Simple-germination-experiment

see the attached photo.I need number 1, 2, 3 and 4 only

I need you to choose the seeds to use in the experiment. Make this as simple as possible. Just a few paragraphso for each.

Deep-Learning-Seminar-Report

Hello,

I need seminar report for the following paper (2 pages seminar) including 3 or more outside resources and using APA style.

Health-Insurance-Coverage-to-All-US-Citizens-

You just started working as a Health Service Manager at a major hospital. The CEO thinks he has a great idea, and wants your opinion on the following: Expand health insurance coverage to all US citizens (similar to Medicaid) and the federal government will pay the entire cost of coverage.

Write a 4 to 5 page report (double-spaced) on the economic implications of his idea. In discussing the issue, identify at least 3 economic concepts (discussed in Week1 and Week 2’s class content) when discussing whether or not (from an economic perspective) this idea is sustainable in the long-run. Rely on material in the course readings and summary slides to make your case. NOTE: THIS IS NOT A DISCUSSION OF THE CURRENT AFFORDABLE CARE ACT, IT IS A CONCEPTUAL PAPER APPLYING ECONOMIC CONCEPTS LEARNED IN THE FIRST TWO WEEKS OF CLASS.

What-are-the-ethical-issues-Domestic-Surveillance

In this course, you have looked at classical ethical theories of utilitarianism, deontology, and virtue ethics. You have also examined different perspectives on ethical issues introduced by relativism, ethical egoism, and emotivism. For this paper, you will apply these theories and perspectives to a current issue.

Choose an ethical issue to write about. You may choose from the list below or, with approval from the instructor, select a different socially-relevant topic. It is recommended that you choose a topic that you are familiar with or that you have some interest in exploring further. For the purposes of this paper, your topic should pertain to a current area of interest in the news and/or government policy forums.

  • Domestic surveillance

In your paper, you will apply ethical theories and perspectives to the issue that you select. You do not have to use all six, but you should apply at least two ethical theories and at least one ethical perspective in your paper. Make sure that you write primarily on ethical topics and concepts, aiming to be both balanced and intellectually driven in your work. You may share your personal views, but do not rely on opinions (yours or those offered by others) to make your case. Think about the evidence that helps to make your case and use it.

Address the following questions:

  • What are the ethical issues?
  • Where are there breaches of ethical behavior?
  • How could each ethical theory you cite help people think about what constitutes virtuous or ethical behavior?

The paper must be 1500-1800 words in length (excluding title and references pages) and formatted according to APA style. Excluding the textbook, you must use at least five scholarly sources from the Ashford University Library to support your claims. You can also use the Sociology Research Guide located in the Ashford University Library. Cite your sources within the text of your paper and on the reference page.

HCS-335-Discussion-Discuss-the-pros-and-cons-of-euthanasia

Discuss the pros and cons of euthanasia. 100-150 words max

Discuss and provide examples of ordinary versus extraordinary means used in the treatment of the terminally ill.100-150 words max

**Please have each question on the own separate document**

You-have-your-choice-of-topics-to-write-about-in-this-course-This-discussion-looks-forward-to-the-

M1.3 Preliminary Thesis Development (week 2)

You have your choice of topics to write about in this course. This discussion looks forward to the next module’s written assignment, which is to write an approximately 5-page thesis-support essay. No research is required – you can write about any topic that interests you and about which you think you can create a clear thesis and details to develop that thesis.

How to Proceed

Post either the topic and/or the thesis that you’re considering for Module 2’s essay. Include any questions that you might have about these as a writer. Label your post [my name’s] working thesis. Others will respond to your topic/working, so that there is one discussion thread per student.

Then respond to at least 2-3 other working thesis posts, offering your ideas about turning a topic into a thesis, or about developing a working thesis.

Make-up-10-questions-from-chapter-1-and-10-questions-from-chapter-2-total-of-20-questions-fill-in-the-blank-

  • Make up 10 questions from chapter 1 and 10queationamfrom chapter 2 total of 20 questions fill in the blank, multiple choice potential test questions for chapter 1.
  • Include the answers! Neatness counts!

how-to-write-an-email

everything is in the file

business-foundations

could you check the answers of these question and solve it from the PowerPoint

Research-hostile-work-environments-and-how-they-affect-employees-

Details:

In 1,000-1,250 words, describe a hostile work environments, by doing the following:

  1. Research hostile work environments and how they affect employees.
  2. Describe what makes up a hostile work environment.
  3. Explain the various ways employees are affected by hostile work environments.
  4. Provide at least three things that HR professionals can do to avoid having hostile work environments.

Use two to four scholarly sources to support your explanations.

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.

Top of Form

Please Note: Assignment will not be submitted to the faculty member until the “Submit” button under “Final Submission” is clicked.

New Attempt

Bottom of Form

Title

Attached Documents

Turnitin Report

Similarity Index

Final Submission

Click ‘New Attempt’ to start assignment or attach documents

Top of Form

Apply Rubrics

Hostile Work Environments

1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%

2
Less than Satisfactory
74.00%

3
Satisfactory
79.00%

4
Good
87.00%

5
Excellent
100.00%

70.0 %Content

15.0 % A research of hostile work environments and how they affect employees is completed.

No research is completed.

Minimal research is completed on hostile work environments and how they affect employees. Ideas are disorganized and often hard to follow.

A research of hostile work environments and how they affect employees is completed. Ideas are organized and move logically.

An in-depth research of hostile work environments and how they affect employees is thoroughly completed. Writing is detailed and thoughtful. Ideas are organized and move logically.

Research of hostile work environments and how they affect employees is complete and supported by appropriate documentation of reliable citations. Writing is detailed, thoughtful, and thorough. Ideas are organized and move logically.

20.0 % A description of what makes up a hostile work environment is provided.

No description is provided.

A brief description of what makes up a hostile work environment is provided.

A description of what makes up a hostile work environment is provided.

A detailed description of what makes up a hostile work environment is provided along with examples of this type of environment.

A detailed, in-depth description of what makes up a hostile work environment is provided, along with specific examples of behaviors that create that type of environment.

20.0 % An explanation of the various ways employees are affected by hostile work environments is provided.

No explanation is provided.

A limited explanation of the various ways employees are affected by hostile work environments is provided.

An explanation of the various ways employees are affected by hostile work environments is provided.

A logical, well-thought-out explanation of the various ways employees are affected by hostile work environments is provided.

A logical, well-thought-out explanation of the various ways employees are affected by hostile work environments is provided, using specific examples from personal experience.

15.0 % At least three things that HR professionals can do to avoid having hostile work environments are provided.

No description of what HR professionals can do to avoid having a hostile work environment is provided.

Less than three things that HR professionals can do to avoid having hostile work environments are provided.

Three or more things that HR professionals can do to avoid having hostile work environments are provided.

Three or more things that HR professionals can do to avoid having hostile work environments are provided and explained using personal experience to reinforce explanation.

Three or more things that HR professionals can do to avoid having hostile work environments are provided and explained, using personal experience to reinforce explanation. Additionally examples of real-world HR policies used to prevent hostile work environments are provided.

20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness

8.0 % Thesis Development and Purpose

Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.

Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear.

Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose.

Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.

Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.

7.0 % Argument Logic and Construction

Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.

Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.

Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.

Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.

Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.

5.0 % Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used.

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present.

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used.

Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

10.0 %Format

5.0 % Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.

Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.

Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.

Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.

All format elements are correct.

5.0 % Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)

Sources are not documented.

Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

100 % Total Weightage

Bottom of Form