Social and Emotional Development

1. Behavior with adults

Did you see the child take leave of the parent in the morning? Describe:

Does the child seek the companionship of adults in preference to children? Does the child have an attachment to a particular adult?

How does the child seek adult approval and help?

Does the child accept adults’ suggestions and redirection? What is the child’s response to limits set by adults?

2. Behavior with other children

How does the child enter group play, e.g., immediately joins in or stands and observes first? Describe the child’s behavior in group play (e.g., leader, follower, both?)

Does the child seem to prefer to play alone? Describe and compare the child’s behavior with that of the other children. During what activities does the child prefer to play alone?

Does the child tend to play with a particular friend(s)? Describe.

When this child and another do not agree, what does the child do? (e.g., give in, compromise, holler for help, etc.)

3. Expression of feelings

How does the child show feelings of happiness and unhappiness? What other feelings did you see the child express?

How does the child show affection for another child or adult?

Did you see the child attempt to hurt another child either verbally or physically? What

seemed to be the provocation? How was the situation handled?

Did you see the child respond to frustration, such as having to wait for a toy? What did the child do?

4. Activity #3: Please use plan an activity that supports children’s interactions with each other.

Part II: The Activitiy

Based on your Specific DevelopmentalDomain Social and Emotional Development

and reflecting on the children’s interests,

you will plan an activity to do with a child or small group of children.

After getting

your planning guide approved by your lead teacher

, you will actually

implement the activity during your scheduled hours.

J

a. Identify the observed interests of the children that precipitated the

activity

b. Title and description of the activity

c.Materials needed and description of how to make/organize activity

d. How will the activity be presented or sharedwith the children?

Part III: Evaluate your activity afterwards:

a.Describe in detail how the children participated in your activity. Use

some of their actual words in wrtitng your description of ttheir participation.

b. What questions do you have about the children’s reactions?

c. How did you feel about the experience? What could be done differently

the nexttime you share in this activity with children?

DA 4: Review the following news item to motivate your discussion.

The Henry Ford of Heart Surgery

For our discussion, I am including below links to two articles. The first one is an article in Wall Street Journal titled The Henry Ford of Heart Surgery and the second is an editorial related to it. These offer insights on how an doctor in India is sustainably performing state-of-the-art open heart surgeries, a complex procedure, at high volume assembly line mode but with low costs, something considered hard to accomplish in the product-process matrix framework. Provide your opinion on what your learned from it in context of implications for operations management in healthcare industry.

The Henry Ford of Heart Surgery (clicking this link will download the article as a PDF file)

Editorial High Volume Efficient (clicking this link will download the article as a PDF file)

My friends post(Sample):

Society has been focusing strongly on new technology to improve quality of their lives. Newer machines are built with higher specs and/or added features and priced at a very high price point. Machines used in complex procedures such as assembly of a car or a surgery are extremely expensive, and so raises the costs of the service. Therefore customers must pay an extremely high price point for complex procedures to be done. Japan has been able to successfully create an assembly line system in order to reduce costs of manufacturing. Japanese automobile companies were able to sell their cars at an unbelievably low price point without compromising quality. Production rates were faster, had consistently high quality, and was able to sell their product for cheaper.

Just as many of the Japanese automobile companies had designed their assembly line system, Dr. Devi Shetty started developing a system to develop economies of scale within his hospitals. Hospitals have been known to be extremely expensive and take a lot of time. Devi Shetty’s assembly system has developed many heart surgeons who work faster because each of them only specialize on one or two things. By offering more beds, each surgeon was able to practice their skills more often and developed to the point where they were much faster with the procedure than many other surgeons.

A number of outside doctors and surgeons commented that quality may be at risk when high volume of surgeries are being done. But as results showed, this was not the case for Dr. Shetty’s hospitals. Instead, quality got better because the surgeons were able to get more practice from the high volume of surgeries done. Dr. Shetty offers very low prices for his services because he is trying to sell high volume for lower prices instead of low volume for high prices. By doing so, I think that Dr. Shetty’s model benefits society far more than the hospitals which invest in expensive equipment and charge high prices. Even if a hospital is able to afford the expensive equipment, if the surgeons do not have much experience using the machine, it is just as, or possibly more, risky in quality for the patients.

Going to give this another try since the first one turned out so poorly. The attached paper is written in substandard English, in some cases nonsense, has some obvious copy/paste pieces from the example that wouldn’t normally be there (section titles, paragraph headings) and fails to meet the instructions/requirements in several places (missing Table of Figures in paper and TOC, transmittal letter expertise section specified to be written in third-person was written in first-person, etc.) I would like for someone to go through the instructions and supplements, and make the paper correct. I don’t need a rewrite from scratch, but it needs to make sense, be APA formatted, actually address the RFP/background, and most important follow the task requirements. I’m including a key below to make sense of the attached documents.

NEED_REVISION_Cloud_Migration_Proposal.docx – The paper that needs to be revised.

Instructions_Task_Requirements.docx – The actual instructions and requirements for the paper.

Instructions_Tips_and_Format_Example.docx – Tips for completing the paper and a basic example of the format.

Supplement_Request_for_Proposals-1.docx – The Request for Proposal (RFP) the paper is an answer to.

Supplement_RFP_Questions_from_Vendors.docx – Questions vendors asked of the RFP issuer for more guidance.

Supplement_Seamus_Company_Context.docx – Background information for the ‘company’ that issued the RFP.

Health Promotion

Sally has just had her 65th birthday and becomes concerned about her aging process. She has come to you today to discuss how best she can promote good health as she becomes an elder. Think about how you could advise her on immunizations along with methods to keep her body and mind healthy including nutrition, exercise and socialization. The aging process can gradually cause a diminishing of your mental faculties so include mental exercise also.

Remember that you only want to give her advice on those interventions that are evidence-based and come originally from peer-reviewed journal sources. Be sure to list these in your reference section. Below is a link to a list of evidence-based sources you can find on the internet.

http://www.cochrane.org/evidence

Instructions:

1. Make a list of at least 12 recommendations that meet the criteria above and cover various categories as mentioned in the case study.
2. Your paper should be:
   • One (1) page or more.
   • Use factual information from the textbook and/or appropriate articles and websites.
   • Cite your sources – type references according to the APA Style Guide.

Assessment Instructions

The final assessment for this course is the completion of a formal APA-formatted research proposal. You must use the Research Methods Template, (attached). Your proposal should reflect revisions you made based on the feedback you received on Assessments 2 and 3 (will be provided as I receive them).

Proposals should be approximately 15–20 pages in length (not including the references and title page), follow APA format, and contain the following elements in the order listed below:

1. Title page (not included in 15–20 page requirement).
2. Abstract (120 words or less) (Note that this is a separate page.).
3. Introduction: a summary of your proposal and the research questions under study (1 page).
4. Literature review (5–6 pages).
5. Methods section (4–6 pages) that includes the following subsections:
   1. Research design selection and rationale (1 page).
   2. Participants.
   3. Instruments.
   4. Data analysis plan.
6. Discussion of your expected findings (1–2 pages).
7. Conclusion (1–2 paragraphs wrapping up the proposal).
8. References (not included in 15–20 page requirement).

Additional Instructions

• Written communication: Written communication should be free of errors that detract from the overall message.
• APA formatting: Your proposal should be formatted according to APA (6th ed.) style and formatting.
• Length: A typical response will be 15–20 typed and double-spaced pages, not including references and title page.
• Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 point.