A1C9

/in /by

See attachments

Meningococcal PPT OUTLINE ATTACHED

/in /by

  

 15–20 PowerPoint slides  

Use at least 30 point font size consistently throughout 

10 REFERENCES

Choose a PowerPoint design, color scheme, font type, and bullet types · 

Organize the slides based on your headings and subheadings

· Include a title slide (at the beginning) and a reference slide (at the end of the presentation)

 Do not overload the slides with text and data 

Use bullet points to organize your text 

 Keep the text abbreviated and concise 

Choose a different layout for each slide 

Use pictures, graphics, charts, and graphs to illustrate key points

Graphics should make a key concept clearer

Final slides should emphasize key points or leave the audience with a question to think about or answer

Assigment week 5

/in /by

The practice of health care providers at all levels brings you into contact with people from a variety of faiths. This calls for knowledge and acceptance of a diversity of faith expressions.

The purpose of this paper is to complete a comparative ethical analysis of George’s situation and decision from the perspective of two worldviews or religions: Christianity and a second religion of your choosing. For the second faith, choose a faith that is unfamiliar to you. Examples of faiths to choose from include Sikh, Baha’i, Buddhism, Shintoism, etc.

In your comparative analysis, address all of the worldview questions in detail for Christianity and your selected faith. Refer to Chapter 2 of Called to Care for the list of questions. Once you have outlined the worldview of each religion, begin your ethical analysis from each perspective.

In a minimum of 1,500-2,000 words, provide an ethical analysis based upon the different belief systems, reinforcing major themes with insights gained from your research, and answering the following questions based on the research: How would each religion interpret the nature of George’s malady and suffering? Is there a “why” to his disease and suffering? (i.e., is there a reason for why George is ill, beyond the reality of physical malady?) In George’s analysis of his own life, how would each religion think about the value of his life as a person, and value of his life with ALS? What sorts of values and considerations would each religion focus on in deliberating about whether or not George should opt for euthanasia? Given the above, what options would be morally justified under each religion for George and why? Finally, present and defend your own view.

Support your position by referencing at least three academic resources (preferably from the GCU Library) in addition to the course readings, lectures, the Bible, and the textbooks for each religion. Each religion must have a primary source included. A total of six references are required according to the specifications listed above. Incorporate the research into your writing in an appropriate, scholarly manner.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide

Please follow Instructions. Follow RUBRIC Please.

/in /by

In this assignment, students will pull together the change proposal project components they have been working on throughout the course to create a proposal inclusive of sections for each content focus area in the course. At the conclusion of this project, the student will be able to apply evidence-based research steps and processes required as the foundation to address a clinically oriented problem or issue in future practice.

Students will develop a 1,250-1,500 word paper that includes the following information as it applies to the problem, issue, suggestion, initiative, or educational need profiled in the capstone change proposal: Background Problem statement Purpose of the change proposal PICOT Literature search strategy employed Evaluation of the literature Applicable change or nursing theory utilized Proposed implementation plan with outcome measures Identification of potential barriers to plan implementation, and a discussion of how these could be overcome Appendix section, if tables, graphs, surveys, educational materials, etc. are created

Review the feedback from your instructor on the Topic 3 assignment, PICOT Statement Paper, and Topic 6 assignment, Literature Review. Use the feedback to make appropriate revisions to the portfolio components before submitting.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

RUBRIC:

Background

Background section is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.

Problem Statement

Problem statement is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.

Change Proposal Purpose

Purpose of change proposal is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.

PICOT

PICOT is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.

Literature Search Strategy

Literature search strategy is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.

Literature Evaluation

Literature evaluation is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.

Utilization of Change or Nursing Theory (2.2)

Theory utilization content is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.

Proposed Implementation Plan with Outcome Measures (3.2)

Implementation plan is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.

Identification of potential barriers to plan implementation, and a discussion of how these could be overcome (2.3)

Identification of potential barriers to plan implementation with a discussion component is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.

Appendices Inclusive of Practice Immersion Clinical Documentation (1.2)

Appendices are present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.

Evidence of Revision

Evidence of incorporation of research critique feedback and revision is comprehensive and thoroughly developed.

Thesis Development and Purpose

Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.

Argument Logic and Construction

Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

All format elements are correct.

Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

DR.NURS

/in /by

 

1.Describe the approved topic and associated population your group has selected. Discuss how this topic adversely affects the population. How does health disparity affect this population?

2.Explain evidence-based approaches that can optimize health for this population. How do these approaches minimize health disparity among affected populations?

3.Outline a proposal for health education that can be used in a family-centered health promotion to address the issue for the target population. Ensure your proposal is based on evidence-based practice.

week 7 case study

/in /by

Digestive System Case Study

DC comes to the emergency room complaining of acute abdominal pain. She states the pain came after dinner at an all-you-can-eat buffet and has been increasing steadily. The pain is located in her right upper quadrant and is “boring” into her back. She says she feels “gassy” and bloated. What are your differential diagnoses? Include the pathological process involved with your diagnosis. What tests would you order to confirm your diagnosis? What treatments or interventions would be the first line of protocol for your diagnosis?

1 page

provide references

Scratch

/in /by

How to Start Marketing From Scratch?

Order 1039606: Subdural Haematoma

/in /by

  Type of paperAssignment SubjectMedicine and Health Number of pages7 Format of citationHarvard Number of cited resources15 Type of serviceWriting

I require a written document that explains about a subdural haematoma in relation to CT Head scanning. There must be a contribution of diagrams and up to date (within 5 years) references on subdural haematomas. Sub divided into:- An overview Epidemiology clinical presentation Pathology Radiographic features on CT Treatment and Prognosis Differential Diagnosis Types ie acute, subacute, chronic How they are recognised on a ct brain. Harvard Referencing UK English Between 1500-2500 words double spaced Good sources include radiopaedia, radiology assistant, Royal college radiologists and society of radiographers Is there anyone who thinks they can help? I need relevant up to date references Relevant first referenced diagrams. Any questions please ask.

Week two reply (2)

/in /by

Please reply to this discussion with one reference.  

 

The theory-practice gap in nursing is the idea that there is a distinct divide between our current knowledge base and the utilization of that knowledge into the discipline of nursing practice.  The struggle to close this nursing theory-practice gap stems from factors such as a lack or inability to use theory in practice due to a deficiency of belief, knowledge, understanding, or application of theoretical concepts to guide nursing practice (Butts & Rich, 2015).  Venes (2009) describes the term theory as “a statement that best explains all the available evidence on a given topic.  If evidence that contradicts the theory becomes available, the theory must be abandoned, modified, or changed to incorporate it” (p. 2300).  Complicating the learning of theory, theorists often use abstract meanings and multiple interpretations when defining rules and procedures that apply to the clinical setting (Saifan, AbuRuz, & Masa’deh, R., 2015).  Comprehending nursing theories is often an obscure venture when the consensus among modern nursing theorists varies.  Perhaps this disconcertion, coupled with a more demanding need for a basic set of clinical skills, is the reason why traditional nursing practice favors medical knowledge as a guide instead of a theory-first approach.  According to Saifan, AbuRuz, and Masa’deh (2015), “this view was originated from the ability of clinical education to provide students with real-life events that enable them to develop, apply and evaluate their own understanding of concepts being studied” (p. 20).  However, even the most modern clinical educations have contentions as they cannot fully prepare nurses for the inconstant variables and complexity of the real-world practice domain. 

            There is a delicate balance between learning theory and preparation for clinical practice in nursing education.  Too much early focus on theory may leave nurses lacking in essential clinical competencies; a trend that would undoubtedly be detrimental to patient health outcomes. But, failure to address theory in a nurse’s education may not allow the clinical nurse to conceptualize patterns and experiences into research and theory thereby hindering the advancement of nursing practices. 

            I believe that theory is vital to fully recognizing and understanding how and why we pursue the advancement of better nursing practices.  However, it cannot be understated that there is a primary necessity for the development of clinical competence in gaining critical thinking and decision-making skills to achieve the desired patient outcomes for practicing nurses.  These clinical nursing skills are what purposes most nurses with providing health care services.  This actuality cannot overshadow the importance of introducing theory as part of the nursing curriculum.  Planting the early seeds of theory and the associated concepts in nursing education helps to later bridge the theory-practice gap through the merging of experienced clinical knowledge to a growing theoretical understanding in the evolution of the expert nurse. 

References

Butts, J., & Rich, K. (2015). Philosophies and Theories for Advanced Nursing Practice. (2nd ed.). Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.  

Saifan, A., AbuRuz, M., & Masa’deh, R. (2015). Theory practice gaps in nursing education: a qualitative perspective. Journal of Social Sciences / Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 11(1), 20–29. https://doi.org/10.3844/jsssp.2015.20.29

Venes, D. (2009). Taber’s cyclopedic medical dictionary. Ed. 21, illustrated in full color / Philadelphia: F.A. Davis.

Week 7 Advocacy Paper Ethics

/in /by

Choose a patient-care situation in which the RN should intervene and advocate for the patient.  An example of such a situation might be when a patient has not been given complete informed consent. 

Include the following in your paper: Describe the clinical situation concisely and descriptively. It can be an actual situation or a hypothetical one.  Apply the ( Bioethical Decision Making Model   Attached)  to the specific clinical ethical situation that you choose. Address each section of the model in your paper.  Conclude with a discussion of nursing advocacy in the clinical setting and the nurse’s role as a patient advocate.  

Your paper should be 4-5 pages.

You must reference and cite 1-2 scholarly sources other than your text. Include a title page and a reference page to cite your text and adhere to APA formatting.