Version:1.0 StartHTML:000000227 EndHTML:000008681 StartFragment:000005220 EndFragment:000008607 StartSelection:000005224 EndSelection:000008603 SourceURL:https://ashford.instructure.com/courses/14074/assignments/276368     Week 2 – Assignment         //<![CDATA[  !function(){   var o,s,v;   if (!(window.Promise && Object.assign && Object.values && [].find && [].includes && (o={},s=Symbol(),v={},o[s]=v,o[s]===v) && (function f(){}).bind().name===’bound f’)) {     s = ‘s’, document.write(‘<‘+s+’cr’+’ipt src=”https://du11hjcvx0uqb.cloudfront.net/dist/ie11-polyfill-9524c2cc43.js”></’+s+’c’+’ript>’);   } }();        //]]>           function _earlyClick(e){       var c = e.target       while (c && c.ownerDocument) {         if (c.getAttribute(‘href’) == ‘#’ || c.getAttribute(‘data-method’)) {           e.preventDefault()           (_earlyClick.clicks = _earlyClick.clicks || []).push(c)           break         }         c = c.parentNode       }     }     document.addEventListener(‘click’, _earlyClick)               

Language Rich Environment All children learn language in a language-rich environment.  In thinking about what you have learned about language so far, how will you design the physical space of your classroom to allow for language opportunities?  You will need to think about the type of communication and interactions that you would like to see take place throughout your classroom.

For example, you might place drawing paper and clipboards in the block area to help foster communication so that children can draw their block creations on paper and share them with other children.  Having a large open space in the block area invites cooperation so children can verbally communicate and work together on large building structures.  You also might have the block shelf labeled for children to be able to see and provide books of shapes and building for children to explore.

For this assignment, you will create a floor plan of your classroom that fosters language development. Your classroom design should have a minimum of three physical areas of the classroom detailed including an explanation of how the design supports language acquisition.  You can use web resources such as Classroom Architect or Gliffy to design your classrooms or you may use Microsoft Word to draw your design using shapes and the textbox feature.  If you choose to use Classroom Architect (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. or Gliffy (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site., you will need to download your design as a PDF file or JPG file and insert the image into a Word document before uploading your final assignment.

For each area (minimum of three) that you define in your classroom floor plan, you must include the following:Explain how the area is set upExplain how specifically the area supports language developmentDescribe the activity or experience that the children can specifically be engaged inExplain what the role of the teacher will be How you will assess the effectiveness of this area on language developmentThis assignment should be completed in a two- to three-page paper (in addition to the title page and reference page) that accompanies your visual floor plan.  Your project should be written in APA format as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center, and include at least two scholarly resources in addition to the course text.  Please remember to provide evidence from the textbook to support your design features.  You must also provide a reference citation in APA format at the bottom of your floor plan.

I need a 500-700 word rebutal for each of these papers below. It does not have to be done in essay form. Just a plain ol rebutal that is due by 11 pm Arizona time. 

Paper # 1  Against marijuana—Marijuana has become increasingly popular, especially among adolescents and college age individuals. The average age for a first time marijuana user is 17 (Price, McQueeny, Shollenbarger, Browning, Wieser, & Lisdahl. 2015). When surveying a sample of adolescents, most perceived marijuana as having more benefits than risks and they endorse it as a no risk substance (Burnett. 2016). However, there are risks and negative effects that are associated with acute and chronic marijuana use. The acute effects include conjunctival injection, increased appetite, dry mouth, tachycardia, and a sense of euphoria. These effects can take place within two hours after use. Chronic effects of marijuana use target the brain. The respiratory system is also a target of effects if marijuana is inhaled through smoking. Long-term use can cause short-term memory impairment, decreased concentration and attention span, and altered problem solving capabilities. Smoking marijuana for a long period of time can cause irritation, swelling, and secretions in the respiratory airways that can, in turn, cause infections, asthma, coughing, and chronic bronchitis. Further, users can also develop chronic obstructive pulmonary disease later in life from prolonged marijuana use (Burnett. 2016). Even though marijuana is endorsed for those with anxiety and depression, about 20% to 30% of users experience increased panic attacks and anxiety after use. Additionally, marijuana can increase psychosis in those with schizophrenia and cause an imbalance of sex hormones, which can lead to reproductive issues (Burnett. 2016). 

As stated, one of the major concerns with marijuana use is its effect on brain development, especially since most users are adolescents or young adults. During adolescence and early adulthood, the brain is still maturing and some areas are not fully developed. Chronic use of marijuana can affect this development and cause deficits in attention, processing speed, executive abilities, and learning and memory (Price, McQueeny, Shollenbarger, et al. 2015). These effects on the development on the brain can be quite alarming since, as shown previously, most adolescents do not perceive any risks from marijuana use. Since the effects on the brain seem to be subtle, most users may not even notice the cognitive deficits occuring until it is too late. 

In one study, it was shown that there may be a social development theory explanation to identify who is most at risk to use marijuana. The results showed that those who experienced child maltreatment, and had lower levels of parental attachment, were more likely to have involvement with peers who use marijuana. This, in turn, resulted in that individual using marijuana as well (Mason, Russo, Chmelka, Herrenkohl, & Herrenkohl. 2017). In this sense, marijuana use could be associated with depression, traumatic past experiences, and even low self-esteem as a result of troubled childhoods. This could make marijuana dependence develop as the user perceives themselves as “fitting in” and “feeling good” during their use, and they are able to forget about the traumatic experiences while they are on the marijuana high. Association with that sense of euphoria could keep the user coming back for more “hits”. On that same note, the three common substances used by adolescents are alcohol, tobacco, and marijuana due to their accessibility. So alcohol and marijuana use can be combined, with sometimes deadly results such as driving under the influence. While only 20% to 30% of traffic crashes are caused by just marijuana use alone, this percentage dramatically increases with the introduction of alcohol in the system (Rogeberg & Elvik. 2016). However, the ability to test for marijuana in the system of a driver is not as easy as testing for alcohol use. With the legalization of marijuana, measures to test levels of THC in the system will need to be developed, as well as laws surrounding driving while under the influence of marijuana. 

Recreational and medical marijuana use is becoming increasingly popular and some states have even legalized marijuana use. However, there are very few guidelines on how to safely use marijuana that are based on scientific evidence (Pearson, Liese, & Dvorak. 2017). Before legalization continues further, it is important that more studies be conducted to create guidelines, educational material, and treatment programs for the use, and possible abuse, of marijuana. Even studies conducted on the medical uses of marijuana are few. It seems that most of the endorsement for marijuana use may be on the limited studies that have been conducted and the increasing perception that there is no risk in using marijuana. More research and education on the effects of marijuana and the pros and cons of use need to be addressed before the legalization of marijuana becomes national. 

References: 

Burnett, A. L. (2016). The adverse effects of cannabis use in adolescents. Journal Of Pain Management, 9(4), 423-425. Retrieved from: https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=psyh&AN=2017-07234-008&site=eds-live&scope=site

Mason, W. A., Russo, M. J., Chmelka, M. B., Herrenkohl, R. C., & Herrenkohl, T. I. (2017). Parent and peer pathways linking childhood experiences of abuse with marijuana use in adolescence and adulthood. Addictive Behaviors, 6670-75. Retrieved from: https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=psyh&AN=2016-61760-013&site=eds-live&scope=site

Pearson, M. R., Liese, B. S., & Dvorak, R. D. (2017). College student marijuana involvement: Perceptions, use, and consequences across 11 college campuses. Addictive Behaviors, 6683-89. Recived from: https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=psyh&AN=2016-61760-015&site=eds-live&scope=site

Price, J. S., McQueeny, T., Shollenbarger, S., Browning, E. L., Wieser, J., & Lisdahl, K. M. (2015). Effects of marijuana use on prefrontal and parietal volumes and cognition in emerging adults. Psychopharmacology, 232(16), 2939-2950. Retrieved from: https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=psyh&AN=2015-19476-001&site=eds-live&scope=site

Rogeberg, O., & Elvik, R. (2016). The effects of cannabis intoxication on motor vehicle collision revisited and revised. Addiction, 111(8), 1348-1359. Retrieved from: https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?

Paper #2- For recreational legalization

The legalization of marijuana, both medically and recreationally, has been a heavily debated topic amongst the medical community, law enforcement, religious groups, and all kinds of people within the United States.  Arguments that can be made for the legalization of marijuana range from improvement on crime rates to having a positive impacts on physical and emotional health.  Even many of the fears that came with legalizing marijuana have been shown to have benefits.  While much more research is needed, so far the legalization of marijuana has had plenty of positive effects and should continue in the progressive direction. 

            One of the biggest crisis in the United States today is the opioid epidemic.  Opioids may be effective for chronic pain, but they often lead to addiction and abuse.  Some people abuse their own prescriptions while others turn to street opioids.  Marijuana is also approved for management of chronic pain.  Having another drug that can replace opioids as a long-term treatment has shown potential for cutting back the rate of opioid abuse (Lake & Kerr, 2016).

            Not only does marijuana relieve pain, but it is known to relieve other ailments ranging from seizures to nausea and vomiting.  On the medical marijuana front it would seem more obvious as to why legalization is beneficial to general health.  On the recreational front it is a little more difficult to understand why people being able to “self-medicate” could have any benefits.  One good example is considering the use and abuse of benzodiazepines.  Many people choose to self-medicate for anxiety and associated symptoms by using marijuana.  Benzodiazepines are very physically and psychologically addicting and have detoxification effects and side effects that are much more significant than marijuana. 

            One unexpected effect of marijuana legalization is a decrease in marijuana consumption in areas with Medical Marijuana Laws (MMLs).  It was originally feared that more access to marijuana would lead to an increase in marijuana consumption.  Instead, areas that have MMLs have shown to have no significant change or a decrease in consumption (Pacula, Powell, Heaton & Sevigny, 2014).  The only way that I can make sense of this is perhaps this has functioned as some kind of economic supply and demand where an increase in supply eventually lead to a decrease in consumption due to the fact the resource is no longer scarce.  An increase in quantity readily available decreases the scarcity of the resource.

            In states where recreational marijuana is not yet legal, for example Pennsylvania, possession and delivery charges are as a schedule one substance just like cocaine or heroin.  When a drug is given this status, the crime surrounding it is just as high level.  Very recently, in a Pennsylvania area close to me, a teenager was murdered over drug dealing having to do with marijuana.  Evidence gathered from western states where marijuana has been legalized shows an actual decrease in rates of violent crimes (Shepard & Blackley, 2016).  Whenever the people selling marijuana are no longer “drug dealers”, the crime aspects of selling and purchasing the substance are decreased or even eliminated.

            One last point in regards to the legal system is the amount of money and resources spent in pursuit of marijuana dealings.  When there are methamphetamines, crack, heroin and other drugs with much higher impact on society in circulation it does not make sense to be in pursuit of marijuana.  We have young adults starting their lives off with first-degree felonies for selling ounces of marijuana because they think nothing of it.  A man who is selling much harder drugs receives the same exact felony.

            From a health standpoint, marijuana’s ability to combat addictions and curb the need for substances like opioids and benzodiazepines far outweighs the false notion that marijuana use leads to other drug use.  The legalization of marijuana has shown to follow a pattern of decreased demand therefore reducing the consumption in areas where it is available.  Resources can now be properly directed toward more important tasks, and less people will receive heavy repercussions associated with such a low-level substance.  Marijuana is finally being recognized for its beneficial properties and treated as a medicine rather than just a substance producing a “high”. 

References

Lake, S., & Kerr, T. (2016). The Challenges of Projecting the Public Health Impacts of Marijuana Legalization in Canada Comment on “Legalizing and Regulating Marijuana in Canada: Review of Potential Economic, Social, and Health Impacts”.International Journal Of Health Policy And Management, 6(5), 285-287. http://dx.doi.org/10.15171/ijhpm.2016.124

Pacula, R., Powell, D., Heaton, P., & Sevigny, E. (2014). Assessing the Effects of Medical Marijuana Laws on Marijuana Use: The Devil is in the Details. Journal Of Policy Analysis And Management, 34(1), 7-31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pam.21804

Shepard, E., & Blackley, P. (2016). Medical Marijuana and Crime. Journal Of Drug Issues, 46(2), 122-134. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022042615623983

In 1,300 words, describe Broca’s and Wernicke’s areas and the effect of damage to these parts of the brain. Additionally discuss how current research is continuing to focus on these areas and how they are delivering new information about the speech areas of the brain.

APA Style  required

  

You see a 30-month-old named Brian for a well-child visit. His mother reports the following development:

· Physical: Walks independently, runs, able to climb stairs alternating feet, makes a tower of nine cubes, and is able to button his pants.

· Social: Follows one-step commands, uses one-word sentences, and has a vocabulary of approximately six words. He is resistant to nighttime and feeding routines, he has marked temper tantrums, and Mom states he does not calm when she tries to comfort him.

 

1.  explanation of any developmental red flags that presented in the case study you selected based on the stages of normal physical, social, and cognitive development for infants, toddlers, and preschoolers. 

2. Explain how you differentiated between normal and abnormal growth and development for this patient and identify which standardized screening tools, clinical guidelines, and management strategies you might use to assess and manage this patient and why.