Implementing Performance Measurement

Implementing Performance Measurement

McDavid, Huse, and Hawthorn (2013) pose two discussion questions at the end of Chapter 9.  Select one of the discussion questions and make sure to respond to all of the sub-questions within the particular question you choose. Your post should be 150 to 250 words in length.

LIB 332 week 2 Discussion 3

  

Week 2 – Discussion 3

 

Your initial discussion thread is due on Day 3 (Thursday) and you have until Day 7 (Monday) to respond to your classmates. Your grade will reflect both the quality of your initial post and the depth of your responses. Reference the Discussion Forum Grading Rubric for guidance on how your discussion will be evaluated. 

     

Peer   Assessment Forum 1

 The purpose of this forum is for you to prepare assessment questions based upon the sources that you have used in this course. Formulating these questions will allow you to understand the material at a higher level and prepare you for the Final Research Project.  
 

Develop a minimum of two potential assessment questions over the course topics and learning outcomes in Weeks One and Two. You can choose to develop multiple choice questions, short answer questions, or essay questions.  
 

By Day 7, respond to at least two of your classmates’ posts. First, answer the questions they asked (if responding to an essay question, please phrase your answer as a thesis statement). Next, evaluate their questions, and offer constructive feedback. Did the questions work? Why or why not? Briefly explain your reasoning. If the questions did not work, offer suggestions on how they could have been improved. Please note: Your instructor will be observing this forum but not interacting within it. 

  

Respond 

NTC 406 Week 4 Individual Assignment Applications Protocol Paper

NTC 406 Week 4 Individual Assignment Applications Protocol Paper

write four piece of summaries for psychology articles

Please write summaries for each piece of psychology articles. The length could be more or less than one-page long, with double space. The most important is using your own words.

Here is four pieces of articles.

Military Force and Humanitarian Intervention

In a world of independent autonomous sovereign states, intervention – especially armed military intervention – in the domestic affairs of another state is normally prohibited under international law and the UN Charter. In fact, international law forbids the use of military force, except for purposes of self-defense and/or collective enforcement  (as authorized by the UN Security Council).

While Article 2(4) of the UN Charter (1945) prohibits the use of military force against the ‘political independence’ and ‘territorial integrity’ of autonomous sovereign states, the UN Charter also commits states to protect fundamental human rights. In fact, Article 1(3) of the UN Charter identifies the protection of human rights as one of the principal purposes of the UN system.

 

All of that being established, let’s discuss all of the following:

1. Does the international community have a “right to protect” populations in other countries from genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity?

2. Should the UN Security Council and/or the world’s major powers be more predisposed towards using military force to intervene in a humanitarian crisis and large-scale human rights abuses – such as ethnic cleansing, genocide, mass killings, or other crimes against humanity? Think of the recent situation in Libya, President Obama’s recent decision to send 100 “military advisors” into central Africa, the massacres in Bosnia, the genocide in the African nations of Rwanda and Darfur, as well as the extreme violence in the Democratic Republic of Congo.

3. Can you think of any potential problems, dangers or negative implications that are associated with such military intervention? When considering this question, you may want to examine some of the reasons why developing nations in the “global south” are alarmed by the prospect of such intervention.

Getting Started in Communication Research

art 1:

Write a research question within an area of communication research in which you are interested in answering, i.e., relational conflict, media messages, organizational communication, etc.

Complete the following based on your research question in 50 to 100 words:

Write two one-tailed hypotheses that relate two variables that you have an interest in exploring. For each hypothesis, you should use different variables.  Please see your textbook for additional support. Identify two people you would like to interview to get views relevant to the research question, and explain why you have selected these two people.

Part 2:

Write an additional research question within the area of communication research in which you are interested in answering.

Complete the following based on your research question in 50 to 100 words:

Write two two-tailed hypotheses that relate two variables in which you have an interest in exploring. For each hypothesis, you should use different variables. Identify two people you would interview to get views relevant to the research question, and explain why you have selected these two people.

Part 3:

Respond to the following:

Which of the following methods best describes your approach to communication research in general: empirical, rhetorical, critical, or interpretive? Explain why you would use this method in 100 to 250 words. Provide descriptions of the other three research methods in 50 to 100 words.

Format your assignment according to appropriate course-level APA guidelines.

Submit your assignment to the Assignment Files tab.

SOC 120 week 4 DQ 1

  

Ashford 5: – Week 4 – Discussion 1

 

Your initial discussion thread is due on Day 3 (Thursday) and you have until Day 7 (Monday) to respond to your classmates. Your grade will reflect both the quality of your initial post and the depth of your responses. Reference the Discussion Forum Grading Rubric for guidance on how your discussion will be evaluated.

 

     

Equal   Access to Healthcare

 This discussion presents the opportunity for you to address the inequality of access to healthcare in the United States using moral and ethical reasoning. There is overwhelming evidence that social inequalities affect health outcomes. Many argue that lack of health care access related to poverty is a human rights concern in the United States and that should be subject to public and social justice inquiry. As such, the Affordable Care Act was implemented to promote health equity. Prepare and post a response to the following prompt:
 

From the viewpoint of a social justice activist, present an argument to a Congressional committee as to the ethical and moral reasons for supporting the implementation of the Affordable Care Act. Through research, anticipate an item of debate that will be offered to you by the panel and use at least one ethical theory or perspective from the text to support your evidence of moral imperative.
 

Your initial post should be at least 250 words in length. Support your claims with examples from the required material(s) and/or other scholarly sources, and properly cite any references in APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center. Respond to at least two of your classmates’ posts by Day 7.

MGT 435 Week 1 Intro

  

Week 1 – Post Your Introduction

Your introduction is due on Day 1 (Tuesday). You have until Day 7 (Monday) to respond to your peers.

  

Discussion Participation If you do not see the “Reply” button,      or any responses, you may need to scroll down the page. When you are the first to contribute, you will see only      the “Reply” button. Once you have added your initial post or response,      choose the “Post Reply” button. If any classmates have posted, you will see their      comments, along with the “Reply” button. The “Reply” button – as well as any      responses – will be displayed at the bottom of the page.

  

Post Your   Introduction

Please post a brief bio on the first day of class. Respond to at least three of your classmate’s bios. Use this forum to get acquainted and for ongoing non-content related discussions.

Search entries or author Filter replies by unread 

wrtg112 revising essay

Help with revising attached essay. There are specific changes that are required and are highlighted in the PDF. Other corrections that you think will help tighten the research paper would be great too. Please and thank you