Leadership and change, management homework help

Leadership Expert:

Work as Interviewer- Select a leader from an organization to interview. You must creatively design at least 7-8 questions that will enlighten your team members about a practical situation or occurrence that is related to “Leadership: Values, Ethics, and Character”. Include the questions, responses, and a brief summary about the interview in your deliverable.

•At least two pages

•Encouraged to be original and creative in your delivery of information. Television personalities are a MUST! A sense of humor coupled with accurate research is encouraged. Each deliverable must be accompanied by a minimum of 2 documented sources (limited to the textbook and one additional academic source).

unit-10-discussion-2

  • COURSE REFLECTION

    Resources

    Congratulations! You have reached the final unit of this course, and your journey through your first course at Capella University is almost complete. Communicating effectively through persuasion is an important skill that can help you in all aspects of your life. In this course, you have developed a foundation for critical thinking and persuasive writing that will be used throughout your program of study and can be applied in your professional work.In Unit 9, you had an opportunity to reflect on critical thinking skills. For this discussion, you will review the course competencies in the syllabus and reflect on the many competencies you have developed over the past ten weeks. In your discussion post, describe the following:

    • In what ways have you built your knowledge about psychology, your analytic and other critical thinking skills, your skills in library research, and professional communication skills?
    • Of which accomplishments are you most proud? Why?
    • Which skills do you believe you still need to work on? Why?

    G.R.E.A.T. DISCUSSION AND FEEDBACK GUIDELINES WITH CHECKLIST

    Introduction

    Engaging in learning through participation in course discussions is a result of effective communications. This document guides you in creating substantive discussion posts and providing responses to create a learning community. The guidelines in Parts 1, 2, and 3 assure that communications are effective. Use the checklist in Part 4 as a guide for self-assessment before posting in the courseroom.

    1. Substantive Discussion Posts

    At the core of all Capella University courses is a public discussion of issues pertinent to the topics at hand. Typically, in each unit you will compose postings as directed in the unit activities. Your postings are placed in the area of the courseroom where discussion takes place. You are required to post substantively on the specific topic. You may ask, what is meant by
    substantively?To understand what comprises a substantive discussion post, remember these components of a
    G.R.E.A.T. posting:
    Grammar rules apply! Make sure your posts are written correctly and effectively.
    Relevance is important. Your posts should pertain to the readings, the assignment, or to the ongoing discussion.
    Engage your audience! Incorporate your interpretation of the topic or issue. Apply and analyze research.
    Add value to the discussion. Provide insight, connect current events, share career connections, and/or explain your positions and perspectives.
    Timeliness is important! Post your main post by Thursday at 11:59 p.m. and your interactive posts by Sunday at 11:59 p.m.A general guideline for your main posting is to answer the assignment in 300–800 words. If you have more to say about a topic, you should do so. If you have said everything that you can about a question and cannot meet the general guideline, it is better to post what you have than to add irrelevant material just to increase the word count. Your instructor will evaluate your postings using the assignment’s scoring guide and based on what you wrote rather than how many words you used.

    2. Responses to Other Learners

    Capella learners bring a wealth of experiences to the course, building and engaging our courseroom learning community. As a member of the learning community, you are expected to respond to the posts of your peers. Your responses should address the substance of what was written. Learning is a social experience; others are depending on your insightfulness and contributions. A good technique is to react and ask the author questions about what he or she wrote. This accomplishes two useful things: first, you will think more carefully about what was written if you have to ask a question about it, and second, it stimulates discussion.You should be supportive and encouraging of your peers. If you read something that you like or that you think was well written, say so. This may only entail writing a comment such as, “That is a really interesting point of view,” or “I agree completely,” or “You express your ideas so clearly.” However, simple agreement or disagreement should be accompanied with substantive reasons, examples, and evidence. Concluded by asking questions is an excellent way to encourage others to share their experiences with the topic.Finally, we believe that Capella learners find it helpful and enjoyable to take time to build and participate in our online learning community. Your peers are valuable resources for you on the topic being discussed. Typically, your peers have different experiences in their career fields and have a great deal to share with you. All are interested in forming close ties to you and others—ties that can provide support when you need it, and voices with whom to debate and share ideas. Being a member of a good learning community is among the most valuable aspects of your time at Capella as you achieve your educational goals.

    3. Guidelines for Effective Feedback

    What is Effective Feedback?

    One of your responsibilities to yourself and your learning community is to contribute to the process of giving and receiving feedback. To help support a positive learning experience at Capella, there are guidelines for giving and receiving such feedback. Substantive detail in your feedback is a part of your weekly interactive learning discussions. However, most courses at Capella also use a formal peer review process for giving and receiving feedback on course papers and projects.Effective feedback:

    • Honors competence and reinforces behaviors.
    • Aligns expectations and course work priorities.
    • Fills gaps in knowledge.
    • Supports individuals to take corrective action.
    • Directs individuals toward meeting learning goals.
    Giving Feedback

    The following is a list of tips for giving effective feedback.

    • Plan your feedback. Making notes first may help you decide what you want to say and how you want to say it.
    • Direct your comments strictly to the work and ideas in the discussion without any personal comments.
    • Be specific. If something is not working, identify it and describe why it does not work for you.
    • Open new avenues for change by suggesting alternative ways to accomplish the same task or goal.
    • Be liberal with praise for an idea you like.
    • Be diplomatic and honest at the same time.
    • Ask questions for clarity.
    • Acknowledge valid points of view. Agree with what is true.
    • Explain yourself. Go beyond saying, “Good point!” Elaborate your comments with concisely written paragraphs.
    Receiving Feedback

    The following is a list of tips for receiving effective feedback.

    • Listen at all times, even in an online environment.
    • Be flexible and open-mined about the comments you are receiving.
    • Carefully consider what is being said before judging the merit and whether to accept or reject it.
    • Play devil’s advocate with your own work.
    • Prioritize the feedback you receive. Some learners use green, yellow, and red to categorize their revisions according to importance.
    • Remember, someone who disagrees with your work or ideas is not necessarily against you or your ideas. This person may be your best friend and support.

    4. Checklist for Discussion Posts

    Ask yourself the following questions when participating in the class dialog to improve the quality of the discussion and to support collaborative learning:

    1. Does my contribution fit with the dialog, or should I start a separate thread?
    2. Are my ideas logically organized into a persuasive argument with clearly written and mechanically clean prose?
    3. Are my ideas worthwhile, or do they just take up space?
    4. Is the central thesis statement clear whether it is direct or implied?
    5. Can the reader easily determine what my main point is?
    6. Does it provide sufficient, relevant, and interesting details?
    7. Are there sufficient explanations or examples to support generalizations?
    8. Does this contribution provide a series of points that add up to an argument supporting the main point?
    9. Does the contribution proceed logically from point to point? Is the paragraph structure logical? Are there appropriate transition words between ideas? Does it flow?
    10. Are there any contradictions? If so, are the points connected?
    11. Has discussion area etiquette been observed?
    12. Is my point of view clear to the reader?
    13. Is the tone appropriate and respectful of others’ ideas?
    14. Is my contribution concise, precise, and free of grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors?
    15. If other authors are referenced, is the appropriate APA reference citation provided? (This rule is in effect in Units 2–10.)

Multimedia-activity-Business-Organization-business-and-finance-homework-help

Visit the Choose Your Business Structure (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. section of the U.S. Small Business Administration’s website.

If you were to start your own business, which business entity structure would you choose? Justify why your chosen structure is the best organizational form.

Explain the following business structures: sole proprietorship, partnership, LLC, and a corporation. In your analysis address the following for each business structure:

  • Steps to form
  • Personal liability for owners
  • Taxation
  • Advantages and disadvantages

Your paper must be three to five pages (excluding title and reference pages), and it must be formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center. You must cite at least two scholarly sources in addition to the course textbook. Cite your sources in-text and on the reference page. For information regarding APA samples and tutorials, visit the Ashford Writing Center (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site..

Note: Please make sure that there should not be any plagiarism issue and also please make sure to follow all the guide line of assignment and also standards of university.

Unit 1 Individual Project Offender Rehabilitation History

Please note that you are required to support your views by citing your sources in all assignments. Even if the question asks for your opinion, you are still expected to support your opinion with references to published works and other materials. APA format is necessary for your assignments when citing references, and assistance on how to cite in APA format is available using the APA Citation Center.
•Choose “Library” from the top navigation bar.
•Choose “APA Citation Center” from the left navigation bar.
•Click “Example Sources.”
•Scroll down, and click “APA Documentation.”
For more information on citing your sources, please click on the About this Course link in the classroom.
When examining the historical context of treatment in a correctional setting, it must be seen through both domestic and international viewpoints. Under the domestic view, the United States primarily uses a custodial model, which focuses on using incapacitation as the method of retribution and deterrence.
In contrast, the international view, specifically Europe, uses the rehabilitation model. This model focuses on rehabilitating the person to become a productive member of society.
In this assignment, compare and contrast the models of corrections from the perspectives of the United States and the United Kingdom. In this paper, explain which model you think provides the best treatment.
Assignment Guidelines:
•Using the library, course materials, textbook, and Web resources, research the custodial model of incarceration of the United States and the rehabilitation model of the United Kingdom.
•Address the following in a Word document of 2–3 pages: ◦How are these 2 models similar?
◦How are these 2 models different?
◦Which model do you feel is more effective at reducing the rate of recidivism?
◦Do you believe that both countries should adopt the same model of incarceration?
•Compile your findings and responses pertaining to the above information into a Word document of 2–3 pages, and submit the file to your instructor.
Please submit your assignment.

Content Validity – Response to Classmate’s Discussion Post – 1 Paragraph

Respond by Day 5 to at least one of your colleagues’ postings in one or more of the following ways:

  • Ask a probing question.
  • Share an insight from having read your colleague’s posting.
  • Offer and support an opinion.
  • Validate an idea with your own experience.
  • Make a suggestion.
  • Expand on your colleague’s posting.

Classmate’s Post:

“Per the Uniform Guidelines (1978), a job analysis is essential in order to identify the content of a job and to capture the appropriate work behaviors, necessary tasks, identify relevant knowledge and skills and to create operational definitions for all associated terms. By utilizing the job analysis in the creation of or selection of tests utilized in the selection process, the employer can be more confident that the selected candidate will be an appropriate fit. An effective job analysis can also ensure that the organization will be protected from certain potential complaints or missteps than can present themselves during the hiring/promotion process.

One rather obvious repercussion of utilizing tests that are not linked to the job analysis is that the selected candidate will not be the best candidate who can most effectively perform in the job. For example, part of the job analysis process includes the identifying of the necessary worker characteristics for the position (Russell, & Peterson, 2007). If the chosen test or assessment is not linked to a job analysis, it is likely that the chosen test will not be the most accurate assessment of what characteristics are needed for the job. If selected tests are not linked with a job analysis, the organization will be impacted by having employees who are likely not the best fit for their positions, as they were chosen based on the results of more arbitrary measures vs. being selected based on measures that are relevant to the job.

Failure to utilize tests that are linked to job analysis could also result in legal ramifications for the organization. Conducting a job analysis serves as an objective measure of the knowledge, skills and competencies necessary for the job. Without this foundation, organizations can open themselves up to being accused of participating in practices resulting in disparate or adverse impact against certain groups. This can then lead to litigation, and the challenging of the content validity of the selection measures used by the organization (Borden & Sharf, 2007). Testing that is linked to job analysis will serve as support that the job criteria and selection methods/procedures were fairly and objectively established.

Utilization of a testing process that is misaligned or not linked to a job analysis can have severe consequences for the organization. As discussed, there is the possibility that candidates, who are not the best fit for the job, will be chosen, and it also possible that the organization will open itself up to potential litigation. Both of these scenarios can have a negative impact on the bottom line of the company. Hiring or promoting of individuals that are not an appropriate fit can result in the company becoming less efficient, and customer service or production numbers may decline; while potential litigation will cost the company money and other resources. Both will adversely impact the reputation and the financial standing of the company.”

justify-law-of-demand

justify law of demand. Provide a case study…

vertigo-or-adam-s-rib-film

Description

Your review should present evaluative or interpretive claims about the film, not plot summary. You are not required to make any interpretive claims, but if your review leads you in that direction, that’s great. Evaluative claims need to be backed up by evidence in the form of examples from the film.

A film contains many components about which you may write—not all of which need be included in this one short paper. The acting, the cinematography, the mise en scène, the soundtrack, the editing, the lighting: all of these are elements you might discuss in your evaluation. Another element that provides possibilities is the plot, but here you must be careful not to veer into plot summary. Don’t just describe what happened, evaluate it.

Format

All of your papers must be typed and double-spaced. They should have a title and an opening paragraph that introduces the evaluation and the film in general before getting specific.

Grading

When I grade your papers, I will be focusing on the following elements:

  • Whether or not you make evaluative and/or interpretive claims
  • How sophisticated those claims are
  • Evidence used to support the claims
  • Grammar and mechanics

organic-chemistry-help-

I need help with organic chemistry synthesis homework. I will give log in info once I get a bid. Please complete assingments for chapters 13, 14 and 17. Click on practice next to the title. You have to complete at least 40 problems for me to get credit for the assignment. Please answer as many questions correctly as you can! To see how many problems you have done you have to click on my name and click my reports and view by chapters. It will show your percentage score and how many questions you’ve answered.

I will give log in info when I get a bid.

Create a flyer or brochure to present to the stakeholders

Your quality improvement plan is in place and you are ready to meet with a diverse group to discuss implementation. As the Chief Quality Officer, you need to lead your team, know who will do what, and set the tone for moving ahead. You also need to inform stakeholders of your plan and what you are doing to improve quality.

Create a flyer or brochure to present to the stakeholders, which includes:

  • how you plan to educate about and communicate the plan,
  • your timelines for implementing and evaluating the plan,
  • a summary of the proposed education and communication plan,
  • resources required,
  • role of technology,
  • staff engagement,
  • ideas to leverage creative tension, and
  • steps involved.

The Capital Asset Pricing Model , business and finance homework help

Using Yahoo! Finance find the value of beta for your reference company. Write a two page paper discussing the following items:

  1. What is the estimated beta coefficient of your company? What does this beta mean in terms of your choice to include this company in your overall portfolio?
  2. Given the beta of your company, the present yield to maturity on U.S. government bonds maturing in one year (currently about 4.5% annually) and an assessment that the market risk premium (that is – the difference between the expected rate of return on the ‘market portfolio’ and the risk-free rate of interest) is 6.5%, use the CAPM equation in order to find out what is the present ‘cost of equity’ of your company? Explain what is the meaning of the ‘cost of equity’.
  3. Choose two other companies, look up their “Beta” and report the names of these companies and their betas. Suppose you invest one third of your money in each of the stocks of these companies. What will the beta of the portfolio be? Given the data in (b), what will the Expected Rate of Return on this portfolio be? Do you feel that the three-stock portfolio is sufficiently diversified or does it still have risk that can be diversified away? Explain.

In a two-page report explain your answers thoroughly with references to the background materials. Make sure to demonstrate a strong understanding of the concept of beta and the risk/return trade off.