DQ1(WEEK 2)
Provide examples of experimental and nonexperimental research design. Contrast the levels of control applied to each.
Provide examples of experimental and nonexperimental research design. Contrast the levels of control applied to each.
According to the assigned article, “Health Disparity and Structural Violence: How Fear Undermines Health Among Immigrants at Risk for Diabetes,” narratives tell the story of the interconnectedness between fear and health. Thematically, the issue of fearis a dominant feature that affects how an individual approaches day-to-day living and health. Explain the relationship between fear and health identified by the researchers in the article. Do you agree that structural violence perpetuates health disparity?
Review both resources provided below in addition to the assigned readings for this week and reflect on 2 key differences between the UK and US Health systems. What are key opportunities related to advocacy and politics interventions that can be taken by advanced practice nurses to improve our current health system?
Please refer to the resources identified below for details regarding UK Health System.
1. US and UK Health System Comparison- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R4Y0TKiwNgo
2. Peterson-Kaiser Health System Tracker- https://www.healthsystemtracker.org/chart-collection/quality-u-s-healthcare-system-compare-countries/#item-post-op-clots-better-u-s-comparable-countries
3. Summary of the American Health Care Act.pdf
all discussion posts must be minimum 250 words, references must be cited in APA format, and must include minimum of 2 scholarly resources published within the past 5-7 years. Students must respond to 1 different post on a separate day. Response posts must be minimum 100 words each.
1)Breast cancer Paper (5-7 pages)
2)PowerPoint slides ( slides topics to align with the paper outline as listed in the attached criteria and rubric). APA format, double spaced, zero plagiarism, and references.
PLEASE KINDLY READ & FOLLOW ATTACHMENT FOR CRITERIA AND RUBRIC
Respond to this post with a positive response :
Ask a probing question, substantiated with additional background information, evidence or research.
Share an insight from having read your colleagues’ postings, synthesizing the information to provide new perspectives.
Offer and support an alternative perspective using readings from the classroom or from your own research in the Walden Library.
Validate an idea with your own experience and additional research.
Make a suggestion based on additional evidence drawn from readings or after synthesizing multiple postings.
Expand on your colleagues’ postings by providing additional insights or contrasting perspectives based on readings and evidence.
Use references
Main Post
The behavioral risk factor that I selected from the Healthy People 2020 objectives is overweight and obesity among children and adolescents (ages 6 through 19), which has increased significantly over the last three decades (Knickman & Kovner, 2015). Currently, only 36% of Floridians are at healthy weight, and if we stay on our current trend, by 2030, almost 60% will be obese (Florida Health, 2017). Additionally, six out of ten children born today will be obese by the time they graduate from high school (Florida Health, 2017). Five areas in which reform is critically needed in order to prevent obesity are creating safe environments for physical activity, healthy food and beverage choices, message environments, and health care, work and school environments (Knickman & Kovner, 2015). The population-based intervention model describes downstream, midstream and upstream interventions for preventing overweight and obesity among children and adolescents (Knickman & Kovner, 2015).
A downstream health prevention program focuses on changing behaviors at an individual level, rather than preventing risk behaviors (Knickman & Kovner, 2015). Given parents’ influence and control over their children’s diet, physical activity, media use, and sleep, family interventions are a key strategy in the effort to eliminate childhood obesity (Ash, Agaronov, Young, Aftosmes-Tobio & Davison, 2017). An example of a downstream intervention that would be effective is to provide a hand-out for parents and children through the school with helpful tips on reducing screen time, suggestions for healthy food swaps (having an apple instead of chips after school) and suggestions for easy ways to incorporate exercise into your day, such as go for a walk as a family for 20-30 minutes after school each day.
A midstream health prevention program focuses on changing behaviors at a community level, with health promotion programs that are targeted at populations to change or prevent risk factors (Knickman & Kovner, 2015). An example of a midstream intervention that would be effective is to provide school-based sports and physical activity to children each day. Two main individual behavior determinants of health are diet and physical activity (ODPHP, 2018). The school would provide coaches and equipment for children to participate in sports who may not have the ability to otherwise in their home environment.
An upstream health prevention program focuses on developing policies at state and national levels in order to reduce the promotion of unhealthy products and behaviors (Knickman & Kovner, 2015). An example of an effective upstream intervention is the great efforts made in the public-school system to improve the quality of food provided in school lunches, and to eliminate the availability of junk-food to kids. In April 2014, the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) issued new regulations, which took effect in July 2014, banning the sale of all junk-food in schools (Ballaro & Griswold, 2018). The regulations stated that only fruits, vegetables, dairy products, lean-protein foods, and whole-grain items could be sold in cafeterias or vending machines, limiting the maximum calorie count of 200 for snacks and 350 for entrées (Ballaro & Griswold, 2018). Foods containing trans-fats could not be sold, and drinks could contain no more than 35% sugar or fat, and must be limited to water, low- or no-fat milk, and 100% fruit or vegetable juice (Ballaro & Griswold, 2018).
References
Ash, T., Agaronov, A., Young, T., Aftosmes-Tobio, A., & Davison, K. (2017). Family-based childhood obesity prevention interventions: a systematic review and quantitative content analysis. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition & Physical Activity, 14(1), 1-12. doi:10.1186/s12966-017-0571-2
Ballaro, B., & Griswold, A. (2018). Junk food in schools. Salem Press Encyclopedia. Retrieved from https://ezp.waldenulibrary.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ers&AN=89158234&site=eds-live&scope=site
Florida Health. (2017). Healthy weight. Retrieved from http://www.floridahealth.gov/programs-and-services/prevention/healthy-weight/index.html
Knickman, J. R., & Kovner, A. R. (Eds.). (2015). Health care delivery in the united states (11th ed.). New York, NY: Springer Publishing.
Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. (2018). Determinants of health. Retrieved from https://www.healthypeople.gov/2020/about/foundation-health-measures/Determinants-of-Health
See attachments
Why is health promotion/education such an important component to behavioral change? Why do you think behavioral change is so difficult for an individual?
APA format 1 1/2 pages long 3 references 1 from the discussions reference list
due 10/24/19 at 7pm
Incorporating Technology in Community-Based Learning
Unique learning needs exist in all patient populations. However, identifying the need and then designing a technology-based intervention requires a careful analysis of both the population and the planned action. The purpose of this discussion is to describe a community-based population, describe a selected learning need for this population, and explain how I would design a PowerPoint presentation that would address that need.
Community-Based Population
I work in a Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC) that provides primary care to patients across the lifespan. FQHCs receive funding from the Health Resources and Services Administration Health Center Program to provide care in medically underserved communities (Health Resources & Services Administration [HRSA], 2018). Over 28 million people receive care at FQHCs in the United States (HRSA, n.d.). FQHCs use a sliding scale fee, ensuring patients have access to affordable medical care (HRSA, 2018). While FQHCs are intended to serve the medically uninsured, over 77% of the patients receiving care at FQHCs have private insurance, Medicare, Medicaid, or another governmentally funded health insurance (HRSA, 2019). Females represent 57.65% of the patient population, with patients between the ages of 25 and 69 years old presenting most frequently (HRSA, 2019). However, the FQHC patient population possesses unique barriers to care. A significant hurdle for FQHCs to overcome is language, as 23.63% speak a language other than English (HRSA, 2019). Additionally, 68.23% of the patient population is at or below the poverty level (HRSA, 2019). Complicating continuity of care with this patient population is the high number of migratory and seasonal workers and homeless individuals receiving care (HRSA, 2019). All combined, these factors create a patient population with sub-par health literacy.
Learning Need
Indigent patient populations are more likely to have decreased health literacy levels (Whitley, Jones, Hansen, & Vora, 2019). Additionally, patients with diminished health literacy are less likely to return for follow-up care as scheduled (Thompson et al., 2015). Patients who are chronically under- or uninsured do not return for follow-up appointments as medical is not always viewed as a necessity. Failure to follow-up for appointments as scheduled has been shown to increase emergency department visits and worsen patient outcomes (Arora et al., 2015). Therefore, a means to address the FQHC patients’ knowledge deficit of the need to return for follow-up appointments should be identified and implemented.
Addressing the Learning Need
As previously identified, members of FQHC patient populations have decreased health literacy resulting in noncompliance with follow-up appointments and poorer patient outcomes. However, a systematic review of 60 studies identified text messages as an effective intervention to improve patient compliance, thereby increasing patient outcomes (Hirshberg, Downes, & Srinivas, 2018). Text messages provide a low-cost, highly scalable intervention to improve patient follow-up (Arora et al., 2015). Additionally, few members of society do not have access to a mobile phone. Text messages sent seven days, and one day before scheduled appointments are effective intervals for improving patient follow-up (Arora et al., 2015). Potential obstacles for this intervention include patients changing their mobile numbers, having limited data usage, and the inability to know whether the message was received. However, using text messages to reinforce the need for compliance with follow-up care will address the learning deficit for this patient population. Additionally, orientating the office staff and then including them in the implementation of this intervention will address the staff’s learning need. Therefore, a PowerPoint presentation should be designed to orient the staff to this technology-based, evidence-based intervention.
Summary
Learning needs exist in all patient populations. Ongoing advances in technology are providing new methods for addressing these needs. By taking advantage of these technologies, evidence-based interventions can successfully be implemented in the practice setting.
Reference
Arora, S., Burner, E., Terp, S., Nok Lam, C., Nercisian, A., Bhatt, V., & Menchine, M. (2015). Improving attendance at post–emergency department follow‐up via automated text message appointment reminders: A randomized controlled trial. Academic Emergency Medicine, 22(1), 31-37.
Health Resources & Services Administration. (2018, May 8). Federally Qualified Health Centers. Retrieved from https://www.hrsa.gov/opa/eligibility-and-registration/health-centers/fqhc/index.html
Health Resources & Services Administration. (2019). 2018 Health Center Data. Retrieved from https://bphc.hrsa.gov/uds/datacenter.aspx?q=tall&year=2018&state=
Health Resources & Services Administration. (n.d.). HRSA Health Center Program. Retrieved October 1, 2019, from https://bphc.hrsa.gov/sites/default/files/bphc/about/healthcenter factsheet.pdf
Hirshberg, A., Downes, K., & Srinivas, S. (2018). Comparing standard office-based follow-up with text-based remote monitoring in the management of postpartum hypertension: A randomised clinical trial. BMJ Quality & Safety, 27(11), 871-877. doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2018-007837
Thompson, A. C., Thompson, M. O., Young, D. L., Lin, R. C., Sanislo, S. R., Moshfeghi, D. M., & Singh, K. (2015). Barriers to follow-up and strategies to improve adherence to appointments for care of chronic eye diseases. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 56(8), 4324-4331. doi:10.1167/iovs.15-16444
Whitley, M. Y., Jones, E. M. V. W., Hansen, B. K., & Vora, J. (2019). The impact of self-monitoring blood glucose adherence on glycemic goal attainment in an indigent population, with pharmacy assistance. Pharmacy and Therapeutics, 44(9), 554. doi:10.43 21/s1885-642×2006000400006
Review Texas mandated reporter statute. Provide details about this in your post. If faced with a mandated reporter issue, what are the steps in reporting the issue? Create a mandated reporter scenario and post it. Respond to one of your peer’s scenarios using the guidelines for submission/reporting in your state. Be sure to include a reference to your state’s website related to mandated reporting.
TOPIC – Physician-Assisted Suicide
Create a Mind map of above topic.
By the end of the mind mapping process, you will have an entire page full of keywords related to your research topic.
As you dig into each of the main ideas, add sub-topics and supporting evidence:
After your mind map is complete, look over the results and pick out the most interesting terms that you have generated on the page—these terms are your keywords*.
After you have drawn out your mind map, make a list of your main topic, sub-topics, and supporting evidence
Attached below is the writing notes for Assisted-Physician Suicide
Academicpapers.net is a pioneering academic writing service with a customer base comprising of thousands of students. We have hundreds of expert writers aboard working in collaboration with a diligent quality assurance team.

Phone: +1 (940) 905 5542
