20 idea question with their answers a short and easy quiz and a 650 word paper

If you dont have the book then I will provide the link to the book

These are the links to the book below:

http://93.174.95.29/_ads/386806B6F49F948EBE5A3B2514EF4F8A

http://93.174.95.29/_ads/D1CB7D44B2722770B99F808FEFC387A2

I need help to write 10 ideas from the book “Human Story’ chapter 1 and another 10 ideas from the book “Human story’ from chapter 10 and from the book ‘Edible History’ from chapter 5

The idea should be like a question and then explain the answer within few sentences. So altogether it will be like 20 questions with 20 answers in a few sentences.

Also there is a short quiz which I have attched below. you can complete it in the same paper.

You should do the quiz after watching this video https://youtu.be/Yocja_N5s1I

Now talking about the 650 word essay, You need to click this link https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/wilmcoll-ebooks/reader.action?docID=3386436&ppg=8 (Links to an external site.) Log onto the link below: (right-click and open in new tab) and read pages 1-5 of the Introduction to the book Roman Empire: Roots of Imperialism (by Neville Morley).

There are two topics so discuss three factors for these topics for example:

1. Roman history provides an entire view of the life cycle of a civilization

a) you feel they are accurate and why,

b) the United States reflects statements,

c) what elements should we look for as clues that may indicate a decline in a civilization. .

2. Empire brings stability…and hence bestows peace, law, order education and prosperity on the regions it dominates…

a) you feel they are accurate and why,

b) the United States reflects statements,

c) what elements should we look for as clues that may indicate a decline in a civilization.

project executive wk1

Scenario: You are an entrepreneur beginning the process of researching a business development idea. The first step in creating a high-level Information Technology (IT) strategy for your new enterprise/start-up company is to develop an executive summary of your business idea in the context of your goal to incorporate business-driven IT. The executive summary is intended to describe high-level strategic elements of the new business. The executive summary is a working document, which is expected to change over time as new details emerge.

Create an Executive Summary of your new business in a minimum of 700 words that includes the following information regarding your chosen enterprise:

  • A description of the enterprise, the industry sector, product(s), and intended market
  • An overview of the business focus, corporate culture, and ethical framework
  • A summary of how the IT value chain will support enterprise innovation and competitive advantage through decision support

Cite a minimum of 4 peer-reviewed references from the University of Phoenix Library.

Format consistent with APA guidelines.

ethical and legal issues 4

Choose one of the following two assignments to complete this week. Do not do both assignments. Identify your assignment choice in the title of your submission. (Note: This assignment is not a Milestone for the Portfolio Project, so you can choose either option.)


Option #1:
Ethical and Legal Issues with Fake News

Write a 2-page paper (not including the required cover and reference pages) that evaluates a minimum of one fake news story that has been found on a social media platform. Provide the link (or a screen shot) to this news story and pinpoint the ethical and/or legal issues with the story. Then discuss the impact and consequences of the story based on these ethical and/or legal issues.

Your paper must be written and formatted according to the requirements in the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA (Links to an external site.). Support your paper with a minimum of scholarly two sources in addition to the course textbooks. The CSU-Global Library (Links to an external site.) is a good place to find these sources.

Review the rubric for this Critical Thinking assignment in the Module 3 Materials folder for specific grading criteria.

Option #2: Ethical and Legal Issues with a Commercial

Write a 2-page paper (not including the required cover and reference pages) that evaluates a story linked to the “How to spot fake news” story from FactCheck.org. (The FactCheck.org story is at https://www.factcheck.org/2016/11/how-to-spot-fake-news (Links to an external site.)). Pinpoint the ethical and/or legal issues with the linked story that you choose. Identify any ethical or legal implications of the story. Then discuss the impact and consequences of the story based on these ethical and/or legal issues.

Your paper must be written and formatted according to the requirements in the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA (Links to an external site.). Support your paper with a minimum of two scholarly sources in addition to the course textbooks. The CSU-Global Library (Links to an external site.) is a good place to find these sources.

Review the rubric for this Critical Thinking assignment in the Module 3 Materials folder for specific grading criteria.

Rubric

COM340 Mod 3 CT

COM340 Mod 3 CT

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRequirements

10.0 to >8.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Includes all of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

8.0 to >6.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

6.0 to >4.0 pts

Below Expectation

Includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

4.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent

20.0 to >16.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Demonstrates strong or adequate knowledge of the materials; correctly represents knowledge from the readings and sources.

16.0 to >12.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Some significant but not major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.

12.0 to >8.0 pts

Below Expectation

Major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.

8.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials.

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Analysis

30.0 to >24.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Provides a strong critical analysis and interpretation of ethical and legal issues associated with news on social media platforms and potential consequences related to these issues.

24.0 to >18.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Some significant but not major errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation.

18.0 to >12.0 pts

Below Expectation

Major errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation.

12.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Fails to provide critical analysis and interpretation of the information given.

30.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSources / Examples

10.0 to >8.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Sources or examples meet required criteria and are well chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.

8.0 to >6.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Sources or examples meet required criteria but are less‐than adequately chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.

6.0 to >4.0 pts

Below Expectation

Sources or examples meet required criteria and are poorly chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.

4.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Source or example selection and integration of knowledge from the course is clearly deficient.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates college-level proficiency in organization, grammar, and style.

10.0 to >8.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Project is clearly organized, well written, and in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Strong sentence and paragraph structure; few errors in grammar and spelling.

8.0 to >6.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Project is fairly well organized and written, and is in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Reasonably good sentence and paragraph structure; significant number of errors in grammar and spelling.

6.0 to >4.0 pts

Below Expectation

Project is poorly organized; does not follow proper paper format. Inconsistent to inadequate sentence and paragraph development; numerous errors in grammar and spelling.

4.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Project is not organized or well written, and is not in proper paper format. Poor quality work; unacceptable in terms of grammar and spelling.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates proper use of APA style

10.0 to >8.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Project contains proper APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with no more than one significant error.

8.0 to >6.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Few errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with no more than two to three significant errors.

6.0 to >4.0 pts

Below Expectation

Significant errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with four to five significant errors.

4.0 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Numerous errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with more than five significant errors.

10.0 pts

Total Points: 90.0

project data collection wk4

qScenario: Building on your previous papers, You are an entrepreneur in the process of researching a business development idea. As you create a high-level Information Technology (IT) strategy for your new start-up, it is important to consider how digital data will be collected, stored, analyzed, and used. A Project Data Collection Plan will guide the process of identifying enterprise digital data needs, maintenance, and use in the context of your goal to incorporate business driven IT. The Data Collection Plan is intended to describe a high-level process for collecting and maintaining digital data. The Data Collection Plan is a working document, which is expected to change over time as new project details emerge.

Create a high-level Project Data Collection Plan for your project in a minimum of 700 words which includes the following information:

  • A description of the digital data needs of the enterprise organized by department
  • A summary of the type data to be collected and who will use it
  • A description of how the data management system will contribute to organizational collaboration
  • An innovative plan for collecting, storing, analyzing and distributing data that employs emerging technologies such as cloud computing, virtualization, and big data
  • Cite a minimum of 4 peer-reviewed references from the University of Phoenix Library.

    Format consistent with APA guidelines.

    PLEASE HAVE ALL FOUR (4) REFERENCES AND ALL INSTRUCTIONS ARE FOLLOWED. PREVIOUS ASSIGNMENTS HAVE RECEIVED LOWER GRADES DUE ONLY TO AMOUNT IF REFERENCES.

biological science

biological science question diversity of plants………………

biological science question diversity of plants………………

reflections on career counseling

For your final discussion, explain to your peers and your instructor what you will be taking away from the course in career counseling. In your post, answer the following questions:

  • What did you learn that surprised you?
  • What did you find challenging to understand or grasp?
  • What aspects of the course did you enjoy? Which did you not enjoy?
  • What would you like to see added to the course for future sessions?

Since you had an opportunity to focus on your own career goals in this course as you learned to counsel clients or students, how will you keep your own career plan moving forward?

Can use this as a guide:

This class certainly was the most challenging one that I have ever encountered during my educational journey. I honestly felt like I was struggling each week as I attempted to understand what each discussion board/assignment was asking for. I certainly learned quite a bit about multi-cultural needs and ethical concerns regarding career counseling. I suppose I did enjoy writing my CV and cover letter to incorporate a career that I am working hard to achieve. I did not find enjoyment in the struggle of trying to understand each assignment to ensure that I achieve a good grade. For future classes the only advice I could offer is to provide more guidance on what exactly is wanted in each assignment and post. All in all, it certainly was a learning experience and one that I will utilize throughout my career/educational progression.

writing paper 77

For this paper, you will interview someone who works in an occupation or field that interests you. Perhaps you are interested in exploring a field that you plan to go into, or a field/job/work situation of someone you know (a parent, friend, relative). The key will be to integrate into your analysis one or several class concepts. Thus, you will use concepts learned throughout the course and apply them to a real-life working situation, full pages, word count at least 2100.

You may draw from any of the concepts we discuss in class. Some of the more popular choices include:

  • Emotional labor
  • Work in a sex-typed occupation (i.e., a female corrections officer or a male nurse)
  • Work/Family balance, or work as a stay at home mother or father
  • LGBTQ identities at work
  • Tacit skills and coping with boring or routinized work
  • Racial and/or ethnic experiences and/or inequalities in the workplace
  • Service work – issues involved with interacting with customers
  • Blue collar work – women in blue collar jobs; devaluation of blue collar work
  • Labor & union organizing or workplace resistance
  • Immigration experiences

I have attached to this handout a basic description of interviewing strategies. Please refer to that as you construct your interview questions. You may write up specific interview questions to follow or you may want to have an outline of topics to cover. Either way, be sure to include questions that will allow you to explore the topic(s) you have chosen for this project.

Below I have provided a basic, suggested outline for how you should structure your paper.

  • You should begin your paper with an introduction of your topic. Here, you want to be sure to list:
  • Next, you should spend a few paragraphs developing and explaining the core course concepts that you have chosen to explore through interviews with your occupational representative. While in the first paragraph (or two) you only briefly mention these, this next section will be where you more fully develop these ideas. This is done so that when you begin discussing the interview in the next section, the reader has a good sense of why your chosen occupational representative facilitates a better – or more detailed – understanding of course concepts.
  • After you fully develop the relevant concepts, you will begin to discuss your interview. Begin with a description of the interviewee: Who is it? How long has s/he worked in the field? Be thorough! This should be two to three paragraphs.
  • After providing a description, you’ll relate interview information to the course concepts. Be thorough as you link the interview to course concepts. This is the heart of your paper! This should be 3-4 paragraphs.
  • Finally, end with a summary of your project. What did you conclude? Did your respondent’s interview answers coincide with what was found in the literature? Did they diverge? In what way? What new information did you learn about this particular occupation? Did the interview and analysis of course concepts provide insight into this field? These are the types of issues to address in this section. Two to three paragraphs.
  • Be sure to provide a reference page documenting all of the sources you used.
  • Also, be sure to include a copy of your interview questions and the notes you took while conducting the interview. You need only to include these with the copy you turn in in class.
  • The occupation you have chosen as your topic
  • The course concepts in which you have grounded your analysis
  • The sociological relevance of choosing the occupation and concepts (and not just, “because I’m interested in this job.”)

Sociological relevance refers to why/how your project is interesting or relevant to social scientists. It is okay to include statements about why it is important to you, but you need to also provide a statement about your topic’s broader implications. This is an important part of this project: being able to connect your project to course concepts. This should be one to two paragraphs.

For example, if you have chosen to study how a male nurse handles emotional labor in a female sex-typed occupation, you would discuss how your paper provides insight into how men may understand and respond to working in a female-dominated occupation. The goal is to connect your specific topic to the broader importance – to connect the micro with the macro. Ask yourself: what is this a case of?

For example, keeping with the above theme, here you’ll want to discuss what is meant by “emotional labor” (here you could cite the Hochschild reading). What is it? How is it done? Who does it affect? Next, you’ll want to talk a little about gendered occupations, with a focus on men working in traditionally female occupational fields.

You will likely cite from course materials, and you should cite these when appropriate. While you are not required to draw from outside sources, doing so will likely improve your argument. Be sure to properly cite (see attachment on Canvas).

Using the above example, you’d want to list detail such as: What is the sex composition of the male nurse’s setting? Is he, indeed, one of the only few men? What drew him to want to work in this occupation?

For example, did the male nurse say anything about emotional labor? About the care ethic that many associate with nursing? What did he say about working in a female-dominated setting? It is essential that you provide answers to the questions you raised in the front half of your paper.

Sociology 346

Interview Guidelines

The interview with your occupational representative should be around 30-60 minutes. You are not required to audio record or transcribe your interview, but if you choose to do so it may be helpful later on as you attempt to integrate interview material with course concepts. However, you will need to take notes during the interview.

You should notify your respondent that this interview is being conducted as part of a research project for your sociology of work class at the U of O. Inform them that none of the information that they provide will be used for purposes that go beyond fulfilling the requirements for this class (in other words, no information will ever be made public by way of journal or newspaper article). Be sure to ask the respondent if he or she feels comfortable providing identifying information (such as name or organizational affiliation) or if s/he would rather have personal information concealed by means of pseudonyms.

You should begin your interview by asking about background information. How long hast the person been working in the occupation? What is their training? What are their workplace conditions like? For example, if you are interviewing a nurse, how big is the hospital? How many patients does s/he usually attend to on a normal shift?

You also want to be sure to ask questions that directly relate to the topic you have chosen to pursue. For example, if you are interviewing a male nurse, you’d want to ask how many nurses there are total in the hospital and how many of them are males.If you are exploring issues of work and family, be sure to ask about how many hours a week he or she spends at home versus at work. This is intuitive, but be sure to be thorough.

Because of the breadth of topics students have chosen for this class, there will be a great deal of diversity in terms of the content of interview questionnaires. I just want to urge you to be thorough when you are thinking about the types of questions to ask your respondent, especially as they relate to your topic.

It is always useful when conducting in-depth interviews to ask people to elaborate on answers, or to provide you with a specific incident that illustrates the concepts in which you are interested.

  • For example, if you are constructing your analysis around emotional labor, you should ask your respondent to elaborate on a specific time when they felt as if they needed to conceal or fake emotions. What, exactly, happened during that incident? How did they feel? A prompt you might use to elicit this type of information might be something like:
    • Can you provide me with an example of a particular incident when you felt like you had to conceal how much you were worried or upset about a patient’s well-being? How did this make you feel at that moment? Were you able to stop thinking about the patient when you went home that day?

The more detailed information you can elicit to illustrate particular topics, the better.

embryonic stem cell

Embryonic Stem Cell Assignment

Embryonic Stem Cell Assignment (50 pts.)

– Find, read and summarize the Executive Order issued by President George W. Bush regarding embryonic stem cell research in the United States.

– Find, read and summarize the Executive Order issued by President Barrack Obama regarding embryonic stem cell research in the United States.

– Compare and contrast the two Executive Orders. Be sure to discuss why you think that the two Presidents differed so much on their position regarding embryonic stem cell research.

explain and evaluate john dewey s ideas for a child centered education

Paper should be four to five pages. Okay if it only touches the fourth page

Use two different scholarly secondary sources

Work Cited

psyc300 week 6 discussion

Explain two advantages and two disadvantages of conducting a mixed-methods study (rather than two or more different studies), to address a single research question. 

Then discuss why mixed-methods studies may require special consideration of the ethics involved in conducting the study.  

  • Explain, using an example to support your claims.
  • Minimum 300 Words Answer
  • Classmate #1:

Part 1:

There are numerous advantages to using mixed-methods when conducting an experiment. One crucial factor that researchers should consider is what the research is being used for. If both numbers and stories would explain the information from the study, then a mixed-method design should be utilized. In his video, John Creswell (2013) suggested that people can relate to stories but that they crave numerical data. By using a mixed-method design, researchers can utilize both quantitative and qualitative data to present the information, which benefits society’s understanding of the information. According to Wisdom and Creswell (2013), another advantage of using a mixed-method design is that it allows researchers to engage in interactions with others. By this, Wisdom and Creswell (2013) mean that because mixed-method models utilize both quantitative and qualitative data, researchers that are experienced in both types of data retrieval and analysis work together to create a “multidisciplinary team” which creates professional collaboration and interaction.

While there are advantages to conducting mixed-method studies, there are also disadvantages. Due to the nature of needing a substantial amount of both quantitative and qualitative data, the design would require more resources such as finance, time, and human resources (Wisdom & Creswell, 2013). One of the recurring themes from our past six weeks of reading has been the ability to research in a manner that is quick yet efficient in terms of finances and the number of individuals needed to perform the research, therefore making mixed-method designs less favorable. Another disadvantage of conducting mixed-method studies is the need for the researcher to be well-versed in both quantitative research and analysis as well as qualitative research and analysis. This may be difficult for some individuals as they may not be “statistical” thinkers or analyzers, or they may not be “personal” individuals who wish to carry out interactions with research participants. Whatever, the reason, this can be a disadvantage when conducting mixed-method studies.

Part 2:

When conducting either qualitative or quantitative research, there is typically a specific ethical consideration for how the study is being conducted. Ensuring that research participants fully understand the study and the methods being utilized during the research may be problematic as the research requires more than one form of data retrievals such as observations and experiments or surveys and interviews. Another ethical consideration that researchers would need to pay special attention to is confidentiality during data analysis. When analyzing the data, researchers should take extra precautions to not speak about data results with others on the research team. Lastly, the researcher must take special precautions to ensure that they are accurately and honestly including all types of data, regardless if it supports the research question. Withholding certain information leads to an ethical bias on behalf of the researcher.

Part 3:

For example, observational studies that don’t infringe on everyday activities may not require informed consent, however conducting a survey after the observation would. Once there is a need for informed consent, it is ethically responsible for the researcher to divulge all pertinent data retrieval methods being used within the study. Continuing with this example, when reviewing and analyzing surveys, a researcher shouldn’t go on to discuss any information with another researcher that may be analyzing observations as it not only breaches confidentially but also can create analysis bias. Mixed-method designs are a multidisciplinary task typically needing multiple, skilled researchers, which can increase the likelihood of breaking participant confidentiality. Ultimately, upon the conclusion of the research, when integrating all the information, researchers must ethically combine all research gathered to form their conclusion. Leaving out the statistics of the survey because the results didn’t match with the results of the observations, would be unethical to the study, and the participants. Intentionally leaving out information misleads other researchers who may want to expand upon the findings or retest the research methods for validity purposes. Excluding particular research findings is unethical and unfair to participants as they may not be able to pursue appropriate treatment, or they may form a biased belief based upon misleading representations of the data.

References

Creswell, J. [John Creswell] (2013, February 19). FILLER TEXT. Retrieved from Association For Psychological Science: https://www.psychologicalscience.org/observer/mixe…

Sylvia Bereknyei Merrell, J. B. (2018, November 15). Ethical Issues when Conducting Mixed Methods Research. Retrieved from Youtube: 

Minimum 200 words answer to eachFILLER TEXT

FILLER TEXT