TJ # 2

/in /by

You have all the details already.

5 pages writing 1

/in /by

On the first day of class you were asked to submit your responses to the following questions:

Question 1: If you were to ask someone else, “Who are you, really?” what kinds of things would you be hoping to hear as an authentic response?

Question 2: What factors should a person consider when making an important ethical decision? What ethical principles are involved?

For this Final Paper (5 pages minimum, double-spaced, 1-inch margins, Times New Roman 12-point font):

Write an essay in which you name and accurately describe at least six ideas from the course that you found significant, three for understanding human identity and three for understanding ethics. Describe each concept, and explain how it helps to highlight important aspects of human identity or ethics, and how it reflects, deepens, or changes your responses to the first-day questions.

Be sure that the introduction of your paper indicates the paper’s topic, and that the body of your paper presents logically constructed arguments to support the points you are making. No research is required or expected on this assignment, but a thoughtful review of course materials and notes is necessary. Use of outside materials in your paper, if any, must use proper citation. (See the Catalog statement on “Plagiarism” in “Class Policies” below.) Due before midnight Wednesday, May 6; submit on Canvas.

Rubric

PL 104 Final Paper Rubric

PL 104 Final Paper Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCompletion on time
10.0 pts

BASIC/PROFICIENT/EXCELLENT

Completed on time.

 6.0 pts

MINIMAL: 6-9

Not sufficiently completed and/or not completed on time.

 0.0 pts

INSUFFICIENT

Not completed or unacceptable work for the respective component

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMechanics: clarity, grammar, attention to Style Sheet as appropriate etc.
10.0 pts

EXCELLENT: 9-10

Written with exceptional clarity and argumentation, persuasive style that describes well the observations about the course materials/ experience.

 8.0 pts

PROFICIENT: 8

Organized, clear, and succinct. No grammar, syntax or spelling errors. Paper shows both distinctions and the relationships among its various parts/sections.

 7.0 pts

BASIC: 7

Follows Style Sheet guidelines. Meets but does not exceed length requirement. Well organized. Generally free of grammar, syntax or spelling errors. Parts of paper are clearly delineated.

 6.0 pts

MINIMAL: 6

Fails to follow Style Sheet guidelines. Disorganized, unclear, substantial grammar, syntax and spelling errors. Parts of paper not clearly delineated.

 0.0 pts

INSUFFICIENT

Not completed or unacceptable work for the respective component

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent: IdentityMinimum two ideas significant for personal identity (30 pts)
30.0 pts

EXCELLENT: 28-30

Discusses three or more concepts regarding identity with analytical and philosophical nuance

 26.0 pts

PROFICIENT: 25-27

Describes accurately three ideas relating to identity, and includes useful examples/key thinkers

 23.0 pts

BASIC: 21-24

Describes somewhat accurately two ideas relating to identity

 19.0 pts

MINIMAL: 18-20

Names but does not accurately describe two ideas relating to identity

 0.0 pts

INSUFFICIENT

Not completed or unacceptable work for the respective component

30.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent: EthicsMinimum two ideas significant for ethics (30 pts)
30.0 pts

EXCELLENT: 28-30

Discusses three or more ethical concepts with analytical and philosophical nuance

 26.0 pts

PROFICIENT: 25-27

Describes accurately three ideas relating to ethics, and includes useful examples/key thinkers

 23.0 pts

BASIC: 21-24

Describes somewhat accurately two ideas relating to ethics

 19.0 pts

MINIMAL: 18-20

Names but does not accurately describe two ideas relating to ethics

 0.0 pts

INSUFFICIENT

Not completed or unacceptable work for the respective component

30.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent: First-Day QuestionsReflection on initial responses to the first-day questions (20 pts)
20.0 pts

EXCELLENT: 19-20

Demonstrates thoughtful analysis and makes nuanced philosophical connections between course content and evaluation of first-day question responses.

 17.0 pts

PROFICIENT: 17-18

Gives clear evidence of having reflected on course material and on the first-day question responses; clear connection between course content and evaluation of first-day question responses.

 15.0 pts

BASIC: 14-16

Gives some evidence of having reflected on course material and on the first-day question responses; slight or only implicit connection between course content and evaluation of first-day question responses

 12.0 pts

MINIMAL: 12-13

Gives little evidence of having reflected on course material and on the first-day question responses; no connection between course content and evaluation of first-day question responses.

 0.0 pts

INSUFFICIENT

Not completed or unacceptable work for the respective component

20.0 pts

Total Points: 100.0

Assignment (3–4 pages) Write your Methodology and Evaluation Plans for a non organization that will help single mothers provide for their family without the help of public assistant. The Methodology includes: • Program Description • Non-Personnel Resource

/in /by

  

Project: Final Project: Writing the Grant Part 2: Methodology and Evaluation Plans

For this Assignment: Review the Final Project Guidelines provided in this      week’s Learning Resources. Carefully review pages 6–15 of the course text as well      as other Learning Resources that focus on methodology and evaluation. You      may also find additional online information from reputable grant-related      organizations such as Foundation Center and individual private funders.  With consideration to feedback that you received from      colleagues and your Instructor to this week’s Discussion, and to your      continued evaluation of the literature and funder guidelines, finalize      your project Methodology and Evaluation Plans.  Remember that this content must demonstrate that it      addresses funder interests as well as the grantee perspective. 

Assignment (3–4 pages)
Write your Methodology and Evaluation Plans for a non organization that will help single mothers provide for their family without the help of public assistant.

The Methodology includes: Program Description Non-Personnel Resources  Facilities, supplies, technology, etc.  Any non-personnel resources that will appear in the       proposal budget should be described  Personnel Resources  Who will be assigned or hired? Management Plan (Work Plan)  Who will be responsible for which activities and what       is the timeline associated with them (first quarter, second quarter,       third quarter, fourth quarter, ongoing)? How the project will be managed? 

The Evaluation Plan includes: Description of the specific criteria that will measure      the success of the project Explanation of data that will be collected  Evaluation instruments that will be used and an      explanation of why these instruments were selected 

Required Readings

Ward, D. (2012). Writing grant proposals that win (4th ed.). Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.

· Chapter 1, “The Conceptual Framework” (pp. 2–19)

Note: Review the content that focuses on methodology (Activities: p. 12) and “Evaluation” (pp. 12–15)

Division of Cooperative Extension of the University of Wisconsin—Extension. (n.d.). Evaluation. Retrieved September 29, 2016, from http://www.uwex.edu/ces/pdande/evaluation/

Grants Northwest. (n.d.-b). Using logic models in grants. Retrieved September 29, 2016, from http://www.grantsnorthwest.com/268/

Grants Northwest. (n.d.-d). Why do evaluation? Retrieved September 29, 2016, from http://www.grantsnorthwest.com/why-do-evaluation/

W. K. Kellogg Foundation. (2004). Logic model development guide. Retrieved from https://www.aacu.org/sites/default/files/LogicModel.pdf

hist301 alexander the great

/in /by

Choose one of the following questions and respond. (275 words)

  1. How did both Plato and Aristotle see the democratic process? Why might they have characterized democracy the way they did? Were they right to do so?
  2. What made Philip II an innovative leader? What changes did he bring to Macedon that made it such a powerful state? In the end, is Phillip a Macedonian or a Greek?
  3. How did Alexander administer his empire once he had conquered it? Was he as great a ruler as he was a conqueror? Why or why not?
  4. We call Alexander “the Great.” Does he deserve such a title? Please be sure to take into account his deeds his policies, and his character when answering the question.

solve the question 15

/in /by

i will `attach the question………………………………………………

help for one

/in /by

help for one 

BUS 661 week 2 Assignment

/in /by

  

Ashford 3: – Week 2 – Assignment

Force-Field Analysis

Describe the concept of force-field analysis and the forces that either drive or restrain the change process. Using the force-field analysis model, discuss a change initiative that you are familiar with, and define the key driving forces and key restraining forces that impact the change.

Your paper should be three to four pages in length (excluding the title and reference pages). Your paper must be formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center, and it must include in-text citations and references for at least two scholarly sources from the Ashford University Library, in addition to the course text

Carefully review the Grading Rubric for the criteria that will be used to evaluate your assignment.

write a research report about pca lda and svm and make a comparison between them

/in /by

Please all information about the research paper is below. Read carefully the instruction. I also add a support materiel. Thank you.

FIN 200 Week 1 CheckPoint Financial Management Goals

/in /by

FIN 200 Week 1 CheckPoint Financial Management Goals

about 3 pages psychological disorders

/in /by

Part one:

Research 2 mental health disorders on the internet OR through literature review.

(MINIMUM OF 1.5 PAGES PER DISORDER)

For EACH disorder find the following:

1.Diagnostic criteria, symptoms, characteristics.

2.Prevalence

3.Gender differences

4.Causes of the disorder

5.Treatment options for the disorder.

Part 2:

FROM THE EXAMPLES SHOWN BELOW, IDENTIFY THE PSYCHOLOGICAL DISORDER THAT EACH INDIVIDUAL IS EXPERIENCING.

NAME THAT PSYCHOLOGICAL DISORDER

TRY TO MATCH A PSYCHOLOGICAL DISORDER WITH EACH SCENARIO.

1.Mark, the class clown, says he is emotionally unstable because he attempted suicide, and at other times he gets uncontrollably elated.

2.Alice, voted most likely to succeed, washes her hands repeatedly and dries them with tissues before she drinks the punch.She thinks that her hands are contaminated and does not want to contaminate the punch.

3.Tom, the prom king comes to the reunion but immediately leaves because the room is decorated in orange and he is afraid of that color.

4.Gary, the star quarterback, says he is in charge of the CIA and that a group of terrorists plan to take him hostage.Jesus visits him nightly, appointed him to the CIA, and told him of the terrorist plot.

5.Fran, the homecoming queen, was making a phone call when she felt her heartbeat suddenly increase; she became dizzy, and she felt like something horrible was about to happen.She tells you that she has felt the same symptoms in several other situations.

6.Samantha, the class nerd, tells you that she is glad that winter is finally over because she becomes severely depressed every winter.

7.Alex periodically suffers from extremely high levels of anxiety, but he cannot pinpoint the source or otherwise say why he is anxious.He is terrified at times, his heart often races, he feels wobbly, and has difficulty concentrating.

8.Karen worries excessively about developing a rare disease.When she meets friends or writes letters to her relatives, she is constantly discussing how she feels and expresses concern that even the most minor irregularities in the functioning of her body are symptoms of underlying diseases.She spends a good deal of time consulting doctors for a second and sometimes third opinion.

9.Jerome, the class valedictorian, sits at the bar and keeps drinking one screwdriver (alcoholic drink) after another.His wife tells you that he does this everyday and has been unable to work for months.

10.Terry complains that he is experiencing recurrent episodes of lightheadedness, rapid breathing, and dizziness, especially as he attempts to leave his house.The symptoms have become so severe that, in fact, he is leaving his house less and less frequently.He now only goes to the grocery store in the company of his sister. Once in the store, he checks immediately for the exits and windows (ways to get out if he has to do so in a hurry).