Please choose a residential structure you have been in and are familiar with. For example, your childhood home or Rolla in Missouri apartment, fraternity or sorority, residence hall, hotel, relative’s house, vacation home, etc. Research the history of the building including the designer/architect (if known), when it was built, and any historical significance of the building. Secondly, tell me what you consider the architecture of that structure shows about it, its intended use, its designers and builders, and the time period it was built. What did the designers of the structure want to convey? Were they successful?

Make sure you answer the following questions:

• Where is it?
• What is it?
• When was it built (& modified)?
• What “style or styles” is it?
• Who designed it, built it and who lived there?
• Why was it built? Has this reason changed over time?
• How has the structure changed over time?
• What does the structure tell us about the builders, residents, and society; both when it was built and how this changed over time?

This is not strictly a research paper. I want your informed view of the structure and not simply data about it. What do you think? What is your analysis of the building? Make sure to back up your judgments with evidence. Photos, plans, etc. are encouraged but not mandatory.

The paper should be about 1250 words. A title page is not required but please put your name, the date, and the course and section (Hist 4550 A or B) at the top of your paper. If you use outside sources, please cite them by whatever system you are most comfortable with; APA, MLA, Turabian/Chicago, etc. History majors must use Turabian/Chicago.

Helpful hints:

Make sure your paper is well constructed and free of grammatical errors and spelling mistakes.

Introductions and conclusions are important. Use them properly.

For further information, please see: http://academic.bowdoin.edu/WritingGuides/ (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.

A. What is the leadership paradox? Give some reasons why a leader can encounter difficulty in newly formed teams or groups using a participative management system. Support your discussion with at least two (2) external sources.

B. Present a discussion of the strategies for encouraging participative management in the workforce, and how to implement each of these strategies. Support your discussion with at least two (2) external sources.

C. What serious biases or misassumptions do groups that are involved in inter-team conflict sometimes experience? How do these biases and prejudices affect the ability of teams to accomplish their goals? Support your discussion with at least two (2) external sources.

Need 400 words for initial response and I will post a discussion personally for which I need 200 words reply.

for initial response you must have two academic peer-reviewed articles for references

Write a response (minimum of 250 words) to the question below after doing this week’s readings. Make reference to specific quotes and pages in the reading, with page numbers and ( fote-note in chicago style) .: No out resources use this book resources: (( Robert W. Strayer and Eric W. Nelson, Ways of the World: A Brief Global History with Sources vol. 1, 3rd Edition
(2016) AND Thinking Through Sources.))

These readings make it clear that travel on the Silk Roads could be dangerous. What motivated people to travel these routes when this danger was present? How did their travels change the world around them?

Use the practice problem and a qualitative, peer-reviewed research article you identified in the Topic 1 assignment to complete this assignment.

In a 1000-1,250 word essay, summarize the study, explain the ways in which the findings might be used in nursing practice, and address ethical considerations associated with the conduct of the study.

Refer to the resource “Research Critique Guidelines” for suggested headings and content for your paper.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

Remember that the goals of qualitative research are to describe, explain, predict and control and that the sampling is generally small. Please review the rubric for this assignment. Also please be sure that your article states it is a qualitative research report. Look for the word qualitative in the title or abstract. Do not use the article if you do not see the word Qualitative unless you send it to me for review. I cannot grade an assignment that is quantitative or mixed research. Also it cannot be a review of research but must be a primary report. If the article says that previous research was used to write the research this is a literature review and cannot be used. If you are unsure of an article please send me the article to review.

The essay or research of 10 paper should contain the following:

1. A thesis statement that identifies your figure’s main argument and supporting claims that will be the focus of your paper;
2. Relevant historical or political context that readers need to know in order to understand your analysis;
3. A thorough analysis of your figure’s rhetorical strategies (that is, how s/he is attempting to persuade their audience, and for what purpose). Use quotes and examples from your figure’s speeches, writings, or interviews to support your analysis;
4. A thorough evaluation of the persuasive value of his or her rhetoric–is it persuasive? Is it truthful? Deceitful? Explain why you find it persuasive or unpersuasive and truthful or deceitful (or a combination).
5. A substantive discussion of the significance of this figure and why understanding this person’s rhetoric is important.

Your paper should have the following additional features:
1. It must contain at least one primary source of rhetoric from your chosen figure, but it can also combine multiple (for example, you may analyze one speech or a pastiche of speeches).
2. It must contain at least 2 additional resources, not from your figure, to support your analysis.
3. It must adhere to MLA citation format.
4. It must use language and style conventions appropriate for an academic audience.
5. It must be thoroughly edited.