Describe the basic industries of America’s Industrial Revolution and explain what made the men who controlled them so successful. Select one industry to argue your point (such as the petroleum industry). Were the men who dominated this industry “robber barons,” as some suggested, or simply good businessmen?

After the War Between the States Americans focused their energies inward until the 1890s when they turned their attention to acquiring territory overseas. What prompted this dramatic change? What role, if any, did this play in America’s entry into World War I?

Kindly answer the above two questions for me. Thank you so kindly.

Read Case 2: Black Friday and Cyber Monday in Chapter 8 of Integrated Advertising, Promotion, and Marketing Communications. In your post answer the following:

• What comes to mind when advertisers promote their sales on Black Friday or Cyber Monday?
• Have you ever participated in one or both events? Share your experience.
• Do you prefer to go to the store on Black Friday or browse the computer for Cyber Monday deals?
• Are consumers getting the best deal on their purchases on these two days? Why or why not?

For all discussion posts, back up your writing with terms and concepts from class readings. Remember, these same terms and concepts can be used in your Critical Thinking assignments and in the portfolio project, so use the discussion area as a place to practice applying terms and concepts to the situations being addressed.

Your post must be well written and formatted according to the requirements in the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA. Include at least two substantive posts to classmates by Sunday. Respond to two or more of your classmates’ postings in any of the following ways:

• Build on something your classmate said
• Explain why and how you see things differently
• Ask a probing or clarifying question
• Share an insight from having read your classmates’ posts
• Offer and support an opinion
• Validate an idea with your own experience
• Expand on your classmates’ posts
• Ask for evidence that supports the post

How do you use research to gather compelling evidence for your public health issue? Furthermore, how can you use data to prove that your issue is worthy of being a priority? The process of locating and synthesizing scholarly research is a critical skill for all who wish to advocate for public health issues. However, due to the abundance of information that can be found on the Internet, this process is also one that can lead to inaccurate conclusions.

Consider, for example, the controversy that surrounded the reported link between the measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccination and autism spectrum disorder. In 1998, the medical journal The Lancet published a research paper stating that autism could be caused by the MMR vaccination. The authors’ claims received widespread media attention, bolstered by celebrity advocacy. Many parents decided not to vaccinate their children because of the perceived risk; this, in turn, resulted in an increase of illnesses and deaths caused by measles, mumps, and rubella. Years later the paper was deemed fraudulent and retracted by The Lancet. Many scientific and legal groups have indicated that there is no epidemiological or medical evidence that proves a connection between the MMR vaccine and autism.

As a public health leader and advocate, it is essential that you understand how to identify and integrate current, valid research into your policy and advocacy efforts. The use of anecdotal, inaccurate, or unsupported information can negatively impact your public health issue, as well as the individuals, families, and communities for which you are trying to advocate.

In this Assignment, you engage in the process of conducting scholarly, peer-reviewed research.

To prepare for this Assignment, conduct research to locate five scholarly, peer-reviewed articles from the Walden Library that provide evidence for and support your public health issue.

By Day 7 of Week 4, submit the following in a 3- to 4-page paper:

• Title page and Table of Contents.
• Identify the topic and public health issue, which has been approved by your Instructor.
• Provide evidence (two scholarly, peer-reviewed articles) that justifies this as a public health issue.
  • Explain the overall findings of each article.
  • Explain how each article speaks to policy and/or advocacy gaps and further proves the need for intervention.
• Provide evidence (two scholarly, peer-reviewed articles) that speaks to interventions currently being used to address this public health issue.
  • Describe at least one intervention in detail, noting the strengths and challenges of its implementation.
  • Explain the overall impact this intervention has had, using research findings from the scholarly articles to support your thinking.
• Provide evidence (one scholarly, peer-reviewed article) of one alternative intervention that could address this public health issue.
  • Describe the alternative intervention, noting potential strengths and challenges.
• Explain the overall impact this intervention might have and why.
• Complete APA reference page.

Be sure to reference at least five scholarly articles throughout your paper.

Complete each question below between 80-90 words. For questions 3, 4 and 5 please respond back to the following post with your thoughts. (for example “i agree …….”

1.) Can a right triangle be scalene, isosceles, or equilateral? Why or why not? What are the advantages and disadvantages of classifying triangles by sides or angles?

2.)Describe the relationship between a triangle’s centroid and orthocenter. Do they need to be inside the triangle? Provide an example of a real-life application of either the centroid or orthocenter.

3. The centroid of a triangle is the point at which all three medians of the triangle intersect and the orthocenter is the point of the triangle where all three altitudes of a triangle intersect. The centroid does need to be inside the triangle by nature of the definition however the orthocenter can be a vertex of a right triangle. Therefore, it would not necessarily be within the triangle. It’s been a long day and I’m struggling to come up with a real life example of either a centroid or orthocenter. All I can come up with is if three people were standing at an intersection and crossed at the same time, the point in which they would meet in that intersection would be the centroid.

4.)There are many different variations of the right triangle. A right triangle can be a scalene triangle. A scalene triangle angles are different and the lengths of the sides are different. The only way for a right triangle to be an isosceles triangle, a 90 degrees angle and two 45 degree angles. A right triangle cannot be an equilateral because he angles are all equal, the angles are all 60 degrees.

5.)A right triangle can be either scalene or isosceles but not equilateral. An equilateral triangle have three identical angle measures. Since the three angles of any triangle measure 180 degrees, it would be impossible for one of those angles to be 90 degrees. A right triangle can still maintain one 90 degree angle and be scalene (no two sides are equal in length) or isosceles (two sides are congruent).

The advantage to classifying triangles is that it gives you a more accurate picture of the triangle and most times, an important piece of information when trying to figure either length or angle measure.

Global governance indicators by the World Bank provide a data set on the state of governance including corruption across the world, from 1994-2014. To find this dataset, go to the website:

http://info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi/index.asp…

Then go to interactive data access. This page allows you to make reports on data on countries and regions.

1. Following is a table the state of governance across the world for 2011 from a paper of mine. I want you to update the table for 2014.

2. Make a graph of the governance indicators of Eritrea or Ethiopia, indicating the values for 2004, 2009 and 2014. Make some comments on the state of six governanceindicators over time. The program makes automatic graph by itself if you so direct [go to graph view].

3. Make a graph of the six governance indicators for Nigeria, Ethiopia and Eretria for years 2004, 2009 and 2014. Compare their performance over time and amongst themselves. Make some comments.

4. Make a map of the world for corruption. This can be done by using the map view. List the countries that are least corrupt and the countries that are most corrupt.