importer Self Assessment Tool

answer question minimum 150 words

The readings for week 5 provide insight into the core mission of the border and transportation critical infrastructures–to provide a secure border while also ensuring the efficient flow of goods and services across the nation’s borders and at ports of entry. Here is the link to the Customs Trade Partnership Against Terrorism. The website provides an avenue for trading partners to become acknowledge experts and trusted partners in compliance. One method of compliance discussed is a methodology for risk assessment known as Importer Self Assessment tool, much like the assessment tool used by the water industry. “Those who import goods can use the Importer Self Assessment in a voluntary approach to trade compliance. The program provides the opportunity for importers who have made a commitment of resources to assume responsibility for monitoring their own compliance in exchange for benefits” The benefits would be what? What is the goal of CTPAT?

Current Trends in Postsecondary Education

Oleson and Hora (2012) stated, “An oft-repeated mantra in higher education is that faculty ‘teach the way they were taught,’ which is largely based on the fact that few faculty receive formal pedagogical training” (p. 3).

In this assignment, you will reflect on your own experience as a student in postsecondary education.

Tasks:

In a minimum of 200 words, respond to the following:Discuss your best and worst experiences during your own postsecondary learning. Provide reasons for your assumptions.Describe the demographics of today’s typical postsecondary learners. Contrast your description with that of the postsecondary learners during your postsecondary career.Characterize the instructional methods and media with which you learned during your postsecondary career and then compare that with the way today’s postsecondary learners prefer to learn. Support your assumptions with rationales.

Support your discussion with scholarly recourses using APA format for citations and references.

Reference:

Oleson, A., & Hora, M. T. (2012). Teaching the way they were taught? Revisiting
           the sources of teaching knowledge and the role of prior experience in
           shaping faculty teaching practices (WCER Working Paper 2012-9).
           Retrieved from University of Wisconsin–Madison, Wisconsin Center for
           Education Research website: http://www.wcer.wisc.edu/publications/
           workingPapers/papers.php

Submission Details:By Friday, July 3, 2015, post your responses to this Discussion Area.Through Sunday, July 5, 2015, respond to at least two of your peers’ posts. While responding, be sure to point out how your college experience is similar to or different from that of your peers.i need one page 

Assignment 2 Grading CriteriaMaximum PointsDiscussed best and worst experiences during personal postsecondary learning; provided reasons.8Described the demographics of today’s typical postsecondary learner; contrasted personal description with that of postsecondary learners during your postsecondary career.4Responded substantively to at least two peers’ posts.4Articulated key points in a clear, logical, and professional manner, with supporting evidence, wherever required, and actively contributed to the discussion by providing points of view with rationales, challenging points of the discussion or drawing relationships between points of the discussion.4Wrote in a clear, concise, and organized manner; demonstrated ethical scholarship in accurate representation and attribution of sources; and displayed accurate spelling, grammar, and punctuation.4Total:24

got it done

500 words and 2 citations total. 250 words and 1 citation per numbered paragraph below:

1)
The Christian Legal Society (CLS) is a student organization at the University of California, Hastings College of Law. This organization filed a lawsuit against the university in the state’s federal district court for violating their First Amendment rights [1]. CLS was not recognized as an official student organization by Hastings College of Law due to them not allowing any student to participate in the organization. It is state law that student organizations have to allow any student to participate, become a member, or seek leadership positions, regardless of their status or beliefs [1]. It was a requirement by CLS that every member confirm that they “believe in: The Bible as the inspired word of God; The Deity of our Lord, Jesus Christ, God’s son; The vicarious death of Jesus Christ for our sins; His bodily resurrection and His personal return; The presence and power of the Holy Spirit in the work of regeneration; [and] Jesus Christ, God’s son, is Lord of my life” [1]. This case was initially dismissed by the district court. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit saw that CLS’s First Amendment rights were not violated. The question for the Supreme Court was did the Ninth Circuit Court make a mistake in its ruling due to the fact that it is directly contrary to the Seventh Circuit’s 2006 decision in Christian Legal Society v. Walker. In a 5-4 split decision the Supreme Court Majority ruled that “a public college does not abridge the First Amendment by declining to acknowledge a student group that refuses to permit all students to join the group, in accordance with state law” [1].

Reference:
[1] Christian Legal Soc. Chapter of Univ. of Cal., Hastings College of Law v. Martinez, 561 U.S. 661 (2010) Justia Law, https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/561/66… (last visited Apr 13, 2020)

2)
Rosenberger v. Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia is a case similar to Christian Legal Society Chapter v. Martinez. In this case Ronald W. Rosenberger, who was a university student, seeked 5,800 dollars from the University for the publishing costs of Wide Awake: A Christian Perspective at the University of Virginia [1]. The funds were coming from a student activity fund. However, the University denied the request on the grounds that it “primarily promotes or manifests a particular belief in or about a deity or an ultimate reality” [1]. According to the University’s guidelines, that is prohibited. The question in this case was “did the University of Virginia violate the First Amendment rights of its Christian magazine staff by denying them the same funding resources that it made available to secular student-run magazines?” [1]. The Supreme Court, in a 5-4 split decision, held that the University was discriminating against Roseberger’s message and imposed a financial burden on his speech [1]. All forms of equality must be promoted even if publication funding is scarce. The University can not support an atheistic perspective and not a religious speech. In the past the University promoted publication and gave no regards to whether it contained religious content or not. Therefore, the University’s publication policy was considered to be neutral by the Court and not in violation of the establishment clause [1]. I do not feel the school handled the controversy correctly by denying the publication due to it having a religious message. I agree with the Court ruling on the matter.

Reference:
[1] Rosenberger v. Rector & Visitors of the University of Virginia LII / Legal Information Institute, https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/515/… (last visited Apr 13, 2020)

Beh 225 Final Interview