MUST INCLUDE THESE READINGS:
Groenwald, S. L. (Ed.). (2018). Designing and creating a culture of care for students and faculty: The Chamberlain University College of Nursing Model. Washington, DC: National League for Nursing.
McCormack, B., & McCance, T. (2017). Person-centered practice in nursing and health care. Theory and practice (2nd ed.). Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.
i need assistance
What is the Stark Act and what is its purpose? How is the Stark Act different from the Anti-Kickback Statute? Include an example of a healthcare organization activity which illustrates a possible conflict of interest concern and violation.
Next, analyze and discuss how the ruling would impact a similar healthcare organization or proposed merger/partnership of several healthcare entities.
Provide a thoughtful and complete initial post that is two to three paragraphs (minimum of 400 words) and 3 APA references
No plagiarism
The Law of Healthcare Administration Edition #: 8
Author: J. Stuart Showalter, JD Publisher: Health Administration Press
Assignment Details
Protecting Your Scope of Practice
Protecting the scope of practice for nurses, particularly advanced practice registered nurses, is a major initiative at the American Nurses Association (ANA) 2016. The ANA is working together with our Constituent Member (State) Associations to help remove geographic and practice setting limitations for Advanced Practice Registered Nurses (APRNs). The ANA is working state by state to ensure that state laws affecting APRN’s are both fair and consistent across the country, and that your scope of practice is not unfairly limited.
Discuss how this initiative and how it will impact your future as an APRN and your clinical practice in the state in which you live. Include sources to support your assignment.
To view the Grading Rubric for this Assignment, please visit the Grading Rubrics section of the Course Resources.
Assignment Requirements:
Before finalizing your work, you should: be sure to read the Assignment description carefully (as displayed above); consult the Grading Rubric(under the Course Resources) to make sure you have included everything necessary; and Utilize spelling and grammar check to minimize errors.
Your writingAssignment should: follow the conventions of Standard English(correct grammar, punctuation, etc.); be well ordered,logical, and unified, as well as original and insightful; display superior content, organization, style, andmechanics; and use APA 6th Editionformat as outlined in the APA Progression Ladder.
Assignment 2: Week 2 Practicum Journal: Safe Prescribing
There is probably no greater responsibility that the psychiatric mental health nurse practitioner assumes than the responsibility of prescribing medications. While someone can be harmed by psychotherapy, the level and intensity of the harm generally does not come to the same level of harm that can occur from improper prescribing. The PMHNP must understand his/her responsibility both at a state and federal level when it comes to prescribing medications.
In this Practicum Journal Assignment, you will explore the legalities associated with prescribing controlled substances, as well as what a DEA number is, how to obtain one, and, most importantly, how to prescribe controlled substances in your state.
Students will: Analyze roles of the Drug Enforcement Administration Analyze PMHNP responsibilities when issued a DEA number Analyze DEA number application procedures Analyze state requirements for safe prescribing and prescription monitoring Analyze PMHNP responsibilities for safe prescribing and prescription monitoring Analyze Schedule II-V drug levels
To prepare for this Practicum Journal: Review the Learning Resources.
In 2-3 pages: Describe the role of the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) as it pertains to the PMHNP. Explain your responsibilities when having a DEA number. Explain how you apply for a DEA number. Explain your state’s requirements for a safe prescribing and prescription monitoring program. Explain your responsibility as a PMHNP to follow these requirements. Provide an example of a drug you may prescribe from each of the Schedule II-V drug levels.
LINKS:
https://www.dea.gov/sites/default/files/drug_of_abuse.pdf
https://www.deadiversion.usdoj.gov/pubs/manuals/pract/pract_manual012508.pdf
Personal Philosophy of Teaching, Revised (Part II)As discussed earlier in this course, your personal teaching philosophy is a work in progress. During week 8, you will revisit and revise your teaching philosophy that you submitted during week 1. As part of this assignment, you should evaluate your original philosophy and include a one-page discussion of how your thoughts and ideas about teaching have changed and developed during this course. Guidelines for revising your teaching philosophy and the one-page discussion are below.Assignment GuidelinesRevised Personal Teaching Philosophy (3–5 pages)
Reflect on the teaching principles and practices discussed during the course.What did you learn about teaching that you did not know prior to this course?What stood out as important to you over the past 8 weeks?Consider how you might expand, adapt, or change your original philosophy to your current perspective on teaching (or you may feel compelled to take it in a completely new direction).Your revised teaching philosophy should: Have a clear focus or theme.Be authentic and personal.Relay who you are (or aspire to be) as a teacher.Exhibit genuine enthusiasm for teaching.Clearly express your current teaching values and beliefs, and discuss why you hold those values and beliefs (whether or not they have changed).Describe your current teaching goals (whether or not they have changed).Explain the teaching methods or strategies that you believe are best (whether or not they are different from your original philosophy). Note: make sure the teaching methods you find best are consistent with your goals.Incorporate any new ideas and/or practices that encourage a rich teaching and learning experience.Be 3–5 pages, including the evaluation discussion but excluding title and reference pages; length should suit the context. It should be typed in Times New Roman using 12-point font and double-spaced with 1″ margins.Be well written, using a first person narrative and present tense.Follow APA (6th edition) format.Have no any grammatical, typographical, or spelling errors.Evaluation Discussion of Teaching Philosophy (1 page)
As part of this revised teaching philosophy assignment, you should include a discussion evaluating how your personal thoughts and ideas about teaching have changed during this course.After you have revised your personal teaching philosophy, carefully review your original teaching philosophy that you submitted during week 1 of this course.Compare your original philosophy to your revised teaching philosophy and evaluate the following in a one-page written discussion: Have your teaching goals, methods, or strategies changed, and if so, how and why? Have your teaching priorities and/or perspectives changed or shifted, and if so, how and why?Do you value different learning experiences, and if so, what are they and why?Include any additional information that may highlight how your thoughts and ideas have changed or developed during this course.Include references that you found helpful, insightful, or meaningful in the development of your philosophy of teaching.In addition to the course texts, include at least two outside sources from peer-reviewed journals to support your ideas.Your evaluation discussion should: Be one page excluding title and reference pages, typed in Times New Roman using 12-point font, and double-spaced with 1″ margins.Be well written, using a first person narrative and present tense.Follow APA (6th edition) format.
Instructions :
Use the practice problem and a quantitative, peer-reviewed research article you identified in the Topic 1 assignment to complete this assignment.
In a 1000-1,250 word essay, summarize the study, explain the ways in which the findings might be used in nursing practice, and address ethical considerations associated with the conduct of the study.
Refer to the resource “Research Critique Guidelines” for suggested headings and content for your paper.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.
Overview of experimental research. Center for Innovation in Research and Teaching. Retrieved from, https://cirt.gcu.edu/research/developmentresources/research_ready/experimental/overview on 2nd August 2018
HCS 405 Week 4 Individual Assignment Simulation Review(6 pages word paper)
1) **********1 poster presentation**************************** (cover or reference page not included)
2)¨**********APA norms
3)********** It will be verified by Turnitin and SafeAssign
4) **********References from the last 5 years
_________________________________________________
**Presentation:
Poster presentation
**Community:
Community health center
Organization: American Health Providers Corp.
**Topic:
Importance of sugar control in diabetic patients.
General Requirements
While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide.
Throughout this course you will be developing a formal, evidence-based practice proposal.
The proposal is the plan for an evidence-based practice project designed to address a problem, issue, or concern in the professional work setting. Although several types of evidence can be used to support a proposed solution, a sufficient and compelling base of support from valid research studies is required as the major component of that evidence. Proposals are submitted in a format suitable for obtaining formal approval in the work setting. Proposals will vary in length depending upon the problem or issue addressed; they can be between 3,500 and 5,000 words. The cover sheet, abstract, references page, and appendices are not included in the word limit.
Section headings and letters for each section component are required. Responses are addressed in narrative form in relation to that number. Evaluation of the proposal in all sections is based upon the extent to which the depth of content reflects graduate-level critical-thinking skills.
This project contains seven formal sections: Section A: Organizational Culture and Readiness Assessment Section B: Problem Description Section C: Literature Support Section D: Solution Description Section E: Change Model Section F: Implementation Plan Section G: Evaluation of Process
Each section (A-G) will be submitted as separate assignments so your instructor can provide feedback (refer to applicable modules for further descriptions of each section).
The final paper will consist of the completed project (with revisions to all sections), title page, abstract, reference list, and appendices. Appendices will include a conceptual model for the project, handouts, data and evaluation collection tools, a budget, a timeline, resource lists, and approval forms.
Use the “NUR-699 EBP Implementation Plan Guide” and “NUR-699 Evidence-Based Practice Project Student Example” to assist you. Also refer to “NUR-699 Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Format.”
Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.
NUR699.R.Evidence-BasedPracticeProjectProposalFormat_student.docxNUR699.R.EBPStudentExample_Student.docxNUR699.R.EvidenceBasedPracticeProposalFinalPaperOverview_student.docxNUR699.R.EBPimplementationPlanGuide_student.docx
Academicpapers.net is a pioneering academic writing service with a customer base comprising of thousands of students. We have hundreds of expert writers aboard working in collaboration with a diligent quality assurance team.
Phone: +1 (940) 905 5542