Can-an-organization-self-report-a-violation-Are-they-required-to-self-report-Will-self-reporting-make-the-investigation-easier-on-them-

/in /by

Question 1:

Can an organization self-report a violation? Are they required to self-report? Will self-reporting make the investigation easier on them?

Question 2:

President Obama signed the Elder Justice Act into law in 2010. Research this law and Alabama’ toolkit found here: Elder Justice and Advocacy . Then, research your state to find out what the law is regarding Elder Abuse. Post your findings detailing what the law is, the agency responsible, and how to report suspected abuse.

Question 3:

What are your thoughts about use of the internet for medical information? Is it good for the average consumer to seek out information there?

Question 4:

Exactly how does a health care provider protect paper and electronically records? What are some of the common methods used? How can we be assured that PHI is released only to those we authorize.

Week-4-Changes-in-non-academic-life

/in /by

Reflect on your personal growth during your time as a LIB major. Have you grown or changed in your non-academic life? If so, how? Do you think differently about what you see on TV or the internet? Do you have different reading habits? Have your relationships with family members and coworkers changed at all? Are you a better citizen? Are you a better human being? Discuss your personal growth in two to three pages.

discuss-this

/in /by

New products fail at a disturbing rate. Recent studies put the rate at 95 percent in the United States and 90 percent in Europe. Find two products that have “failed” (been introduced then withdrawn from the market by the company) and suggest the cause or causes of these product failures.

How are new technologies, like 3d printing) affecting the product development process? Do you think that will affect product failure rate? How?

Unit-II-Case-Study-unit-addresses-the-role-of-the-technology-professional-in-an-organization

/in /by

Unit II Case Study

Introduction:

This unit addresses the role of the technology professional in an organization and how information technology (IT) systems influence organizational strategies. This case study analyzes two retailers’ business models and strategies. Then, it looks at the role that technology and IT personnel play in the assigned business case, and, finally, makes the connection between how IT influences those organizational strategies. This assignment allows you to recall the learned concepts and shows you how to apply those concepts to show a logical alignment between those requirements learned in this unit and the assignment.

Assignment Instructions:

Analyze the case study titled “Who’s the World’s Top Retailer? Walmart and Amazon Duke It Out” on pp. 116-118 of your textbook.

For this assignment, you will need to:

1. analyze the case study comparing Walmart and Amazon’s business models and business strategies,

2. explain the role that information technology plays in each of these businesses and describe the role of the various IT professionals involved in this case,

3. explain how IT helps influence Walmart and Amazon’s organizational strategies, and

4. summarize your findings in a two- to three-page paper.

Information about accessing the Blackboard Grading Rubric for this assignment is provided below.

Unit III PowerPoint

IT Support of Business Processes

Introduction:

The main learning outcome of this unit addresses the importance of software, hardware, and telecommunications to a business. This involves the support of current and new, emerging technologies to the business. The assignment is a good assessment because you have to think of areas of an organization that could benefit by emerging technologies. You will MBA 5401, Management Information Systems 3

need to research the technology’s capabilities and discuss the advantages the technology will offer an organization. This way, you have to be able to assess how technology supports business.

Assignment Instructions:

Imagine that you are an IT manager charged with keeping up with current technology. Create a PowerPoint presentation for the chief information officer that provides an overview of two areas that you want to update based on emerging technologies. Be sure to provide the new technologies’ capabilities and the advantages they will bring to the organization.

Be sure to cite all sources used in a reference slide with proper APA formatting. Be sure to provide at least two scholarly sources from the CSU Online Library. Your PowerPoint presentation must contain eight to ten slides; the cover and reference slides do not count in the length requirement.

You may also use the speaker’s notes function for the presentation part of your PowerPoint and provide transitions from one slide to the next.

Below you will find a helpful resource created by the CSU Success Center on developing APA-style PowerPoint presentations:

https://columbiasouthern.adobeconnect.com/_a117488…

If you need additional help, contact the CSU Success Center.

Information about accessing the Blackboard Grading Rubric for this assignment is provided below.

Unit VI Case Study

Introduction:

The main learning outcome for this unit addresses advanced information systems solutions. You need to be able to understand not only the concepts behind implementing an advanced solution like ERP, but also the management and technological factors involved in an implementation, the value added by implementing advanced systems, what prompts the need for an advanced system like an ERP system, and the potential benefits of implementing IS advanced systems such as ERP systems. This case gives them a successfully implemented case to analyze.

Assignment Instructions:

Review what you have learned about enterprise resource planning (ERP) from the textbook and from the unit’s study guide.

Analyze the case study titled “Vodafone: A Giant Global ERP Implementation” on pp. 376-378 in your textbook.

For this assignment, you will need to:

1. analyze and discuss the central issue(s) faced by Vodafone, including the contributing management and technological factors;

2. explain why ERP was a necessary information system solution to address the organization’s issues;

3. evaluate the success of Vodafone’s implementation plan and provide one suggestion to improve the process;

4. discuss the value the new ERP system brought to Vodafone as a company; and

5. summarize your findings in a two to three page paper.

Information about accessing the Blackboard Grading Rubric for this assignment is provided below.

Diabetes-and-Drug-Treatments-

/in /by

Assignment 2

Reflect on differences between types of diabetes including type 1, type 2, gestational, and juvenile diabetes.

  • Select one type of diabetes.
  • Consider one type of drug used to treat the type of diabetes you selected including proper preparation and administration of this drug. Then, reflect on dietary considerations related to treatment.
  • Think about the short-term and long-term impact of the diabetes you selected on patients including effects of drug treatments.
  • Write a 3- to 5- page paper that addresses the following:
    • Explain the differences between types of diabetes including type 1, type 2, gestational, and juvenile diabetes.
    • Describe one type of drug used to treat the type of diabetes you selected including proper preparation and administration of this drug. Include dietary considerations related to treatment.
    • Explain the short-term and long-term impact of this diabetes on patients including effects of drugs treatments.

    http://web.b.ebscohost.com.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/…

  • Excellent Good Fair Poor
    Quality of Work Submitted:
    The extent of which work meets the assigned criteria and work reflects graduate level critical and analytic thinking.
    Points:
    Points Range: 27
    (27%) – 30
    (30%)


    Assignment
    exceeds expectations. All topics are addressed with a minimum of 75% containing
    exceptional breadth and depth about
    each of the assignment topics.
    Feedback:

    Points:
    Points Range: 24
    (24%) – 26
    (26%)


    Assignment meets expectations. All topics are addressed with a minimum of 50% containing
    good breadth and depth about
    each of the assignment topics.
    Feedback:

    Points:
    Points Range: 21
    (21%) – 23
    (23%)


    Assignment meets most of the expectations. One required topic is either not addressed or inadequately addressed.
    Feedback:

    Points:
    Points Range: 0
    (0%) – 20
    (20%)


    Assignment superficially meets some of the expectations. Two or more required topics are either not addressed or inadequately addressed.
    Feedback:

    Quality of Work Submitted:
    The purpose of the paper is clear.
    Points:
    Points Range: 5
    (5%) – 5
    (5%)


    A clear and comprehensive purpose statement is provided which delineates all required criteria.
    Feedback:

    Points:
    Points Range: 4
    (4%) – 4
    (4%)


    Purpose of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.
    Feedback:

    Points:
    Points Range: 3.5
    (3.5%) – 3.5
    (3.5%)


    Purpose of the assignment is vague or off topic.
    Feedback:

    Points:
    Points Range: 0
    (0%) – 3
    (3%)


    No purpose statement was provided.
    Feedback:

    Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas:
    The extend to which the work reflects the student’s ability to:

    Understand and interpret the assignment’s key concepts.

    Points:
    Points Range: 9
    (9%) – 10
    (10%)


    Demonstrates the ability to critically appraise and intellectually explore key concepts.
    Feedback:

    Points:
    Points Range: 8
    (8%) – 8
    (8%)


    Demonstrates a clear understanding of key concepts.
    Feedback:

    Points:
    Points Range: 7
    (7%) – 7
    (7%)


    Shows some degree of understanding of key concepts.
    Feedback:

    Points:
    Points Range: 0
    (0%) – 6
    (6%)


    Shows a lack of understanding of key concepts, deviates from topics.
    Feedback:

    Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas:
    The extend to which the work reflects the student’s ability to:

    Apply and integrate material in course resources (i.e. video, required readings, and textbook) and credible outside resources.

    Points:
    Points Range: 18
    (18%) – 20
    (20%)


    Demonstrates and applies exceptional support of major points and integrates 2 or more credible outside sources, in addition to 2-3 course resources to suppport point of view.
    Feedback:

    Points:
    Points Range: 16
    (16%) – 17
    (17%)


    Integrates specific information from 1 credible outside resource and 2-3 course resources to support major points and point of view.
    Feedback:

    Points:
    Points Range: 14
    (14%) – 15
    (15%)


    Minimally includes and integrates specific information from 2-3 resources to support major points and point of view.
    Feedback:

    Points:
    Points Range: 0
    (0%) – 13
    (13%)


    Includes and integrates specific information from 0 to 1 resoruce to support major points and point of view.
    Feedback:

    Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas:
    The extend to which the work reflects the student’s ability to:

    Synthesize (combines various components or different ideas into a new whole) material in course resources (i.e. video, required readings, textbook) and outside, credible resources by comparing different points of view and highlighting similarities, differences, and connections.

    Points:
    Points Range: 18
    (18%) – 20
    (20%)


    Synthesizes and justifies (defends, explains, validates, confirms) information gleaned from sources to support major points presented. Applies meaning to the field of advanced nursing practice.
    Feedback:

    Points:
    Points Range: 16
    (16%) – 17
    (17%)


    Summarizes information gleaned from sources to support major points, but does not synthesize.
    Feedback:

    Points:
    Points Range: 14
    (14%) – 15
    (15%)


    Identifies but does not interpret or apply concepts, and/or strategies correctly; ideas unclear and/or underdeveloped.
    Feedback:

    Points:
    Points Range: 0
    (0%) – 13
    (13%)


    Rarely or does not interpret, apply, and synthesize concepts, and/or strategies.
    Feedback:

    Written Expression and Formatting

    Paragraph and Sentence Structure: Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are clearly structured and carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance.

    Points:
    Points Range: 5
    (5%) – 5
    (5%)


    Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity
    Feedback:

    Points:
    Points Range: 4
    (4%) – 4
    (4%)


    Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity 80% of the time.
    Feedback:

    Points:
    Points Range: 3.5
    (3.5%) – 3.5
    (3.5%)


    Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity 60%- 79% of the time.
    Feedback:

    Points:
    Points Range: 0
    (0%) – 3
    (3%)


    Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity < 60% of the time.
    Feedback:

    Written Expression and Formatting

    English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation

    Points:
    Points Range: 5
    (5%) – 5
    (5%)


    Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.
    Feedback:

    Points:
    Points Range: 4
    (4%) – 4
    (4%)


    Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
    Feedback:

    Points:
    Points Range: 3.5
    (3.5%) – 3.5
    (3.5%)


    Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
    Feedback:

    Points:
    Points Range: 0
    (0%) – 3
    (3%)


    Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.
    Feedback:

    Written Expression and Formatting

    The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.

    Points:
    Points Range: 5
    (5%) – 5
    (5%)


    Uses correct APA format with no errors.
    Feedback:

    Points:
    Points Range: 4
    (4%) – 4
    (4%)


    Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors.
    Feedback:

    Points:
    Points Range: 3.5
    (3.5%) – 3.5
    (3.5%)


    Contains several (3-4) APA format errors.
    Feedback:

    Points:
    Points Range: 0
    (0%) – 3
    (3%)


    Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.
    Feedback:




    Quality of Work Submitted:
    The extent of which work meets the assigned criteria and work reflects graduate level critical and analytic thinking.—

    Levels of Achievement:

    27
    (27%) – 30
    (30%)

    Assignment
    exceeds expectations. All topics are addressed with a minimum of 75% containing
    exceptional breadth and depth about
    each of the assignment topics.

    24
    (24%) – 26
    (26%)

    Assignment meets expectations. All topics are addressed with a minimum of 50% containing
    good breadth and depth about
    each of the assignment topics.

    21
    (21%) – 23
    (23%)

    Assignment meets most of the expectations. One required topic is either not addressed or inadequately addressed.

    0
    (0%) – 20
    (20%)

    Assignment superficially meets some of the expectations. Two or more required topics are either not addressed or inadequately addressed.
    Feedback:

    Quality of Work Submitted:
    The purpose of the paper is clear.—

    Levels of Achievement:

    5
    (5%) – 5
    (5%)

    A clear and comprehensive purpose statement is provided which delineates all required criteria.

    4
    (4%) – 4
    (4%)

    Purpose of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.

    3.5
    (3.5%) – 3.5
    (3.5%)

    Purpose of the assignment is vague or off topic.

    0
    (0%) – 3
    (3%)

    No purpose statement was provided.
    Feedback:

    Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas:
    The extend to which the work reflects the student’s ability to:

    Understand and interpret the assignment’s key concepts.—

    Levels of Achievement:

    9
    (9%) – 10
    (10%)

    Demonstrates the ability to critically appraise and intellectually explore key concepts.

    8
    (8%) – 8
    (8%)

    Demonstrates a clear understanding of key concepts.

    7
    (7%) – 7
    (7%)

    Shows some degree of understanding of key concepts.

    0
    (0%) – 6
    (6%)

    Shows a lack of understanding of key concepts, deviates from topics.
    Feedback:

    Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas:
    The extend to which the work reflects the student’s ability to:

    Apply and integrate material in course resources (i.e. video, required readings, and textbook) and credible outside resources.—

    Levels of Achievement:

    18
    (18%) – 20
    (20%)

    Demonstrates and applies exceptional support of major points and integrates 2 or more credible outside sources, in addition to 2-3 course resources to suppport point of view.

    16
    (16%) – 17
    (17%)

    Integrates specific information from 1 credible outside resource and 2-3 course resources to support major points and point of view.

    14
    (14%) – 15
    (15%)

    Minimally includes and integrates specific information from 2-3 resources to support major points and point of view.

    0
    (0%) – 13
    (13%)

    Includes and integrates specific information from 0 to 1 resoruce to support major points and point of view.
    Feedback:

    Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas:
    The extend to which the work reflects the student’s ability to:

    Synthesize (combines various components or different ideas into a new whole) material in course resources (i.e. video, required readings, textbook) and outside, credible resources by comparing different points of view and highlighting similarities, differences, and connections.—

    Levels of Achievement:

    18
    (18%) – 20
    (20%)

    Synthesizes and justifies (defends, expla

    • powerpoint-presentation-on-sjogren-disease

    /in /by

    I need a powerpoint presentation on sjogren disease

    analysis-of-short-film-English-homework-help

    /in /by

    1. Watch Eye Contact ( at least once through without stopping and once again to take notes after each of the three segments.
    2. Use your notes to write a three paragraph film critique. This will be your presentation script for your review of Eye Contact.
    3. Your critique should cover the following material in three well-developed paragraphs. Be sure to use transitions between ideas and between paragraphs. Your critique should flow smoothly.

    paragraph one:

    Begin by immediately rating the film (“Eye Contact deserves 4 out of 5 stars!” for example.). The rest of your presentation will explain your rating. Include in this first paragraph a brief summary of the important story elements of the film. Who are the characters? Where does the action of the film take place? What happens? What do you think the film maker wants you to think, feel, or do while watching? Refer back to the notes taken while watching.

    paragraph two:

    Discuss the suspense techniques used in the movie. Which literary suspense techniques (foreshadowing, flashback, imagery, etc.) are present in the film? Which techniques specific to film (camera angles, types of shots, soundtrack, and special effects) are used to create suspense? Are the techniques used effectively? Why or why not? Be sure to describe specifics from the film in the same way you would quote “textual evidence” in an essay. Refer back to the notes taken while watching the film.

    paragraph three:

    Discuss the overall quality of this short film. What are its strengths? What suggestions would you make for improvement? What about the film will you remember most? Refer back to your notes taken while watching.

    4. As you write and prepare your review, think about the tone of the professional critiques you have read. Remember to use your words and convey your ideas in such a way that is respectful and persuasive. Use specific examples to support your review.

    5. If possible, record your critique as either a video or an audio presentation. Speak with your instructor if you need help recording and attaching your presentation. If you are not able to record your presentation, your parent or guardian may use the scoring rubric to assess your presentation.

    Land-Grant-University

    /in /by

    urgent 300 words see attachment

    Bank-Reconciliation-accounting-assignment-help-

    /in /by

    Attached is the discussion instructions as well as the required reading material (chapter 4). Please answer each question substantively using the reading material to support claims and examples. Here is the reference for the chapter reading:

    Wainwright, S. K. (Ed.). (2012). Principles of Accounting: Volume I

    PKI-and-Cryptographic-Applications

    /in /by

    ·Asymmetric Cryptography

    ·Asymmertric Key Management

    ·Applied Cryptography

    ·Cryptographic Attacks