Legal Pitfalls for International Business

International businesses invariably face distinctions between the legal systems they work within. After reviewing some of the distinctions in your text between common and civil law systems, and after conducting additional outside research on the pitfalls faced by international businesses operating in multiple legal environments, write a paper that evaluates the following:

  1. The five key distinctions in contract or business law (other than those listed in Chapter 6): Political and Legal Systems in National Environments, reflecting different methods of practice or enforcement.
  2. The classic theories of international trade. Which theories do you believe are relevant today?
  3. Proactive actions that firms can take to minimize country risk.

When writing your paper, be sure to follow these guidelines:

Project charter: using this case to complete the project charter

) Complete the project charter worksheet and submit it to your instructor. You may earn up to 20 points for this assignment. The grading rubric is attached.

3) Remember!

  • Part I Executive Summary: What is the Project’s Objective?
    • Use the format [Infinitive Verb] [Noun] where Noun = the main deliverable of the project
  • Part IV Risk Assessment
    • For Risk, use the format [If uncertain event occurs] [Then impact to the project]

Hint: Before attempting to complete the project charter, review ALL of your reading assignments. Particularly, make sure to cover the sections below from the HBSP Tutorial:

Learn Module

  • Project Management Overview
  • What is project management?
  • Why is it important?
  • What is the process?
  • Overlapping tasks and activities

Identifying Project Needs and Objectives

  • Uncover the root of the problem
  • Brainstorm alternatives
  • Key idea: define project objectives
  • Align objectives

Understanding Competing Demands and “Scope Creep”

  • Balance competing demands
  • Activity: juggling demands
  • Beware of “scope creep”
  • Activity: managing scope creep

Defining Roles and Responsibilities

  • Project sponsor
  • Project manager
  • Leadership insight: clarify roles
  • Project team leader
  • Project team members
  • Project stakeholders

Creating a Project Charter

  • Elements of a project charter
  • The value of a project charter
  • Communicating the project charter

Note that you may not have complete information about the project and/or the organization. You are welcome to use the free web to find additional information or stretch your imagination. When complete information is not available, it is okay to make assumptions. You can always revise these assumptions when more information becomes available. In other words, some of your information may be fictional.

History analysis: Methods of Historical Inquiry​ and the Thucydides

Hello, i need help writing a History analysis about Methods of Historical Inquiry and the Thucydides

Attached:

-Essay format posted attached: 1) an introduction with a thesis, (2) at least 3 paragraphs of body discussing the evidence for your thesis, (3) an interesting conclusion.

– Methods of Historical Inquiry attached

-NO PLAGIARISM, NO OUTSIDE SOUCES (only sources posted from me) attached

Requirements:

– Use academic language (no first person “I” or “me”)

– Use quotations from the primary sources posted only to argue the points strongly

– Use footnotes to cite the primary sources

Prompt: Thucydides was one of the first writers of history and we have learned about his techniques in “Methods of Historical Inquiry”. Write a well-developed essay explaining 2 problems Thucydides finds in historical writing before his time. Why are these problematic? Then, explain 2 methods Thucydides says he will use to write better historical accounts. Why are these more reliable ways to do history? (Your thesis statement should briefly point out the 2 problems and the 2 new methods by Thucydides).

final edit and proofread of your revised draft, writing homework help

You are now ready to make a final edit and proofread of your revised draft. At this stage, you have already made substantive revisions to your work. You are now fine-tuning your writing to ensure you have correct grammar and punctuation and that there are no other errors. Congratulations!

To prepare for this Assignment:

  • Review the Learning Resources on proofreading.
  • Review the Learning Resources on grammar and punctuation.

The Assignment:

Revise the three paragraphs from the Week 6 Assignment again, ensuring you have completed a full and careful proofreading of your 1- to 2-page evaluative narrative. Make certain to submit a clean copy of your work without any track changes or comments by either yourself or your Instructor.

By Day 7

Submit your Assignment using the Walden Course Paper template. Your final draft should be 1-2 pages long.

Monica, you are on the right track here, but I am seeing quite a few unclear sentences. Remember to aim for simple and clear. You want to make sure your readers can easily follow your content.

Also, please see my notes about your sources and documentation. They are very important. You can find my feedback in the attached file.

Thank you so much!

Crystal

Probable Cause

Probable Cause:

Compare the Aguilar two-prong test with the Illinois v. Gates decision. The Aguilar two-prong test is found in Aguilar v. Texas, 378 U.S. 108 (1964). The Gates test is found in Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213 (1983). You might want to discuss how Spinelli fits into this, too.


To complete this activity, please do not exceed two type-written pages. This is not a major research paper, but rather a means in which to show me that you are understanding the material and can apply it to a specific topic. However, you must cite to any material that you obtain from other sources than your own thoughts. A failure to do so will result in a 0. Also, when providing your references, you must use proper citation. Plagiarism is not tolerated

I need help with Week 6 – this is a PowerPoint Presentation

THIS WEEK – POWERPOINT PRESENTATION ON ETHICAL CASE AUTOPSY

No rubric – the following is the professor’s email about the presentation – I have also included a paper I found on Course Hero about the subject. I would like to do this on young mothers who get addicted to drugs and lose their children. I see a lot of them in the hospital due to cellulitis from shooting up.




Ethical Case Autopsy- In Week 6, the syllabus says small groups will present a case study of an ethical dilemma that someone in the group has encountered in their work. Since we have only seven students in this class, each student will present their own case. It is a straightforward assignment that includes:

1. From your own professional history, in whatever clinical institution, choose a case involving an ethical dilemma. Remember that not only not every happening presents an ethical dilemma. It will simplify this process for you if you select as clearly cut a dilemma as possible.

2. Outline the facts of the case, and analyze the actions and outcomes of it, according to the most likely of the four ethical approaches we went over in class, and contained in O’Toole’s paper in Week One’s resources.

3. Offer an alternative ethical approach, using another of the four ethical approaches, and analyze what would have been done differently with this approach, and how the outcomes might possibly have changed.

Week 6 Reading Journal Essay

Submit a 2-3 page essay on the two most striking ideas you recorded in your reading journal entries, during the past 5 weeks of this course. Describe how your viewpoint has been ratified and/or changed during this time.

Debra Woog McGinty and Nicole C, management homework help

Debra Woog McGinty and Nicole C. Moss have compiled a short corporate culture survey aimed at identifying characteristics of workplaces. The categories of workplace description that it generates are fairly self-explanatory.

Assignment

When you have completed the assessment think about it for a minute, and how it compares to the Academy, Baseball Team, Fortress, and Club cultures described by McNamara in the Background reading. Then prepare a 2- to 3-page paper addressing:

Your scores on the McGinty/Moss assessment and whether or not they fit your general expectations bor constitute a surprise in some ways. Interpret the results of the assessment in terms of your own experience, either to confirm or to question the results. Compare your findings with the McNamara categories.

The degree to which the McGinty/Moss assessment and the McNamara information tell you similar or dissimilar things about your organization.

Do the assessment and the McNamara categories help improve your managerial understanding and/or skills? What can you infer from the assessment results about how your organization’s culture fits or doesn’t fit with you? What (if anything) can you do to make your interaction with the culture more effective?

Provide your opinion on whether or not the questions asked help you understand the organization and how you cope with it. Do they accurately assess what is needed to analyze a company’s culture?

Include the actual results to the survey in an Appendix section in your paper.

Your paper will be evaluated using the criteria as stated in the SLP rubric. The following is a review of the rubric criteria:

Assignment-Driven: Does the paper fully address all aspects of the assignment? Is the assignment addressed accurately and precisely using sound logic? Does the paper meet minimum length requirements?

Critical Thinking: Does the paper demonstrate graduate-level analysis, in which information derived from multiple sources, expert opinions, and assumptions has been critically evaluated and synthesized in the formulation of a logical set of conclusions? Does the paper address the topic with sufficient depth of discussion and analysis?

Business Writing: Is the essay logical, well organized and well written? Are the grammar, spelling, and vocabulary appropriate for graduate-level work? Are section headings included? Are paraphrasing and synthesis of concepts the primary means of responding, or is justification/support instead conveyed through excessive use of direct quotations?

Effective Use of Information: Does the submission demonstrate that the student has read, understood and can apply the background materials for the module? If required, has the student demonstrated effective research, as evidenced by student’s use of relevant and quality (library?) sources? Do additional sources used provide strong support for conclusions drawn, and do they help in shaping the overall paper?

Citing Sources: Does the student demonstrate understanding of APA Style of referencing, by inclusion of proper citations (for paraphrased text and direct quotations) as appropriate? Have all sources (e.g., references used from the Background page, the assignment readings, and outside research) been included, and are these properly cited? Have all sources cited in the paper been included on the References page?

Timeliness: Has the assignment been submitted to TLC (Trident’s learning management system) on or before the module’s due date?

Corporate culture survey

https://www.inc.com/articles/2001/08/23312.html

Compensation Practice

Compensation Practice

Due Week 4 and worth 250 points

Use the Internet or the Strayer Library to research a publicly traded company for which you would like to work.

Write a six to eight (6-8) page paper in which you:

  1. Briefly describe the company you researched, its compensation strategy, best practices they are applying, and compensation-related challenges they are facing.
  2. Analyze how your company applies compensation practice to determine the positive or negative impact to the company and its stakeholders.
  3. Examine the ways in which laws, labor unions, and market factors impact the company’s compensation practices. Provide specific examples to support your response.
  4. Evaluate the effectiveness of traditional bases for pay at the company you researched.
  5. Use at least three (3) quality references. Note: Wikipedia and other websites do not qualify as academic resources.

Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:

  • Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
  • Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.

The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:

  • Analyze how compensation practice can be applied to positively impact an organization and its stakeholders.
  • Examine the ways in which laws, labor unions, and market factors impact companies’ compensation practices.
  • Evaluate the effectiveness of traditional bases for pay (seniority and merit) against incentive-based and person-focused compensation approaches.
  • Use technology and information resources to research issues in compensation management.
  • Write clearly and concisely about compensation management using proper writing mechanics.

NOTE: Expectations & Important information for this and future assignments

The ideology behind the required assignments is to test yourself, to assess your knowledge, and to serve as a testimonial that you grasped the material. These assignments help you to grow, excel, and succeeded in the future. In order to accomplish this, here are some guidelines to follow:

  1. Read the directions/requirements
  2. Review the rubric. Have the rubric in front of you while your compost the paper.

Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic / organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric.

Points: 250

Assignment 1: Compensation Practice

Criteria

Unacceptable
Below 60% F

Meets Minimum Expectations
60-69% D

Fair
70-79% C

Proficient
80-89% B

Exemplary
90-100% A

1. Briefly describe the company you researched, its compensation strategy, best practices they are applying, and compensation-related challenges they are facing.
Weight: 10%

Did not submit or incompletely described the company you researched, its compensation strategy, best practices they are applying, and compensation-related challenges they are facing.

Insufficiently described the company you researched, its compensation strategy, best practices they are applying, and compensation-related challenges they are facing.

Partially described the company you researched, its compensation strategy, best practices they are applying, and compensation-related challenges they are facing.

Satisfactorily described the company you researched, its compensation strategy, best practices they are applying, and compensation-related challenges they are facing.

Thoroughly described the company you researched, its compensation strategy, best practices they are applying, and compensation-related challenges they are facing.

2. Analyze how your company applies compensation practice to determine the positive or negative impact to the company and its stakeholders.
Weight: 25%

Did not submit or incompletely analyzed how your company applies compensation practice to determine the positive or negative impact to the company and its stakeholders.

Insufficiently analyzed how your company applies compensation practice to determine the positive or negative impact to the company and its stakeholders.

Partially analyzed how your company applies compensation practice to determine the positive or negative impact to the company and its stakeholders.

Satisfactorily analyzed how your company applies compensation practice to determine the positive or negative impact to the company and its stakeholders.

Thoroughly analyzed how your company applies compensation practice to determine the positive or negative impact to the company and its stakeholders.

3. Examine the ways in which laws, labor unions, and market factors impact the company’s compensation practices. Provide specific examples to support your response.
Weight: 25%

Did not submit or incompletely examined the ways in which laws, labor unions, and market factors impact the company’s compensation practices. Did not submit or incompletely provided specific examples to support your response.

Insufficiently examined the ways in which laws, labor unions, and market factors impact the company’s compensation practices. Insufficiently provided specific examples to support your response.

Partially examined the ways in which laws, labor unions, and market factors impact the company’s compensation practices. Partially provided specific examples to support your response.

Satisfactorily examined the ways in which laws, labor unions, and market factors impact the company’s compensation practices. Satisfactorily provided specific examples to support your response.

Thoroughly examined the ways in which laws, labor unions, and market factors impact the company’s compensation practices. Thoroughly provided specific examples to support your response.

4. Evaluate the effectiveness of traditional bases for pay at the company you researched.
Weight: 25%

Did not submit or incompletely evaluated the effectiveness of traditional bases for pay at the company you researched.

Insufficiently evaluated the effectiveness of traditional bases for pay at the company you researched.

Partially evaluated the effectiveness of traditional bases for pay at the company you researched.

Satisfactorily evaluated the effectiveness of traditional bases for pay at the company you researched.

Thoroughly evaluated the effectiveness of traditional bases for pay at the company you researched.

5. 3 references
Weight: 5%

No references provided

Does not meet the required number of references; all references poor quality choices.

Does not meet the required number of references; some references poor quality choices.

Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices.

Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices.

6. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements
Weight: 10%

More than 8 errors present

7-8 errors present

5-6 errors present

3-4 errors present

0-2 errors present

Business Problem Solving Assignment

Using the four steps to effective problem solving (as outlined in the reading), solve the problem you are assigned below:

  • If your last name begins with A through B – As an employee at Target, I witness a friend of mine shoplifting. What should I do? Why?
  • If your last name begins with C through G – My recent paycheck was $150 more than it should have been. What should I do? Why?
  • If your last name begins with H through M – During an exam in my Introduction to Business course, the professor left the room for a few minutes. While he/she was gone, three students began comparing answers. What should I do? Why?
  • If your last name begins with N through Z – My boss always leaves one hour before I am scheduled to leave. Should I leave shortly after my boss or at my scheduled end time? Why?

Create a Word document that clearly defines the four steps used in problem solving.

Step 1: Define the problem
Step 2: Narrow the problem
Step 3: Generate solutions
Step 4: Choose the solution

Your responses should be written in complete sentences, using proper spelling, punctuation, and grammar. After reviewing your document, upload it using the link above. The assignment is worth 20 points (5 pts. for each step).

2-3 Page Essay questions (5 total) utilizing two sources I provide.

This is for a 2-3 page essay answering 5 questions in total. I have attached detailed directions for this essay along with 2 sources of reading material that is only to be used when answering these 5 questions:

1. What were Osama bin Laden’s intended strategies in response to the “Arab Spring and why did he consider it a formidable event?”

2. Explain Osama bin Laden’s relationship with regional jihadi groups at the time of his death.

3. Explain how King and Taylor describe the radicalization process for the purposes of their study, and why their study focused on the radicalization of “homegrown” jihadists.

4. Why do King and Taylor take the position that basing counter-terrorism or counter-radicalization strategies on models that have not been empirically validated can be misleading and risky? In addition, why do King and Taylor take the position that the narrative promoted by jihadists is amenable to empirical research?(NOTE: the question is not asking for a specific explanation or summary of each model).

5. What conclusions do King and Taylor reach, regarding their study of radicalization of homegrown jihadists and what recommendations do they make regarding future research?


Again, all information and material to answer these 5 questions attached here:

Instructions: Assignment Instructions 

Reading 1: Letters+From+Abottabad.pdf 

Reading 2: King & Taylor.pdf 

Thanks you!