Legal framework in Islamic marriage
Legal framework in Islamic marriage
Legal framework in Islamic marriage
The purpose of this discussion assignment is to reflect upon your understanding of different historical and philosophical approaches to the self. After completing your readings, write a 2–3-page paper contrasting the avocado/essentialist idea of the self with the artichoke/protean view of the self. Remember to explain specific theories with supporting citations from the textbook and online lectures before contrasting them. (Here is a guide to help you with APA-style citations .)
As you develop your response, you might find some of the following questions to be relevant:What are some of the differences/similarities between the avocado and artichoke views of the self?What do you make of the feminist, existential, and non-Western critiques of the essentialist/avocado self? Are there any other problems with the idea that human beings are fundamentally rational creatures?What is the role of desire in the self? Is it really something separate from reason, as modernism, Christianity, and Islam assert? Can it be controlled? Should it be?
Inferential Statistics Article Critique
Read the article Differential Effects of a Body Image Exposure Session on Smoking Urge Between Physically Active and Sedentary Female Smokers and identify the research questions and/or hypotheses as they are stated. Consider the following questions: What are the variables (sample sizes, population, treatments, etc.)? What are the inferential statistics used in this article? Were the proper steps of hypothesis testing followed?
Write a two- to three-page paper presenting the information listed below. Include a title page and reference page in APA style. Cite any references made to the article within the body of the paper in APA style. Your paper should begin with an introductory paragraph (including a thesis statement) and end with a concluding paragraph summarizing the major points made in the body of the paper and reaffirming the thesis.
Please include the following in the body of your paper: Determine what question(s) the authors are trying to answer by doing this research. Determine the hypothesis being tested and the concepts that were applied in this process. Evaluate the article and critique the statistical analysis employed in the study. Would you have included more and/or different variables? Explain your answer.
Examine the assumptions and limitations of the statistical study. What would you have done differently in this case? Why?
Identify how the authors applied statistical testing to the problem. Interpret the findings of the author(s) using statistical concepts.
Writing the Article Critique
The Assignment: Must be two to three double-spaced pages in length (excluding title and reference pages), and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center. Must include a title page with the following: Title of paper Student’s name Course name and number Instructor’s name Date submitted Must document all sources in APA style, as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center. Must include a separate reference page, formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.
Short Story Analysis Essay
Assignment: As stated in Allyn and Bacon’s Guide to Writing, your goal is to “(p)ose an interpretive question about a short story and respond to it analytically showing your readers where and how the text of the story supports your interpretation.” You may use any short we are not covering in class this term: in other words, do not use “Saboteur” by Ha Jin; do not use “Sweat” by Zora Neale Hurston; do not use “Drown” by Junot Diaz.
“In the introduction to your essay, pose an interesting, problematic, and significant question about the story, one that can be answered several different ways according to the evidence in the text. Look for a question that might lead to differences in opinion among your classmates and that offers readers new insights into the story. Your task in this assignment is not to discover the right way to interpret the text, but to explain your way of reading some aspect of it.
Before you give your thesis, make clear just what question you are putting to the text and why in your introduction. It is this question that engages your readers’ interest and makes them look forward to your analysis.” (In other words, no one should ask, “Who cares?” after reading your introductory paragraph). Then, in the body of your paper, explain your own responses to this question, contrasting your answer with other possible interpretations that (may) have been proposed by your classmates (or others) or that you yourself have considered. You need to provide the citation/integration of at least two secondary sources which provide a critique regarding the story. You should dispute “alternative interpretations” but “concentrate on showing your reader how you arrived at your interpretation and why you think that interpretation is valuable. Use details from the story (and appropriate secondary sources) for support.”
Good literary questions call attention to problematic details of the text, stimulate conversation, and provoke readers to return to the text to reread and rethink. You know you have a good question if (others) disagree about the answer and (can) contribute their own views to the conversation.” Some good questions can arise from the elements of fiction mentioned both in class and in Chapter 5 of the 3rd edition of the Gardner text as well as the questions about text, author, reader, and culture mentioned in Chapter 2 of the same text.
Evaluation Criteria: -Provision of a fairly original interpretive question about a short story with an analytical response to it showing readers where and how the text of the story supports your interpretation through the use of both details from the story itself and secondary sources.
–Demonstration of the reading strategies of rhetorical readers when examining potential
………. Added to cart
Please watch the video HR Basics: Total Rewards on U-tube. In the video you will see the 6 components of the total reward program. Now, except for compensation and benefits, of the 4 remaining components select 2 that you consider most important to you and explain why. Make sure you are specific. Please include references, making sure that all citations have authors name, year and page or paragraph number. Make sure all paragraphs are properly indented and references are properly formatted according to APA style. Please directly address all key points with a good balance of research and your own thoughts. Please be sure to answer this assignment with a minimum of 500 words.
Week 5 – Discussion 2
Your initial discussion thread is due on Day 3 (Thursday) and you have until Day 7 (Monday) to respond to your classmates. Your grade will reflect both the quality of your initial post and the depth of your responses.
The Future of HRM
Today, social media is playing a major role in the selection process. How would the use of such tools as LinkedIn, Twitter, Facebook and others impact your decision in finding the right candidate and why would you select such tool(s)? What would be the impact on HR policies?? Respond to at least two of your classmates’ posts by Day 7.
Carefully review the Discussion Forum Grading Rubric for the criteria that will be used to evaluate this Discussion Thread.
Respond
chemistry lab tips ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
Why would culture shock be useful state of mind for a sociologist
Outline and Annotated Bibliography for Research Paper on Ethnicity
This week you will prepare a two to four page outline and annotated bibliography for your Research Paper. Outline: Develop an outline that identifies the thesis or central argument, along with any main topics and support to be included in your final paper (identified below).Annotated Bibliography: Summarize at least four scholarly sources, in addition to the text, that you plan on using to support your argument.APA Formatting
Focus of the Research Paper
For your Research Paper you will select one aspect of cultural diversity from the following list that you would like to study:
*(For improved memory and increased awareness, remember the mnemonic, GARREACS.)Ethnicity
Once you have chosen one aspect of cultural diversity to study in depth, prepare a Research Paper with the following components:Summarize the pertinent historical, political, social, economic and cultural factors related to your chosen aspect of diversity.Consider and summarize any relevant developmental theory models related to your chosen aspect of diversity.In regard to your chosen aspect of diversity, identify the relevant laws or programs that have either helped or restricted access to care and support.Evaluate how your chosen aspect of diversity, in combination with two other aspects of diversity, can lead to increased needs or issues. For example, if someone is female, African American, and lesbian, will there be additional challenges? Select any combination of three aspects of diversity to discuss.Describe at least two resources currently available in your area for someone needing special services related to your chosen aspect of diversity.Explain how your personal characteristics will either complement or conflict with this diversity issue. Consider your own biases and prejudices or those of your family of origin.Discuss relevant concerns, cautions or insights necessary for you to be a culturally competent human service professional.
It will be helpful if you re-read the Harro article. There are examples of agent/target and messages from family and institutions on pages 17-19.
Academicpapers.net is a pioneering academic writing service with a customer base comprising of thousands of students. We have hundreds of expert writers aboard working in collaboration with a diligent quality assurance team.
Phone: +1 (940) 905 5542