Need 2 essays please separate and they need to be 500 words or more. Please include detail and examples. Enclosed is the assignment in detail I can send you helpful things once you decide what questions you are choosing.

Book that was being used in class Cahn, Stephen M. 2014. Exploring Ethics: An Introductory Anthology. 4th edition(New York: Oxford University Press)

Requirments for MLA PLEASE!

Choose ONE question from each of the two categories below.

1. Write a dialogue highlighting the differences and similarities between the following views.
   1. Richard Taylor and Susan Wolf on the meaning of life.
   2. Walter Berns and Stephen Nathanson on the morality of the death penalty.
   3. John Rawls on justice vs. a representative of some other theory of justice (e.g., a utilitarian, libertarian, etc.). See http://www.iep.utm.edu/dist-jus/ for a description of some other theories of justice.
2. Write an essay reflecting on one of the following topics:
   1. What reading/video/lesson did you find the most valuable this semester (in terms of helping you to think about an issue differently). In your essay, please describe what your view on the issue was before this lesson, and how you had arrived at this view. Now, carefully describe the idea/argument in question, and explain how it changed your mind.
   2. Choose a recent social, ethical, or political issue about which you are interested, but about which you haven’t yet written an essay. Now, write a mock “letter to the editor” in which you use TWO sources from class to help argue for a solution to this. You should spend at least half the essay carefully explaining the sources (and the rest laying out how they apply to your particular issue).

Bentham, the founder of Utilitarianism calls Rights, Nonsense on Stilts; however, it is often the language we use in society to discuss our most difficult issues. In the Rights Theory, there are both positive and negative rights. The application of these rights are something agreed upon differently based on one’s political perspective. Typically, everyone believes in negative rights, that is the right to be left alone. The positive rights, the right to demand an action from another person is a bit more controversial. Below are images from social and political campaigns which use rights as their justification for their stances. The problem with using Rights as the means for ethical decision making is that one person can say, “I have a right to ….” and the response can be “No you don’t.” From these two contradictory positions, how do we move forward? This may be part of the reason we have been fighting the same battles for decades on many of the same issues. Below are opposing positions on an issue both using Rights Theory as its justification. Pick one or any other similar dispute which uses Rights Theory on both sides and do an analysis. Please note that this is NOT an opinion paper. I am looking for an analysis using the theories. This is a test of your ability to use the material, but it is also a test not to get triggered into a heated opinion piece.

You can give me a concise introduction and conclusion but I also what three paragraphs of analysis. In your conclusion, you can give me an opinion of which theory you think is most useful. This essay should be between 2-3 pages double spaced, 12 pt Times New Roman font, with 1 inch margins.

• Paragraph 1, make a Rights Theory argument for side 1.
• Paragraph 2, make a Rights Theory argument for side 2.
• Paragraph 3, use Utilitarianism or Virtue Ethics to do an analysis of the case.

When you do a Rights Theory analysis, please use the the material from the textbook as your guide and not just my explanation above. Note that there are declarations of rights agreed upon by certain societies and there are also positive and negative rights. Use theTurnitin link below to submit the assignment.

Based on the attached video. and this week’s assigned readings, discuss the importance of physical fitness and a healthy lifestyle as a law enforcement officer. In your discussion, address the following:

• Why is physical fitness important in a police officer’s development and subsequent career?
• What restrictions in training objectives would an overweight police officer encounter in weaponless self-defense and martial arts training within a police academy?
• What regulations are imposed on police agencies with regard to physical fitness requirements after completion of initial training?
• What civil liability, if any, does the agency face if an officer does not maintain a level of physical fitness required of a situation where significant injury or death occurs to a civilian or fellow officer as a direct result of the officer’s level of fitness?

I am seeking 3-4 page paper on the scenario below. This is in reference to Issue and ethics in helping professions. Please follow the instructions, you can get assistance if you follow the federal regulation, 42 CFR Part 2. If you have questions please don’t hesitate to contact me.

For this milestone, you will utilize knowledge learned from your work on the introduction, and you will place yourself in the role of a human services professional (HSP) who is facilitating discharge from a psychiatric hospital. Unique to this case is that the patient is a parolee who was admitted for care in the facility for a crisis involving an accidental overdose of street drugs. The federal regulation, 42 CFR Part 2, will greatly assist you in completing this milestone, as will the module readings and resources provided up to this point.

Consider the following scenario. Stephanie is a human-services policy analyst who works with the state-run psychiatric hospital system. Her job is to facilitate discharges of patients to the community by coordinating with local mental-health centers and providers of care to make sure that the patient has adequate and immediate post-discharge care. Stephanie received a call from a parole officer of a 25-year-old Laotian immigrant patient named Kevin, who was in the hospital. The parole officer indicated that Kevin violated parole by abusing illegal substances prior to the admission to the state hospital. The parole officer asked questions about Kevin’s diagnoses, where he was being discharged to, and the staff involved in his care while hospitalized. You have been asked to determine if Stephanie can legally and ethically answer these questions and provide confidential health information about Kevin to the parole officer.

For this milestone, you will submit a draft of the review of the case, including all critical elements listed below. Using the information reviewed for Milestone One, discuss information that can and cannot be released to a parole officer, particularly information about an individual who has a substance abuse diagnosis along with mental illness, and is being discharged from a psychiatric facility to the community. A state statute from your state of residence can provide information related to parole of individuals previously incarcerated. Provide an example of how an inappropriate release of confidential information can be remediated in order to prevent a lawsuit against the human services professional (HSP) and/or the agency. Some State Departments of Health and Human Services have information related to this issue. Make sure to review both federal and state statutes to gain a more comprehensive viewpoint.

Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed:

II. Review of the Case Based on your analysis of the codes of ethics and legal considerations in human services, create strategies to address questions about the case.

A. What information can be released to the parole officer? What information should not be released to the parole officer? Justify your responses.

B. If information is released that should not be, what are the legal ramifications for the human services policy analyst and her organization? Justify your claims with relevant, scholarly research.

C. What are the ethical issues that would arise for the policy analyst and her organization due to releasing information that should not be released? Recommend appropriate legal strategies to mitigate identified ethical issues.

D. Include other issues that should be considered that are specific to this case scenario and related to compliance with ethics and laws in the human services field. Justify your claims using concrete, relevant examples.

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR DISCUSSIONS: Your contributions should be thoughtful and developed. Answer all parts of the ONE question you choose and use concepts from the course materials. Use a professional style of communication, with attention to grammar, spelling, and typos; cite your sources.

In the second discussion, you will use the interpretative tools that you and your classmates have gathered in the first discussion to address the question you chose. Your initial post for this discussion that answers a question is due by Saturday at 6:00 PM Eastern each week and should be a minimum of 200 words long.