Professor Anthony only*

Critical Review No. 3 (Professor’s Choice:  Do the Right Thing, 1989; Directed by Spike Lee or  Smoke Signals, 1998; Directed by Chris Eyre)

 

^ requires watching the film and do a critical review. Below is one of the example to how to write them.

 

 Example 1

Film Title and Director: Gus Van Sant My Own Private Idaho
 Develop a thesis pertaining to the assigned film text and whether or not it, the film, in your view has the power to transform one’s political sensibilities. Your argument should express your point of view regarding the politics of difference, political sensibilities, and political transformation(s) as related to the film. Remember, you’re writing (developing) an analytical essay. Submit your thesis statement in the box below:

   1a.  I found My Own Private Idaho to be a very complex film and with out any background information the average moviegoer would not see this film as one in which would awaken their sensibilities.

 Develop three (3) topic sentences that articulate the major ideas that will comprise the body of your essay. Remember that your topic sentences should clearly state the argument or point to be made in the respective paragraphs. Submit your topic sentences in the box below:

    2a.  (1)The average moviegoer is not aware of the Generation X culture/era, male prostitution, nor the plight of someone with a unique illness like narcolepsy as presented by Mike Waters and therefore has difficulty becoming immersed and empathizing with the character’s. challenges. (2) Throughout the film there is no prominent societal involvement, authority figures or anyone opposing the behavior that the Generation X slackers demonstrated. (3) The “cut-up” directors technique made the film hard to follow contributing to the overall difficulty relating to the characters.

 Identify three (3) scenes from the film that support your thesis statement. Briefly explain:

   3a.  It is difficult to identify three scenes to support my thesis statement because there is not a particular scene in the movie that could do so. It is the technique in which the film was presented and the unique character attributes that leave the average moviegoer confused, lost and walking away saying “what the fuck was that all about?”

 Lastly, fully develop your introductory paragraph. Remember that the best possible thesis will answer some specific question about the text. In this case a question related to the film’s power to transform political sensibilities regarding difference:

   4a.  My Own Private Idaho, a movie about two young male hustlers, is not a film that has the capability to transform one’s sensibilities. Although one might relate to one of the characters, the film does nothing but leave you confused and or lost, wanting more information about the characters in order to make some conclusions about what the producer/movie is trying to make. I found My Own Private Idaho quite confusing. Only after reading about it in Democracy and Difference did it make some sense to me. I found My Own Private Idaho to be a very complex film and with out any background information the average moviegoer would not see the film as one in which awaken’s their sensibilities.
 
Review completed by:  Julie Rodin
  

Example 2

 
Film Title and Director:    Gus Van Sant,  My Own Private Idaho
 Develop a thesis pertaining to the assigned film text and whether or not it, the film, in your view has the power to transform one’s political sensibilities. Your argument should express your point of view regarding the politics of difference, political sensibilities, and political transformation(s) as related to the film. Remember, you’re writing (developing) an analytical essay. Submit your thesis statement in the box below:

   1a.  Gus Van Sant’s movie, My Own Private Idaho, has the power to change a person’s political sensibilities by examining the paradigms that exist between sexuality and personal identity as they relate to the social and moral norms of society.

 Develop three (3) topic sentences that articulate the major ideas that will comprise the body of your essay. Remember that your topic sentences should clearly state the argument or point to be made in the respective paragraphs. Submit your topic sentences in the box below:

   2a.  The character Scott uses his sexuality to create a false identity, though initially intended as a back handed action against his father, in truth, Scott is just as lost as any of the other “street hustlers.” Lacking a cognitive connection between morality and sexuality, Mike falls asleep when faced with “situations of stress,” returning to a time in his life when he feels his personal identity is most stable, his life with his mother; in this way he attempts to understand who he is, through what he has experienced. The accessibility and internal acceptability of this generation of “lost boys” becomes evident during the Café scene, where each tells a horror story of their hustles, laughing, smiling, and shrugging off these encounters as though each was a common experience for those who live hollow lives.

 Identify three (3) scenes from the film that support your thesis statement. Briefly explain:

   3a.  Café 20:50 In the Cafe the “Hustlers” tell horror stories, often overlapping, of their encounters as though they are normal experiences, and though distasteful, perfectly acceptable amongst our society. Betray Bob 1:25:10 Here Scott turns his back on his former mentor, this shows how while Scott appeared to be the character who is the most “together” he is actually the most lost; by casting off a former lifestyle to take up another without respecting the transition that links the two, Scott, has simply taken off one mask and put another on. Here the audience realizes he is the most profound, yet hollow character. Last Pass-out 1:32:05 Mike’s inability to reconcile his past with his present is the reason he is constantly at a cross roads in the middle of nowhere, and it’s in the realization of this that he becomes so upset that he passes out. Here in the final scene he passes out on a road between a brown dying field and a vibrant green one, lost on a road separated from who he was and who he is, this adds to the depth of his shoes being stolen, and a random person picking him up while he slumbers; he doesn’t know where he is going or how he will get there, but it will be an arduous journey.

 Lastly, fully develop your introductory paragraph. Remember that the best possible thesis will answer some specific question about the text. In this case a question related to the film’s power to transform political sensibilities regarding difference:

   4a.  Gus Van Sant’s movie, My Own Private Idaho, has the power to change a person’s political sensibilities by examining the paradigms that exist between sexuality and personal identity as they relate to the social and moral norms of society. With main characters Scott Favor, Keanu Reeves, and Mike Waters, River Phoenix, walk the roads of life amongst a subculture that allows them to exploit their bodies to survive, while attempting to create the foundations of an identity they have yet to understand. With Bob as the veritable “psychedelic teacher” of their subculture, a man who hustles and lies to others, as each hustles and lies to themselves; lost in a world without substance, a melancholy of fading youth.
 
Review completed by:  Mark Lux  

Answer this six questions in paragraph form: 1. Members of NATO agree that using military force to s

Answer this six questions in paragraph form:
1. Members of NATO agree that using military force to stabilize Afghanistan is important to global peace and security. The United States contributes far more to this mission than do other members. Utilizing the information you have absorbed from your textbook and class regarding interactions, answer the following: Why is this the case? What difficulty does the United States have in persuading other members to contribute more? What advantages does the United States secure because it is the largest contributor?

2. The United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has made the case for a global consensus on the science of climate change. The IPCC has also called for significant global action to reduce the human impact on climate change through major policy initiatives and a new global climate change agreement. Member states have, thus far, failed to reach an international agreement on climate. Why is cooperation on climate policy so difficult to achieve? How does the mix of interest, interactions, and institutions make this issue difficult to resolve??

3. A large coalition of countries have agreed that ISIS is a threat to regional and global security. In spite of this, few have committed military forces to directly confront ISIS. Why is this the case? What prevents the actors, who agree on the danger, from acting to stop it? With respect to interests and interactions, why is cooperation difficult to achieve? Could international institutions aid in achieving cooperation? Why/Why not?

4.For this essay you are to utilize the levels of analysis schema to provide explanations for an international event. You will need to provide an explanation applicable to each level of analysis [(systemic, state, individual) or (international, transnational, domestic)] for ONE of the following: the 2011 NATO bombing campaign against Libya, the 2003 US invasion of Iraq, or the 2001 US invasion of Afghanistan.
Examine each explanation and identify which level of analysis is the “best fit” for each. In addition, write a brief explanation of why you believe the chosen level is the best fit. In other words, defend/justify your decision.

5. For this essay you will need to select ONE of the prompts below and answer the question(s) presented:
a. A common criticism of Realism can be summed up with the following statement: “Realism is not
realistic.” Construct an argument that either defends or criticizes this statement.
b. A common criticism of Liberalism is that it is utopian or idealistic. Is liberalism idealistic? Why or
why not?
[In constructing your answer, make sure to demonstrate the basic tenets of the respective theories, as well as properly defending the position(s) you take.]

6. For this essay you will need to select two of the three theories and answer the following:
Given what you know both about the Iraq War or Afghan War as a policy in the war on terror and what you know about the theories selected, how would a proponent of each theory explain this conflict?
[In constructing your answer, make sure to demonstrate the basic tenets of the respective theories, as well as properly defending the position(s) you take.]

SOC 331 week 3 DQ 1

  

Ashford 4: – Week 3 – Discussion 1

Distributive Justice Across the Generations

  

   In Chapter 3 of your textbook, the author discusses how demographic   differences, such as age, influence understandings of distributive justice.   He also reviews how libertarian, utilitarian, and egalitarian theories of   distributive justice enter into conversations across demographic divides.
 

  The soaring cost of health care, the limitations of the economy in paying for   health care, and the growing proportion of the population who are over age   65, have given rise to serious discussion, at times acrimonious, about the   possible need to or the justice of rationing health care to that age group. A   common definition of rationing is withholding some specific medical   treatments for reasons other than a patient’s desire to have the treatment   (e.g., Medicare not paying for certain treatments for very elderly patients).
 

  In your discussion, you must, from the perspective of distributive justice,   summarize the major arguments on both sides (the pros and cons) of the issue   of whether health care should be rationed to the elderly. You must also   characterize these arguments according to whether they are primarily   libertarian, utilitarian, or egalitarian in nature. Finally, you will   evaluate these arguments from your view of distributive justice, explaining   both how your personal life experiences and your own libertarian,   utilitarian, or egalitarian views influence your evaluation.
 

  To help you successfully complete this discussion, review the following   required resources: Callahan, D., & Nuland,        S. B. (2011, June 19). The quagmire: How American medicine is destroying        itself. The New Republic, 242(8), 16-18. Retrieved from the        EBSCOhost database. Rationing by any        other name: Reasons for resisting the push to limit medical care Should we ration        end-of-life care?        [Radio broadcast] Rationing health        care at end of life: Student handout 3

   Your initial post should be at least 300 words in length. Support your claims   with examples from at least two of the required resources for this   discussion, and properly cite any references. Respond to at least two of your   classmates’ posts by Day 7 whose viewpoints are different from yours. Each   peer response must be at least 125 words. Stimulate critical thinking by   contrasting your perspective with your classmate’s and explaining yours, or   by asking your classmate a question and explaining why your question is   significant. 

india analysis

Make an analysis of the country and industry level factors of India.

Examine the political, economic, socio cultural, legal and technological forces at play in India

Describe the challnges faed by firms doing business in India and analyse the cost of doig business in India vs the other emerging markets.

Examine the industry dynamics that affect firms by analyzing Porter’s Five Forcers model

Analyze the competitive environment in India by applying Khnna, Palepu, and Sinha’s Five Contexts Framework

PSY 1O4 week 5 assignment

PSY 1O4 week 5 assignment

  

Jean Piaget, Lawrence Kohlberg, and Erik Erikson Final Essay

I need someone to write 6 pages about the book in the attached file

Read the attached file to write 6 pages to describe what was most helpful and which disagreed and overall effectiveness of the book. Paper should be APA Style. Free plagiarism, please.  

hrm human resource paper

Tough Conversations

Imagine you are the HR manager at a company, and a female employee came to you upset because she felt a male coworker was creating a hostile work environment by repeatedly asking her out on dates even after she said “no.” What would you do?

Write a plan for how would you approach your conversation with each employee, including the most essential topics to cover. As you write your plan, think about what your goals are for this situation and how each conversation will help you achieve those goals.

You will create and submit your assignment by using the ecree link. Just click on the link, and start writing. Your work will be saved automatically. You’ll see some feedback on the right-hand side of the screen, including text and videos to help guide you in the writing process. When you’re ready, you can turn in your assignment by clicking Submit at the bottom of the page.

Click the assignment link to start your assignment in ecree. Please note that ecree works best in Firefox and Chrome.

Write a 5–7 paragraph paper in which you:

  • Write a plan for the conversation you would have with the employee, based on the concepts found in your textbook. What are the most important points you would need to cover in this conversation, and why?
  • Write a plan for the conversation you would have with the employee’s male co-worker, based on the concepts found in your textbook. What are the most important points you would need to cover in this conversation, and why?
  • Format your assignment according to the following formatting requirements:
    • This course requires the use of Strayer Writing Standards. For assistance and information, please refer to the Strayer Writing Standards link in the left-hand menu of your course.
    • Include at least one reference to support your paper.

The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:

  • Create a plan for approaching tough conversations with employees, including a rationale for the most essential topics to cover.

need additional information to the already written report

Assignment #3 – Group Project

This is not more than 20-page submission. In this assignment, students will go through the steps to set up a quantitative research study. The Instructor will divide the class into groups to complete the assignment in week 1. Each group should submit 1 topic selection in week 1, and 1 final report. This report should include qualitative and quantitative sections. Here are the main steps to perform this team project:

Step #1: Topic selection

The instructor will provide a list of topics; the team also should submit the team agreement plan with the selected topic in week 1 for the faculty feedback and approval.

Step #2: Performing Qualitative analysis

2.1. This section of the assignment is aimed at giving students an opportunity to select and analyze at least 5 articles using the ‘Review Manager 5’ tools to analyze the risk of bias for 5 selected articles following these steps:

– The methodological quality and risk of bias evaluation of the selected studies should be conducted independently by two team members, following the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews (Higgins, 2011), a domain-based evaluation for each study should be done across five domains:

– Selection bias,

– Performance bias,

– Detection bias,

– Attrition bias and,

– Reporting bias.

The judgment of studies for potential bias should be indicated by assigning ‘low risk’, ‘high risk, or ‘unclear risk’, for each respective source of bias.

Reference

Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. (n.d.). Retrieved July 12, 2019, from https://training.cochrane.org/handbook

2.2. Report your finding using the Bias-Tables and Bias-Plots.

Table 1: Literature Review Analysis

Authors, Year of Publication

Intervention/

Policy evaluated

Study design/

Time Period

Data/

Study Population

Relevant Findings/

Recommendations

Author1, YYYY

Author2, YYYY

Author3, YYYY

Author4, YYYY

Author5, YYYY

Table 2. Literature Review, Table of Biases

Selection Bias

Performance Bias

Detection Bias

Attrition Bias

Reporting Bias

Authors

Systematic differences between baseline characteristics of the groups that are compared.

Systematic differences between groups in the care that is provided, or in exposure to factors other than the interventions of interest.

Systematic differences between groups in how outcomes are determined.

Systematic differences between groups in withdrawals from a study.

Systematic differences between reported and unreported findings.

Author1, 2019

Y

Y

Y

Y

Y

Author2, 2019

Author3, 2019

Author4, 2019

Author5, 2019

Note:

Y: Low risk

N: High risk

U: Unclear

Step #3: Performing Quantitative data analysis design, this is very similar to the Individual Assignments 1 and 2 (please look at the instruction for more details).

For this section:

3.1. Select one of the class data sets

3.2. Identify relevant variables

3.3. Choose the statistical method you plan to use for your analysis

3.4. Identify statistical software your team will use to run the statistical analysis focusing on EXCEL or RStudio (BONUS points) as the main software (you can use any other software such as SAS, STATA or SPSS, but the master-code will be available only for RStudio)

3.5. Analyze the data, state your conclusions and support them, this section should be included:

3.5.1. Hypothesis or research questions with a short paragraph to discuss the issue.

3.5.2. Research Method for this section first report the table of variables, then define the variables using the example provided in step-by-step instruction.

3.5.3. Report the software and type of analysis you performed in this section included descriptive table and plots

3.5.4. Discuss your findings

3.5.5. Discussion: for this section compare your finding with the LR (literature review) you performed in the first section

3.5.6. Recommendations: suggest a few policy recommendations based on your finding and LR.

Note: Make sure to submit your RStudio codes for your instructor review (for BONUS points).

pos210 gun control and its governmental perspectives

Write a short 2 page paper each on how:

Libertarian (2 page)

Conservatives (2 pages)

Socialist (2 pages)

Modern liberals (2 pages)

Approach Gun Control.

Therefore, you need to have a total of 8 pages.

ECE 315 week 3 DQ 2

  

Ashford 4: – Week 3 – Discussion 2

 

Your initial discussion thread is due on Day 3 (Thursday) and you have until Day 7 (Monday) to respond to your classmates. Your grade will reflect both the quality of your initial post and the depth of your responses. Reference the Discussion Forum Grading Rubric for guidance on how your discussion will be evaluated.

 

     

Video   Observation Discussion

 We have learned in Chapters 5 and 6 that we are able to understand children’s language development stages by observing their processes and interactions. Preview the three videos listed below from Chapter 6 of your text, which are focused on children’s language interactions. The children shown are in various stages of language development.   Choose one of the three videos to conduct an observation and identify the child’s language development stage.   Precursors to Language, retrieved from Section 6.1 of your text.  Babbling,      retrieved from Section 6.2 of your text.  Assessing Cognitive and Language Development, retrieved from the Conclusion section in Chapter 6 of      your text. 

Write your observations of the child, which should support your conclusion of developmental stage. Support your responses with the evidence from the textbook.  
 

The subject line of your discussion should be the title of the video that you watched. Be sure to include a minimum of a 250-word response using your observations and a minimum of one source to support your claims. Your reference(s) should appear at the end of your discussion and be formatted according to APA.  
 

Guided Response:  Review several of your classmates’ posts. Provide a response to at least two of their posts suggesting one activity or strategy that could be used to support the current stage of development they discussed. 

  

Respond