An environmental organization would like to film a pro-recycling public service announcement and have brought you on as a consultant to help them better understand the principles of persuasion and how they should be applied in this PSA. As part of your presentation to the organization you will need to educate them on the principles of persuasion (using what has been learned through previous research) that will need to be applied to their PSA. 

By the due date assigned, you should create a PowerPoint presentation.

In the first 4 to 6 slides of your presentation you will need to: Summarize at least two previous research studies on persuasion. How were the principles of persuasion studied? Was the research valid? Why or why not? What was learned through these studies that can be applied to the creation of the above PSA?

In your next 6 to 10 slides you will incorporate all you have learned about the art of persuasion to create your own PSA PowerPoint presentation to present to this organization that they will use to guide the filming of their video.

In this presentation you will need to: Present a creative argument that will persuade the viewers of the need to recycle, which the video will be based on. Use at least two primary principles of persuasion within this presentation. In the final slide outline which two or more principles were used and why they were a good fit for this PSA.

Your total presentation should be a minimum of 10 to 16 slides (not including your title and reference slides). For your project you will need to be creative in the use of your graphics and fonts in addition to discussing and applying the principles of persuasion.  

For this assignment, please use your text book along with additional resources from the online library.

Suggested additional resources: Wood, W. (2000). Attitude change: Persuasion and social influence. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 539-570. Cialdini, R.B. & Goldstein, N.J. (2004). Social influence: Compliance and conformity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 591-621. Schwarz, N. (1998). Warmer and more social: Recent developments in cognitive social psychology. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 239-264. Cialdini, R.B. (2003). Crafting normative messages to protect the environment. Current Directions in Psychological Science. 105-109.

*Homework (Picture 1)

 https://nobaproject.com/modules/research-designs 

*Homework ( Picture 2 )

 Watch this video on “The Law of Attraction”  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qI4oOTW3gpI 

 

 After answering the previous questions, watch this video from the Street Epistemologist as he talks with 2 men, one of whom believes in the Law of Attraction (Colton), and one who does not (Kenneth).   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZXnTA9irjo0&t=66s&frags=pl%2Cwn 

  Week 6 Assignment 1 Week 6 Assignment  Summative Paper

Your client, Julie Brown, is seeking career counseling to help her decide what direction to take in her career. She was recently laid off from a full-time position as a counseling assistant at a local community college. As part of her responsibilities in that job, Julie worked at the front desk of the counseling center. She was the first contact to students, answering basic questions and signing students in to see counselors. She conveyed to you that she absolutely loved her job. Prior to working as a counseling assistant, she worked part time as a test proctor, while earning her Bachelors of Arts degree in Psychology from Fresno State University. Julie visited the career center while in college. Her Keirsey temperament type is Idealist. Her Holland code is Social. Her Myers-Briggs typology indicator is Enterprising, Intuitive, Feeling, and Perceiving (ENFP). Julie has indicated that she wants to consider three career paths before making a final decision. She is open to working full time and attending school at night or working part time while attending school full time. While she prefers personal interactions to virtual communication, she has indicated that online schooling is an option.

Develop an intervention plan including three possible career paths. The plan must include short-term (less than 1 year), intermediate (1-5 years), and long-term career and educational options (5 or more years). The intermediate and long-term options should include options to further her education, specifically identifying colleges/universities, degree program options, length of program, cost, and post-graduate career options. In a 3,500- to 4,200-word (10- to 12-page) case study paper, not including the title and references pages and incorporating your Part I and Part II Case Study assignments, include all of the following components: Introduction Presentation of case-study information Relevant theoretical frameworks Relevant information on her Keirsey temperament type, Holland code, and MBTI Short-term plan Intermediate plan (including education options and career-outlook information for positions she can seek after graduating) Long-term plan (including education options and career-outlook information for positions she can seek after graduating) List of resources for client use (including a brief summary of each resource) Conclusion

Use a minimum of 12 scholarly sources in addition to the course text within the paper.

Point Value: 25 Points
Weekly Learning Outcome Alignment: 1, 2, 3, 4
Course Learning Outcome Alignment: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 Assignment Rubric

Description: Your client, Julie Brown, is seeking career counseling to help her decide what direction to take in her career. She was recently laid off from a full-time position as a counseling assistant at a local community college. As part of her responsibilities in that job, Julie worked at the front desk of the counseling center. She was the first contact to students, answering basic questions and signing students in to see counselors. She conveyed to you that she absolutely loved her job. Prior to working as a counseling assistant, she worked part time as a test proctor, while earning her Bachelors of Arts degree in Psychology from Fresno State University. Julie visited the career center while in college. Her Keirsey temperament type is Idealist. Her Holland code is Social. Her Myers-Briggs typology indicator is Enterprising, Intuitive, Feeling, and Perceiving (ENFP). Julie has indicated that she wants to consider three career paths before making a final decision. She is open to working full time and attending school at night or working part time while attending school full time. While she prefers personal interactions to virtual communication, she has indicated that online schooling is an option. Develop an intervention plan including three possible career paths. The plan must include short-term (less than 1 year), intermediate (1-5 years), and long-term career and educational options (5 or more years). The intermediate and long-term options should include options to further her education, specifically identifying colleges/universities, degree program options, length of program, cost, and post-graduate career options. In a 10- to 12-page case study paper, not including the title and references pages and incorporating your Part I and Part II Case Study assignments, include all of the following components: • Introduction • Presentation of case-study information • Relevant theoretical frameworks • Relevant information on her Keirsey temperament type, Holland code, and MBTI • Short-term plan • Intermediate plan (including education options and career-outlook information for positions she can seek after graduating) • Long-term plan (including education options and career-outlook information for positions she can seek after graduating) • List of resources for client use (including a brief summary of each resource) • Conclusion Use a minimum of 12 scholarly sources in addition to the course text within the paper. Point Value: 25 points Weekly Learning Outcome Alignment: 1, 2, 3, 4 Course Learning Outcome Alignment: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5

Total Possible Score: 25.00
Develops an intervention plan that includes three possible career paths as well as short-term (less than 1 year), intermediate (1-5 years), and long-term career and educational options (5 or more years) for each career path.

Total: 3.75

Distinguished: Clearly and comprehensively develops an intervention plan that includes three possible career paths as well as short-term (less than 1 year), intermediate (1-5 years), and long-term career and educational options (5 or more years) for each career path. All details are present and accurate.

Proficient: Develops an intervention plan that includes three possible career paths as well as short-term (less than 1 year), intermediate (1-5 years), and long-term career and educational options (5 or more years) for each career path. Minor details may be unclear.

Basic: Partially develops an intervention plan that includes three possible career paths as well as short-term (less than 1 year), intermediate (1-5 years), and long-term career and educational options (5 or more years) for each career path. Relevant details may be missing and/or unclear.

Below expectations: Attempts to develop an intervention plan that includes three possible career paths as well as short-term (less than 1 year), intermediate (1-5 years), and long-term career and educational options (5 or more years) for each career path. Minor details may be unclear. Significant details may be missing and unclear.

Non-performance: The development an intervention plan that includes three possible career paths is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions. Develops an intervention plan for the intermediate and long-term options, including options to further her education, specifically identifying colleges/universities, degree program options, length of program, cost, and post-graduate career options.

Total: 3.75

Distinguished: Clearly and comprehensively develops an intervention plan for the intermediate and long-term options, which includes all required options. All details are present and accurate.

Proficient: Develops an intervention plan for the intermediate and long-term options, which includes all required options. Minor details may be unclear.

Basic: Partially develops an intervention plan for the intermediate and long-term options, which includes all required options. Minor details may be unclear. Relevant details may be missing and/or unclear.

Below expectations: Attempts to develop an intervention plan for the intermediate and long-term options, which includes all required options. Minor details may be unclear. Significant details may be missing and unclear.

Non-performance: The development of an intervention plan for the intermediate and long-term options is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions. Final paper is 10-12 pages and incorporates the Part I and Part II Case Study assignments as well as including all of the required components and scholarly sources.

Total: 3.75

Distinguished: Clearly and comprehensively developed a final paper containing all listed required criterion. 

Proficient: Develops a final paper containing all listed required criterion. Minor components may be missing. 

Basic: Partially develops a final paper containing all listed required criterion. Minor components may be missing. Relevant details or components may be missing and/or unclear.

Below expectations: Attempts to develop a final paper containing all listed required criterion. Significant details or components may be missing and/or unclear.

Non-performance: The development a final paper containing all listed required criterion is nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions. Applies evidence of critical thinking in the explanation of issues.

Total: 3.75

Distinguished: Clearly and comprehensively explains the issue to be considered, delivering all relevant information necessary for a full understanding.

Proficient: Clearly explains the issue to be considered, delivering enough relevant information for an adequate understanding.

Basic: Briefly explains the issue to be considered, delivering minimal information for a basic understanding.

Below expectations: Briefly explains the issue to be considered, but may not deliver additional information necessary for a basic understanding.

Non-performance: The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.  Writing and Organization

Total: 5.00

5 – Demonstrates exemplary clarity and organization. The paper contains a well-articulated thesis statement, flawless mechanics, and precise APA formatting.

4 – Demonstrates effective clarity and organization. The paper contains a well-articulated thesis statement, proper mechanics, and correct APA formatting.

3 – Demonstrates adequate clarity and organization. The paper contains a clear thesis statement, adequate mechanics, and mostly correct APA formatting.

2 – Demonstrates some clarity and organization. The paper contains an unclear thesis statement, poor mechanics, and improper APA formatting.

1 – Lacking clarity and organization. The paper lacks a thesis statement, effective mechanics, and proper APA formatting. Research

Total: 5.00

5 – Demonstrates exemplary critical analysis of the research materials.  The student comprehensively uses varied, scholarly, relevant, and current resources to inform analysis, evaluation, problem-solving, and decision-making.

4 – Demonstrates effective critical analysis of the research materials. The student fully uses varied, scholarly, relevant, and current resources to inform analysis, evaluation, problem-solving, and decision-making.

3 – Demonstrates adequate critical analysis of the research materials.  The student adequately uses varied, scholarly, relevant, and current resources to inform analysis, evaluation, problem-solving, and decision-making.

2 – Demonstrates some critical analysis of the research materials.  The student partially uses varied, scholarly, relevant, and current resources to inform analysis, evaluation, problem-solving, and decision-making.

1 – Lacking critical analysis of the research materials. The student fails to use varied, scholarly, relevant, and current resources to inform analysis, evaluation, problem-solving, and decision-making.

Powered by 
 

Team Skills Training Paper

Pretend that you are an internal I-O psychologist assigned to a business or organization. You may choose your current organization or one you wish to work for in the future.

Design a training plan that would encourage effectiveness at the team level. What type of training would you provide, and why? What strategies would you use to avoid groupthink?

Your paper must be a minimum of two and a half pages in length. Make sure that you use headings to organize your paper. Use two outside references to support your argument. 

Details:

Write a 750–word paper discussing codes of practice and ethical issues that must be considered when using psychological assessments. Address the following in your paper: A description of at least three ethical issues including multicultural and diversity issues Implications of each ethical issue Ways to avoid the ethical issues in psychological assessments A discussion of how a clinician assesses behaviors that stem from cultures or subcultures A discussion of how a client’s academic/education, career, personal, and social development impacts assessment choice

Include a discussion of how these ethical issues are addressed in “Section E: Evaluation, Assessment, and Interpretation” from the American Counseling Association Code of Ethics located at: http://www.counseling.org/Resources/aca-code-of-ethics.pdf.

Include at least three scholarly references in addition to the textbook in your paper.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.

This assignment meets the following CACREP Standards:

2.F.7.i. Use of assessments relevant to academic/educational, career, personal, and social development.

2.F.7.m. Ethical and culturally relevant strategies for selecting, administering, and interpreting assessment and test results.

RUBRIC 

10.0 %Ethical, Multicultural, and Diversity IssuesThe paper does not include a description of at least three ethical issues including multicultural and diversity issues. Paper does not demonstrate understanding of the topic.The paper includes a fair description of at least three ethical issues including multicultural and diversity issues. Paper demonstrates poor understanding of the topic.The paper includes a concise description of at least three ethical issues including multicultural and diversity issues. Paper demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic.The paper includes an advanced description of at least three ethical issues including multicultural and diversity issues. Paper demonstrates understanding that extends beyond the surface the topic.The paper includes an insightful description of at least three ethical issues including multicultural and diversity issues. Paper demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic.10.0 %Implications of Each Ethical IssueThe paper does not discuss the ethical implications of each ethical issue. Paper does not demonstrate understanding of the topic.The paper inadequately discusses the ethical implications of each ethical issue. Paper demonstrates poor understanding of the topic.The paper appropriately discusses the ethical implications of each ethical issue. Paper demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic.The paper includes an advanced discussion of the ethical implications of each ethical issue. Paper demonstrates understanding that extends beyond the surface the topic.The paper includes an insightful discussion of the ethical implications of each ethical issue. Paper demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic.15.0 %How to Avoid Ethical Issues in Psychological AssessmentsThe paper does not include a discussion of how ethical issues can be avoided during a psychological assessment. Paper does not demonstrate understanding of the topic.The paper includes a fair discussion of how ethical issues can be avoided during a psychological assessment. Paper demonstrates poor understanding of the topic.The paper includes a concise discussion of how ethical issues can be avoided during a psychological assessment. Paper demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic.The paper includes an advanced discussion of how ethical issues can be avoided during a psychological assessment. Paper demonstrates understanding that extends beyond the surface the topic.The paper includes an insightful discussion of how ethical issues can be avoided during a psychological assessment. Paper demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic.15.0 %Assessing Behaviors that Stem from Cultures or SubculturesThe paper does not include a discussion of how a clinician assesses behaviors that stem from cultures or subcultures. Paper does not demonstrate understanding of the topic.The paper includes a fair discussion of how a clinician assesses behaviors that stem from cultures or subcultures. Paper demonstrates poor understanding of the topic.The paper includes a concise discussion of how a clinician assesses behaviors that stem from cultures or subcultures. Paper demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic.The paper includes an advanced discussion of how a clinician assesses behaviors that stem from cultures or subcultures. Paper demonstrates understanding that extends beyond the surface the topic.The paper includes an insightful discussion of how a clinician assesses behaviors that stem from cultures or subcultures. Paper demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic.15.0 %Impacts of Assessment ChoiceThe paper does not include a discussion of how a client?s academic/education, career, personal, and social development impacts assessment choice. The paper does not demonstrate understanding of the topic.The paper includes a fair discussion of how a client?s academic/education, career, personal, and social development impacts assessment choice. The paper demonstrates poor understanding of the topic.The paper includes a concise discussion of how a client?s academic/education, career, personal, and social development impacts assessment choice. The paper demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic.The paper includes an advanced discussion of how a client?s academic/education, career, personal, and social development impacts assessment choice. The paper demonstrates understanding that extends beyond the surface the topic.The paper includes an insightful discussion of how a client?s academic/education, career, personal, and social development impacts assessment choice. The paper demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic.15.0 %Ethical Issues as Specified in the ACA Code of EthicsThe paper does not include a discussion of how ethical issues are addressed as specified in the ACA Code of Ethics. Paper does not demonstrate understanding of the topic.The paper includes a fair discussion of how ethical issues are addressed as specified in the ACA Code of Ethics. Paper demonstrates poor understanding of the topic.The paper includes a concise discussion of how ethical issues are addressed as specified in the ACA Code of Ethics. Paper demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic.The paper includes an advanced discussion of how ethical issues are addressed as specified in the ACA Code of Ethics. Paper demonstrates understanding that extends beyond the surface the topic.The paper includes an insightful discussion of how ethical issues are addressed as specified in the ACA Code of Ethics. Paper demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic.10.0 %Organization and Effectiveness 3.0 %Thesis Development and PurposePaper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear.Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose.Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.10.0 %Organization and Effectiveness 5.0 %Argument Logic and ConstructionStatement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.10.0 %Organization and Effectiveness 2.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used.Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.10.0 %Format 5.0 %Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.All format elements are correct.10.0 %Format 5.0 %Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)Sources are not documented.Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.100 %Total Weightage