I page for each hypothetical question with responses please: Attached lecture notes for the week.

Hypothetical One:
The NGO/non-profit/charity you represent is throwing a gala in Washington DC, and your sales team is selling tickets for 10,000 dollars a plate. The President of the United States will be attending and speaking at the event. A cocktail session is scheduled to be held for an hour before the event, where attendees can talk and network with the President and other influential attendees. Would giving a ticket for free to the Russian Ambassador be bribery? What if you were trying to seek a change in legislature in Russia and wanted the Russian Ambassador to hear your entity’s message? Would your answer change if it was the Ambassador from the United Kingdom? How about if the ticket was instead provided to a Saudi Arabian businessman?

Hypothetical 2:

The senior vice president of sales for the energy company you work for comes to you and states that he is going to be flying to the United Arab Emirates to meet with representatives of several emirates and local businesses. He is interested in planning a dinner at a four or five star/diamond restaurant in order to present your company’s business plan for growth and new job opportunities in the UAE. He states that a contingency from Germany, one from China, and one from Japan have already beaten him to the punch and given their presentations, as well as presented gifts to the individuals from the UAE. He would like to do the same and states that he does not think this is a bribe, just a business dinner and that it is culturally acceptable to give gifts to new potential business partners. How do you respond regarding the business dinner? Gifts? What about a pen with your company’s logo on it? What do you say when your VP of sales brings up examples of what the other groups from Germany, China, and Japan have done? Remember, this is the senior VP of sales for your large company, and he does not want to take no for an answer.

For this reading reflection you should find a group of two or three. You each will do an individual Reading Reflection with the same format as before. The addition to this activity is you will then share with your group members your papers collaboratively, assemble a group consensus on which of each group members learning points were most important (you are focusing even more at this point and refining), which Quiz Questions are written the best and establish meaning and then a group essay question with answer.

There is no in class time to converse with your group members so you should learn to develop online SKYPE skills, set up a google docs or a Dropbox share folder or however you design it to work for your group. You will rotate group lead each week so one person isn’t doing all the collation of learning points, QQsand Essay questions every week.

This reading reflection will begin at Chapter 7 (starting Principle 1: Base Management Decisions on Long Term….. in the Toyota Way Book)

The individual RRs will be due here and I will open an assignment link for the group Reflection in another assignment.

The individual RRs are due on Sunday nights at Midnight and the TA (Team Assignment) reflections will be due on Mondays at Midnight. Those are the deadlines, you will have plenty of time during the week to make this happen.

write a minimum 5 pages research paper about police discrimination going by the following order for the peper. APA style.

1- tabel of content. 2- summary. 3- what is the issue. 4- background info. 6- argument for.

7- argument against. 8- contradiction. 9- personal opinion. 10- references

Chapter 7

15. In a particular country, it is known that college seniors report falling in love an

average of 2.20 times during their college years. A sample of five seniors, originally

from that country but who have spent their entire college career in the

United States, were asked how many times they had fallen in love during their

college years. Their numbers were 2, 3, 5, 5, and 2. Using the .05 significance

level, do students like these who go to college in the United States fall in love

more often than those from their country who go to college in their own country?

(a) Use the steps of hypothesis testing. (b) Sketch the distributions involved.

(c) Explain your answer to someone who is familiar with the Z test

(from Chapter 5) but is unfamiliar with the t test for a single sample.

Chapter 8

18. Twenty students randomly assigned to an experimental group receive an

instructional program; 30 in a control group do not. After 6 months, both groups

are tested on their knowledge. The experimental group has a mean of 38 on the

test (with an estimated population standard deviation of 3); the control group

has a mean of 35 (with an estimated population standard deviation of 5). Using

the .05 level, what should the experimenter conclude? (a) Use the steps of

hypothesis testing, (b) sketch the distributions involved, and (c) explain your

answer to someone who is familiar with the t test for a single sample but not

with the t test for independent means.

Chapter 9

18. A psychologist studying artistic preference randomly assigns a group of 45 participants

to one of three conditions in which they view a series of unfamiliar abstract

paintings. The 15 participants in the Famous condition are led to believe that

these are each famous paintings; their mean rating for liking the paintings is 6.5

(S = 3.5). The 15 in the Critically Acclaimed condition are led to believe that

these are paintings that are not famous but are very highly thought of by a group

of professional art critics; their mean rating is 8.5 (S = 4.2 ). The 15 in the Control

condition are given no special information about the paintings; their mean rating

is 3.1 (S = 2.9 ). Does what people are told about paintings make a difference

in how well they are liked? Use the .05 level. (a) Use the steps of hypothesis testing; (c) figure the effect size for the study; (d) explain your answer to part (a) to someone who is familiar with the t test for independent means but is unfamiliar with analysis of variance

Chapter 11

11. Make up a scatter diagram with 10 dots for each of the following situations:

(a) perfect positive linear correlation, (b) large but not perfect positive linear

correlation, (c) small positive linear correlation, (d) large but not perfect negative

linear correlation, (e) no correlation, (f) clear curvilinear correlation.

13. Four young children were monitored closely over a period of several weeks to

measure how much they watched violent television programs and their amount

of violent behavior toward their playmates. The results were as follows:

Child Code number	Weekly Viewing of Violent TV (hours	Number of Violent or Aggressive Acts Toward Playmates
G3368	14	9
R8904	8	6
C9890	6	1
L8722	12	8

(a) Make a scatter diagram of the scores; (b) describe in words the general pattern of correlation, if any; (c) figure the correlation coefficient; (d) figure whether the correlation is statistically significant

(use the .05 significance level, two-tailed); (e) explain the logic of what

you have done, writing as if you are speaking to someone who has never heard

of correlation (but who does understand the mean, deviation scores, and hypothesis

testing); and (f) give three logically possible directions of causality, indicating

for each direction whether it is a reasonable explanation for the correlation

in light of the variables involved (and why).

Can anyone help me?