colors. Poor use of headings, subheadings, indentations, or bold formatting is evident.The layout shows some structure, but appears cluttered and busy or distracting with large gaps of white space or a distracting background. Overall readability is difficult due to lengthy paragraphs, too many different fonts, dark or busy background, overuse of bold, or lack of appropriate indentations of text.The layout uses horizontal and vertical white space appropriately. Sometimes the fonts are easy to read, but in a few places the use of fonts, italics, bold, long paragraphs, color, or busy background detracts and does not enhance readability.The layout background and text complement each other and enable the content to be easily read. The fonts are easy to read and point size varies appropriately for headings and text.The layout is visually pleasing and contributes to the overall message with appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and white space. Text is appropriate in length for the target audience and to the point. The background and colors enhance the readability of the text.100 %